Literature DB >> 23070345

Genomic instability at the 13q31 locus and somatic mtDNA mutation in the D-loop site correlate with tumor aggressiveness in sporadic Brazilian breast cancer cases.

Gilson Costa dos Santos1, Andréa Carla de Souza Góes, Humberto de Vitto, Carla Cristina Moreira, Elizabeth Avvad, Franklin David Rumjanek, Claudia Vitoria de Moura Gallo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Genomic instability is a hallmark of malignant tissues. In this work, we aimed to characterize nuclear and mitochondrial instabilities by determining short tandem repeats and somatic mitochondrial mutations, respectively, in a cohort of Brazilian sporadic breast cancer cases. Furthermore, we performed an association analysis of the molecular findings and the clinical pathological data.
METHODS: We analyzed 64 matched pairs of breast cancer and adjacent non-cancerous breast samples by genotyping 13 nuclear short tandem repeat loci (namely, D2S123, TPOX, D3S1358, D3S1611, FGA, D7S820, TH01, D13S317, D13S790, D16S539, D17S796, intron 12 BRCA1 and intron 1 TP53) that were amplified with the fluorescent AmpFlSTR Identifiler Genotyping system (Applied Biosystems, USA) and by silver nitrate staining following 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Somatic mtDNA mutations in the D-loop site were assessed with direct sequencing of the hypervariable HVI and HVII mitochondrial regions.
RESULTS: Half of the cancer tissues presented some nuclear instability. Interestingly, the D13S790 locus was the most frequently affected (36%), while the D2S123 locus presented no alterations. Forty-two percent of the cases showed somatic mitochondrial mutations, the majority at region 303-315 poly-C. We identified associations between Elston grade III, instabilities at 13q31 region (p = 0.0264) and mtDNA mutations (p = 0.0041). Furthermore, instabilities at 13q31 region were also associated with TP53 mutations in the invasive ductal carcinoma cases (p= 0.0207).
CONCLUSION: Instabilities at 13q31 region and the presence of somatic mtDNA mutations in a D-loop site correlated with tumor aggressiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23070345      PMCID: PMC3460021          DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2012(10)10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)        ISSN: 1807-5932            Impact factor:   2.365


INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer that affects women worldwide. One of the most striking characteristics of this disease is the heterogeneity of its genetic and pathological aspects (1). Genomic instability is one of the hallmarks of cancerous tissues, and it increases in advanced and more aggressive tumors (2,3). This instability may involve large chromosomal alterations, such as chromosomal deletions or duplications, and lead to allelic loss or amplification. In addition to the epigenetic mechanisms, the loss of heterozygosity (LOH), which results in allelic imbalance, is a common method of hampering tumor suppressor gene activities during carcinogenesis. TP53 and RB are good examples of tumor suppressor genes that are frequently altered by allelic imbalance (3). Short tandem repeats (STRs) or microsatellites are polymorphic regions that are widely used to analyze allelic imbalance in tumors. In breast cancer, LOH has been detected at several loci in both familial and sporadic breast cancers, with frequencies ranging between 20% and 79% (4,5). Recently, Tokunaga et al. (6) studied the microsatellite instability of five randomly selected loci in Japanese primary breast cancer samples. They observed that a high frequency of LOH was associated with triple-negative and high-grade HER2 breast cancers. When the same research group specifically evaluated microsatellite instability at the BRCA1 locus, they demonstrated that LOH at this region was independently associated with disease-free survival (7). In addition to nuclear genomic instabilities, researchers have also considered mitochondrial genomic alterations as indicators of cell commitment to carcinogenesis. Although their involvement is currently not well understood, somatic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations seem to participate in cancer development in different ways (8,9). Lim et al. (10) demonstrated that mtDNA mutations in colorectal cancer might be implicated in risk factors that induce poor outcomes and tumorigenesis. Tseng et al. (11) suggested that somatic mtDNA mutations may play a critical role in breast cancer progression. The aim of this study was to characterize nuclear instabilities and mitochondrial genomic mutations in a cohort of Brazilian sporadic breast cancer cases. We analyzed matched pairs of breast cancer and adjacent non-cancerous breast samples by genotyping 13 nuclear STR loci [namely, D2S123, TPOX, D3S1358, D3S1611, FGA, D7S820, TH01, D13S317, D13S790, D16S539, D17S796, intron 12 BRCA1 and intron 1 TP53] and by directly sequencing HVI and HVII mitochondrial regions. Furthermore, we performed an association analysis of the molecular findings and clinical pathological data from the cases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Tumor samples

