Literature DB >> 23069952

Validation of dermoscopy as a real-time noninvasive diagnostic imaging technique for actinic keratosis.

María Huerta-Brogeras1, Olga Olmos, Jesús Borbujo, Almudena Hernández-Núñez, Esther Castaño, Alberto Romero-Maté, Diego Martínez-Sánchez, Cristina Martínez-Morán.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To validate dermoscopy as a real-time noninvasive diagnostic imaging technique for actinic keratosis (AK).
DESIGN: Prospective study to validate a diagnostic test.
SETTING: Dermatology department of a tertiary university hospital in Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain. PATIENTS: A total of 178 patients with a clinical diagnosis of AK participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An independent blinded comparison was performed between dermoscopy results and histopathological findings, the gold standard for the diagnosis of AK. All the patients underwent both diagnostic tests.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy-eight lesions were evaluated. The concordance between dermoscopy results and histopathological findings was 0.917. The sensitivity of dermoscopy for the diagnosis of AK was 98.7%, with a specificity of 95.0%, a positive likelihood ratio