Tissue specimens from sporadic primary breast cancer tumors and the corresponding adjacent tumor-free areas were obtained between 2005 and 2009 from the biopsies of 64 women at the Fernandes Figueira Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. After excision, the tissues were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70oC. Cancer diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology. Sixty-four percent of cases were diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma, and 36% were classified as invasive lobular carcinoma, mucinous, or micropapillary. DNA was extracted from the tissue samples using a salting-out method (12). The DNA was quantified using ethidium bromide staining in agarose gels and UV spectrophotometry at 260 nm. The P53 and estrogen/progesterone receptor levels, which were assessed by immunohistochemistry, and the clinical-pathological data were obtained from records of the department of pathology, IFF-FIOCRUZ. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee.

mtDNA sequencing

Hypervariable mitochondrial DNA regions I and II (D-loop region) were sequenced using the dideoxy chain termination method (BigDye® Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit) and analyzed in an automated ABI310 Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, USA). All of the sequences were aligned to the Revised Cambridge Reference Sequence, accession number NC_012920. The primer pairs designed for the PCR and direct sequencing of mtDNAs are provided in Supplementary Table 1. The mitochondrial somatic mutation data were assessed by comparing cancerous and adjacent non-cancerous breast samples.
Table 1

Clinical-pathological aspects of the cases and an association analysis of STR instabilities and mtDNA mutations (n = 64).

Clinical-pathologicalAll STR instabilitiesInstability at 13q31 ¤¤Somatic mtDNA mutations §)
aspectsnS (n = 31)U (n = 33)p-valueS (n = 37)U (n = 27)p-valueWT (n = 37)M (n = 27)p-value
Age (years)
<5537191821162215
≥552712150.621016111.000015120.8017
Ethnic group
African2712151611189
Non-African3719180.621021161.000019180.3063
European26121413131511
Non-European3819190.803524140.316122161.0000
AA11748347
Non-AA5324290.331229240.331133200.1792
Tumor size
≤2 cm (T1)31171419121813
>2 cm (T2+T3)2811170.299416120.795210180.1188
Lymph node¤
Negative33151818151716
Positive2613130.790016100.790011150.6013
Histological subtype
IDC44212326182618
Others2010101.00001190.79041190.7904
Elston grade (n = 53)
I+II40221827132515
III13490.2021490.0264*)2110.0041**)
Progesterone receptor
Positive32122018141913
Negative3119120.079319120.799411200.0787
Estrogen receptor
Positive47242330172918
Negative16790.7735790.23971150.0001**)
p53
Positive19712910712
Negative4424200.273728160.272123210.2866
TP53 mutation
WT50272332183317
Mutant144100.1322590.07244100.0162*)

¤¤ 13q31 region: D13S317 and D13S790 STR loci.

n - Total number of samples; S - Number of stable samples; U - Number of unstable samples; AA - Asian-Amerindian; mtDNA – Mitochondrial DNA.

WT - Wild type; M – Mutation; IDC - Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.

Mitochondrial alteration within the D-loop region.

¤ Lymph node metastasis: Negative (N0); Positive (N1+N2+N3).

Fisher's exact test (p≤0.05 statistically significant).

Fisher's exact test (p≤0.05 highly statistically significant).

STR typing of nuclear DNA and TP53 mutation detection

Nuclear genomic instability was assessed by PCR analysis of 13 STR markers. The TPOX, D3S1358, FGA, D7S820, TH01, D13S317 and D16S539 loci were amplified with the fluorescent AmpFlSTR Identifiler Genotyping system according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Applied Biosystems, USA) and then analyzed using the automated ABI3100 Genetic Analyzer platform and GeneMapper Software (Applied Biosystem, USA). The D13S790 locus was amplified with an independent FAM-fluorescent system and analyzed using the ABI3100 Genetic Analyzer platform (Applied Biosystems, USA). The D2S123, D3S1611, D17S796, intron 12 BRCA1 and intron 1 TP53 loci were analyzed using silver nitrate staining following a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Nuclear genome instability was assessed by observing the allelic imbalances, which are usually identified as LOH. Supplementary Table 1 shows the STR loci localizations and the primer sequences. When the allelic patterns differed between the matched normal and tumor DNAs, the PCRs and electrophoresis were performed twice. Eventually, the lymphocyte DNAs of patients were also genotyped and compared to normal and tumor DNAs to confirm results. In a previous study, TP53 mutation detection was performed for exons 4-9 (13). The association analyses were performed with Fisher's exact test with a significance level of 95% using GraphPad® software.

RESULTS

Clinical-pathological aspects of cases

To obtain all the possible noteworthy clinical-pathological data from the studied cases, the 64 patients were evaluated for age, ethnicity, histological classification, TNM, Elston grade, p53 and estrogen and progesterone receptor expression levels (Table 1) and Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). The average age of the studied patients was 53, and the ages ranged from 27 to 76 years. The ethnic classification was based on mitochondrial haplogroups. The patients were classified into three ethnic groups: African (42%), European (40%) and Asian-Amerindians (18%). Most of the cases (69%) were diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs). The other histological subtypes, which represented a total of 18 cases (31%), included the following subtypes: invasive papillary carcinoma, comedocarcinoma, mucinous and medullar intraductal carcinoma. Most of the cases (75%) were classified at low or intermediate grades, although 25% were Elston grade III (high aggressiveness). Fifty percent of the cases were progesterone-positive, and 74% were estrogen-positive. In relation to the p53 tumor suppressor protein, 70% of the cases were protein-negative, and 22% were mutant (13).
Table 2

Association analysis of TP53 and mtDNA mutations with STR instabilities in invasive ductal carcinoma cases (n = 44).

Clinical-pathologicalAll STR instabilitiesInstability at 13q31¤
aspectsnS (n = 23)U (n = 21)p-valueS (n = 26)U (n = 18)p-value
TP53 mutation14
WT35212411
Mutant9270.0642270.0207*)
mtDNA mutations §)
WT261511179
Mutant188100.5406990.3613

¤13q31region: D13S317 and D13S790 STR loci.

n – Total number of samples; S - Number of stable samples; U - Number of unstable samples; WT - Wild Type.

Somatic mtDNA mutations within the D-loop region.

Fisher's exact test (P≤0.05 statistically significant).

Supplementary Table 1

Nuclear STR and mtDNA primer sequences.

LocusChromosomelocalizationMotifPrimer sequencesAmplicon(bp)
TPOX2p23AATGACTGGCACAGAACAGGCACTTAGGGGAGGAACTGGGAACCACAGAGGTTAFR224-252
D2S1232p16(hMSH2)CAAAACAGGATGCCTGCCTTTAGGACTTTCCACCTATGGGACFR197-227
D3S16113p21(hMLH1)CACCCCAAGGCTGCACTTAGCTGAGACTACAGGCATTTGFR260-268
D3S13583p21TCTAACTCGAGTCCAATCTGGTTATGAAATCAACAGAGGCTTGFR97-147
FGA4p28TTTCGCCCCATAGGTTTTGAACTCATGATTTGTCTGTAATTGCCAGCFR206-332
D7S8207q11GATAGATTCCACATTTATCCTCATTGACATGTTGGTCAGGCTGACTATGFR215-247
TH0111p15AATGATTCAAAGGGTATCTGGGCTCTGGGTGGGCTGAAAAGCTCCCGATTATFR179-203
D13S79013q31GATATTGAGCCAGGATGATGTGCCTTTGGGTTGTAAACGTFR422-454
D13S31713q31TATCACAGAAGTCTGGGATGTGGAGCCCAAAAAGACAGACAGAAFR165-197
D16S53916q24GATAGGGGGTCTAAGAGCTTGTAAAAAGGTTTGTGTGTGCATCTGTAAGCATFR264-288
BRCA117q(intron 12 BRCA)TGGGTCATGTGTTCCATTTGGGTTGAAGCAACTTTGCAATGAGFR190-270
D17S79617pCACAATGGAACCAAATGTGGTCAGTCCGATAATGCCAGGATGFR144-174
TP5317p(intron 1 TP53)AAAATGCACTGACAAAACATCCCCTAGTAAGCGGAGATAGTGCCACTGTFR150-180
HVImtDNA-CGCACCTACGTTCAATATTACAGGGGTGTGTGTGTGCTGGGTAGGFR364
HVIImtDNA-ATTACTGCCAGCCACCATGAAACGTGTGGGCTATTTAGGCTTTAFR445

F-Forward; R-Reverse.

Nuclear and mitochondrial genome instability

To investigate the genomic instability of our breast cancer cases, both the nuclear and mitochondrial DNAs were analyzed. Nuclear genome instabilities were detected by analyzing the forensic CODIS-recommended STR loci (i.e., D2S123, TPOX, D3S1358, FGA, D7S820, TH01, D13S317, D16S539) and the STRs that were designed for this study (i.e., D3S1611, D13S790, D17S796, intron 12 BRCA1 and intron 1 TP53). Figure 1 shows an example of LOH detection at the D13S317 locus using the fluorescent Identifiler system and a silver-stained polyacrylamide gel. Approximately half of the cases displayed microsatellite instability to some extent; this instability was characterized by allelic imbalances and 41% of cases exhibited alterations in three or more loci. Among the 13 analyzed STR loci, only the D2S123 locus was stable and the D7S820 locus had the lowest frequency of instability (1%). The intron 1 TP53 and D13S317 loci were each unstable in 16% of cases. Interestingly, the D13S790 locus had the highest frequency of instability among the STR loci (36%). Figure 2 displays the distribution of the number of instabilities in the STR loci. Supplementary Table 4 summarizes the data that was obtained from each of the 64 cases. Regarding the mitochondrial genome analysis, 42.18% of cases had somatic mutations, most of which were at the 303-315 poly-C region (Supplementary Table 4). Figure 3 illustrates an example of mtDNA mutation assessed by direct sequencing.
Figure 1

Detection of LOH at the D13S317 locus. The same matched pair of samples was analyzed twice in both systems (A: Identifiler fluorescent system; and B: silver-stained polyacrylamide gel) to confirm the instability. N: normal tissue; T: tumor tissue.

Figure 2

Distribution of STR instabilities among the loci. The D2S123 locus presented no alterations. N: number of genetic instabilities at each STR locus.

Figure 3

Detection of the mtDNA somatic mutation (16192 CC/T) in a case of breast cancer. The arrow indicates the mutation. N: normal tissue; T: tumor tissue.

Association with clinical-pathological aspects

Following the determination of nuclear instabilities and mitochondrial genomic alterations, an association study with clinical-pathological aspects was performed. Interestingly, when the most frequent unstable genome region (13q31, assessed here through the microsatellite markers D13S317 and D13S790) was analyzed separately, it was statistically associated with Elston grade III (p = 0.0264) (Table 1). Furthermore, a positive association was also observed with the presence of TP53 mutations in IDCs (p = 0.0207) (Table 2). A highly positive association with Elston grade III was also observed with the presence of somatic mtDNA mutations (p = 0.0041). Moreover, reinforcing their correlation with parameters of tumor aggressiveness, the mtDNA mutations were statistically associated with negative estrogen receptor expression (p = 0.0001) and TP53 mutations (p = 0.0162). There was no correlation between the STR instabilities and the somatic mtDNA mutations.

DISCUSSION

Several molecular mechanisms are involved in the formation and progression of breast carcinomas, particularly sporadic breast cancers. An important feature of breast tumor development is the characteristic but highly heterogeneous genomic instability (14). Recently, the advantageous utilization of genome-scale analysis and microarray-based gene expression profiling has stressed the complexity of breast cancer progression (15,16). This study was designed and executed to provide further understanding of genomic instability in Brazilian breast cancer cases. We performed nuclear STR loci genotyping and direct sequencing of HVI and HVII mitochondrial regions of 64 matched pairs of cancerous and adjacent non-cancerous breast samples. Our main aims were to detect genomic instabilities in well-known DNA regions using selected STR loci and the mitochondrial D-loop region and to analyze their association with clinical aspects. With the results, we could expect to have a clearer understanding of local and defined genomic changes, both nuclear and mitochondrial, and their clinical consequences. Surprisingly, through the microsatellite markers D13S317 and D13S790, we found that 13q31 was the most frequent unstable genomic region. It was most apparent at the D13S790 locus, with more than 20 cases presenting LOH. When analyzed separately from the other chromosomal loci, 13q31 was shown to be statistically associated with Elston grade III in all breast tumors and with TP53 mutations in invasive ductal carcinomas, both of which are clinical parameters of tumor aggressiveness (17,18). The 13q31 locus has been described as a chromosome region that shows different genetic alterations depending on the cancer type. Genetic gains have been observed in sarcoma (19) and colorectal cancer (20). Genetic losses have also been verified in breast cancer (21,22). Eiriksdottir et al. (23) analyzed chromosome 13q in detail in 139 sporadic breast tumors with 18 polymorphic microsatellite markers and identified 3 LOH target regions: 13q12-q13, 13q14 and 13q31-q34. In another study, correlations were detected between the allelic loss of the D13S1694 marker (telomeric to BRCA2) and both larger tumor sizes and negative estrogen receptors (24). More recently, Schwarzenbach et al. (25), studying cell-free DNA in benign and malignant breast tumor cases, noted that LOH at D13S280 and D13S159, both markers located at 13q31-33, are associated with overall and disease-free survival. In this same study, all of the analyzed markers significantly correlated with lymph node status (25). Together, these results and our results suggest the existence of a putative suppressor gene or an important regulator sequence in this region. The miR17-92 cluster (13q31.3 region) is located near the 13q31 region; the cluster consists of seven microRNAs tightly grouped within an 800 bp genomic region in the third intron of the primary transcript C13orf25. This cluster is also known as oncomir-1 because its superexpression has been demonstrated in pulmonary cancer and lymphomas (26,27). However, there is some evidence of LOH in this genomic region, mainly in breast cancer, indicating that this cluster can also play a role as a tumor suppressor gene (28,29). Our results reinforce the hypothesis that instability in the 13q31 region may relate to a loss of function of microRNAs in this cluster. Because most of the allelic imbalances were associated with Elston grade III, and (more importantly) 13q31 LOH was associated with TP53 mutations in the IDC samples, we can infer that this alteration is a delayed event in breast tumor progression. We also investigated somatic mutations in the D-loop region of the mtDNA and found that 42.18% of cases were mutated, the majority at the 303-315 poly-C region. As has been described by others (30,31), we could demonstrate an association between the presence of mtDNA mutations and breast tumor aggressiveness. Parameters such as high histological grade (Elston grade III), estrogen receptor-negative and TP53 mutations were statistically associated. Kuo et al. (32) recently reported that the presence of somatic mutations in the D-loop indicates poor prognosis; however, they did not identify a correlation with the presence of TP53 mutations in 30 pairs of tumor and non-tumor samples. The low number of samples and/or the different types of breast cancer cases could explain the difference. TP53 and somatic mtDNA mutations have been considered to be good biomarkers of nuclear DNA damage (18,32); therefore, a correlation between both genetic alterations would be expected. However, we did not identify any association between nuclear instabilities and mtDNA alterations. Alazzouzi et al. (33) also observed that mitochondrial alterations were not associated with nuclear instability in breast tumors. In a study of colorectal carcinomas, instability in the 303 poly-C region of mtDNA was not associated with nuclear microsatellite instability (34). These observations suggest an independent occurrence of both phenomena. In conclusion, although the number of the Brazilian cases evaluated in this study was not high, we could highlight an important role for instabilities at the nuclear 13q31 locus and in mtDNA in breast cancer development and prognosis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the patients for their collaborative participation in this study. Gilson Costa dos Santos Junior and Humberto de Vitto were recipients of fellowships from CNPq/Brazil, and Carla Cristina Moreira was a recipient of a fellowship from PIBIC/CNPq/Brazil. We also thank Angela Duarte, Genomic Platform, UERJ, for her technical assistance. This work was supported by grants from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ).
Supplementary Table 2

Clinical-pathological patient data.

CaseAge(Years)Ethnicity§)HistologicalclassificationTNMEGImmunohistochemistryPR ER P53
T252AfricanIDCpT1c pN0 (sn) pMxI++++++-
T448AfricanIDCpT1c pN0 (sn) pMxII++-
T553AfricanIDCpTis pN0 (sn) pMx*)NDNDND
T656EuropeanIDCpT2c pN2a pMxIII--+
T849AfricanIDCpT1c pN0 (sn) pMxI++++++-
T960AfricanInvasive lobularpT2c pN0 (sn) pMx*)-+++-
T1044AAIDCpT2 pN0 pMxIII--+
T1127AfricanIntracystic papillarypTis pN0 pMx*)++++-
T1454AfricanIDCpT2 pN2a pMXII++++-
T1541AfricanIDCpT1c pN0 (sn) pMxI-++++
T1648AAIDCpT1c pN0 (sn) pMXI-+++-
T1746EuropeanIDCpT2 pN1a pMxII---
T1854EuropeanIDCpT1c pN2a pMX*)++++++-
T1950AfricanMucinouspT1c pN0 (sn) pMXI-+++-
T2139AAIDCpT1b pN0 pMXIII--+
T2355AfricanIDCpT2 pN1a pMxI++++++-
T2546EuropeanIDCpT1c pN0 pMXII-+++-
T2660AfricanIDCpT3 pN0 pMxIII---
T2772AfricanInvasive papillarypT1c pNx pMxII-+-
T2846EuropeanIDCpT1c pN0 (sn) pMxIII-+++-
T2970AfricanInvasive papillarypT2 pN0 (sn) pMXI+++++-
T3136AfricanInvasive micropapillarypT2 pN1a pMxIII---
T3250AAIDCpT1c pN0 pMxI-++-
T3356EuropeanIDCpT1c pN2a pMxIII-+++-
T3446EuropeanIDCpT2 pN1a pMxIII--+
T3549EuropeanIDCpT1c pN0 (sn) pMxII+++--
T3653EuropeanIDCpT2 pN0 (sn) pMxII--+
T3747EuropeanMucinouspT1c pN0 (sn) pMxI-+-
T3861AfricanIDCpT1b pN0 (sn) pMxI++++++-
T4066AfricanIDCpT1c pN2 pMxIII-++++
T4240AfricanIDCpT2 pN0 (sn) pMxI++++++-
T4352AAIDCpTis pN0 (sn) pMx*)---
T4458AfricanIDCpT2 pN1a pMxII++++++-
T4644EuropeanIDCpT2 pN3a pMxII-+++-
T4771EuropeanIDCpT2 pN0 pMxII+++++++
T4840EuropeanIDCpT1c pN0 pMxII--+
T5042AfricanInvasive lobularpT1a pN1a pMx*)++++++
T5240EuropeanIDCpT2 pN1a pMxII+++++-
T5360EuropeanIDCpT1c pN1a pMxI-+++-
T5540EuropeanInvasive apocrinepT1a pN1a pMx*)+++
T5674AAIDCpT2 pN1a pMxII-+++-
T5870AAInvasive lobularpT2 pN1a pMx*)++++++-
T5946AfricanInvasive apocrinepT2 pN1a pMxII--+
T6058EuropeanIDCpT2 pN1a pMxI+++++-
T6144AAIDCpT2 pN1b1 pMxII+++
T6276EuropeanIDCpT1 pN0 pMxII++-
T6371AfricanIDCpT1 pN1 pMxI++-
T6553AfricanInvasive papillaryNDII-+-
T6859AfricanInvasive micropapillarypT2 pN3 pMxIII--+
T6972EuropeanInvasive lobularpT1 pN0 pMx*)+++
T7050EuropeanIDCpT2 pN0 pMxII++-
T7163EuropeanInvasive lobularpT1 pN1 pMx*)+++
T7268EuropeanIDCpT2 pN0 pMxIII--+
T7363AfricanInvasive papillarypT1 pN2 pMxIII---
T7475EuropeanIDCpT1 pN0 pMxIII--+
T7541EuropeanIDCpT2 pN1 pMxII++-
T7660AAInvasive micropapillarypT2 pN2 pMxII++-
T7746AfricanIDCpT1 pN0 pMxI++-
T7866EuropeanIDCpT1 pNx pMxII++-
T8028AAIDCpTis pN0 pMx*)-++
T8147AfricanIDCpT2 pN0 pMxII++-
T8269EuropeanInvasive micropapillarypT1 pNx pMxII++-
T8349AfricanInvasive mixed typepT2 pNx pMxII++-
T8561AAInvasive apocrinepT1 pN0 pMxII++-

IDC – Invasive ductal carcinoma; TNM – Tumor-lymph node metastasis; EG – Elston grade; PR – Progesterone receptor; ER – Estrogen receptor; Protein expression: (-) negative, (+) positive - 25-50%, (++) positive - 50-75%; (+++) positive - more than 75%; ND - no data; AA - Asian-Amerindian.

Without Elston grade classification.

Ethnicity determined by mitochondrial haplogroup.

Supplementary Table 3

Classification of cases according to the clinical-pathological aspects (total  =  64).

VariablesNumber of samplesn (%)
Age (years)
<4545-5555-6565-75>7514 (22)24 (37)13 (20)12 (19)1 (2)
Tumor size
T1 (≤2 cm)T2 (> 2 cm)T3 (> 5 cm)Tis (Carcinoma in situ)ND31 (48)27 (42)1 (2)4 (6)1 (2)
Lymph node metastasis
N0N1N2N3NxND33 (52)17 (26)7 (11)2 (3)4 (6)1 (2)
Histological subtype
IDCInvasive LobularOthers §44 (69)5 (8)15 (23)
Elston grade*
IIIIII15 (28)25 (47)13 (25)
Progesterone receptor
PR +PR ++PR +++PR –ND18 (28)4 (6)10 (16)31 (48)1 (2)
Estrogen receptor
ER +ER ++ER +++ER –ND20 (31)1 (2)26 (40)16 (25)1 (2)
P53
p53+p53-ND19 (30)44 (68)1 (2)

IDC - Invasive ductal carcinoma; § Other histological subtypes - Invasive papillary, comedocarcinoma, mucinous, medullar intraductal; PR - Progesterone receptor; ER - Estrogen receptor; High levels of protein expression - +: 25-50%, ++: 50-75%, +++:>75%; -: Normal levels or low levels of protein expression; * Elston grade was applied only for the IDC subtype and other types of IDC; ND – Not detected.

Supplementary Table 4

Unstable STR loci, mtDNA mutations and TP53 mutation status (exons 4-9).

CaseUnstable STR lociMitochondrial somatic mutationsTP53 mutation
T2D17S796,D13S790-G245S
T4D13S790--
T5D13S790--
T6-303-315C (8-9) TC (6)-
T8-16192 CC/T-
T9D13S79016309 AA/G-
T10D3S1358, D13S317, D17S796, D3S1611, BRCA1303-315 C (7-8) TC (6)R248Q
T11D13S790--
T14TH01, TP53, D3S1611, D3S1358, D17S796303-315 C (7-8) TC (6)-
T15---
T16-303-315 C (7-8) TC (6)16391 GG/A-
T17-303-315 C (7-8) T C (6)16261 CC/T-
T18--R175H
T19-303-315 C (7-8) TC (6)H168P
T21FGA, D3S1358, D3S1611, D13S790303-315 C (8-9) TC (6)R273H
T23---
T25-16192CC/T-
T26TP53,FGA, D16S539, D13S317--
T27---
T28---
T29D16S539, D17S796146 TT/C-
T31FGA, D13S317, TH01, BRCA1, D13S790-16888delC
T32---
T33D13S790-16897-16911del
T34D13S790303-315 C (8-9) TC (6)66 GG/TY234C
T35D13S790, D17S796, TP53--
T36---
T37D13S317--
T38TP53-
T40D13S317, FGA, TH01, D17S796, D3S1611, TP53, BRCA1, D3S1358, TPOX,D13S790294 TT/CI195L
T42-16261CC/T-
T43-303-315 C (7-8) TC (6)-
T44---
T46---
T47D16S539, TP53, TPOX--
T48---
T50TP53--
T52TP53,D13S317, D16S539,D13S790--
T53---
T55-294 TT/CW146stop
T56---
T58---
T59TP53,TH01, BRCA1, D3S1358, D16S539, D13S317, D13S790303-315 C (7-8) TC (6)338 CC/TP278A
T60TH01,D16S539, D13S317--
T61TP53,D13S317,D13S790215 AA/G-
T62-303-315 C (8-9) TC (6)-
T63---
T65---
T68---
T69D13S790303-315 C (7-8) TC (6)338 CC/T-
T70D13S790--
T71D13S790215AA/C-
T72D7S820,TH01, D16S539, D17S796,D13S790303-315 C (7-8) TC (6)R175H
T73---
T74D13S790303-315 C (7-8) TC (6)16291 CC/T-
T75---
T76D3S1611303-315 C (7-8) TCD259V
T77---
T78D13S790303-315 C (7-8) TC (6)16291CC/T-
T80---
T81D13S790,D13S317303-315 C (7-8) TC (6)-
T82D13S790,D16S539--
T83D13S790--
T85---
  34 in total

1.  A novel and consistent amplicon at 13q31 associated with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  A T Gordon; C Brinkschmidt; J Anderson; N Coleman; B Dockhorn-Dworniczak; K Pritchard-Jones; J Shipley
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 2.  Histological types of breast cancer: how special are they?

Authors:  Britta Weigelt; Felipe C Geyer; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  Molecular profiling: moving away from tumor philately.

Authors:  Jorge S Reis-Filho; Britta Weigelt; Debora Fumagalli; Christos Sotiriou
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells.

Authors:  S A Miller; D D Dykes; H F Polesky
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Mitochondrial mutations in cancer.

Authors:  M Brandon; P Baldi; D C Wallace
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 6.  Genomic instability in breast cancer: pathogenesis and clinical implications.

Authors:  Kevin A Kwei; Yvonne Kung; Keyan Salari; Ilona N Holcomb; Jonathan R Pollack
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 6.603

7.  Number of somatic mutations in the mitochondrial D-loop region indicates poor prognosis in breast cancer, independent of TP53 mutation.

Authors:  Shou-Jen Kuo; Ming Chen; Gwo-Chin Ma; Shou-Tung Chen; Shun-Ping Chang; Wen-Yin Lin; Yen-Chieh Chen; Tsung-Hsien Lee; Ta-Tsung Lin; Chin-San Liu
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2010-09

Review 8.  TP53 mutations in human cancers: origins, consequences, and clinical use.

Authors:  Magali Olivier; Monica Hollstein; Pierre Hainaut
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 10.005

9.  Loss of heterozygosity of BRCA1, BRCA2 and ATM genes in sporadic invasive ductal breast carcinoma.

Authors:  P G Rio; D Pernin; J O Bay; E Albuisson; F Kwiatkowski; M De Latour; D J Bernard-Gallon; Y J Bignon
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.650

10.  High incidence and frequency of LOH are associated with aggressive features of high-grade HER2 and triple-negative breast cancers.

Authors:  Eriko Tokunaga; Satoko Okada; Nami Yamashita; Sayuri Akiyoshi; Hiroyuki Kitao; Masaru Morita; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 4.239

View more
  2 in total

1.  Mitochondria and familial predisposition to breast cancer.

Authors:  Stefania Weigl; Angelo Paradiso; Stefania Tommasi
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.236

Review 2.  Research highlights on contributions of mitochondrial DNA microsatellite instability in solid cancers - an overview.

Authors:  Abdul Aziz Mohamed Yusoff; Siti Muslihah Abd Radzak; Siti Zulaikha Nashwa Mohd Khair
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2022-03-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.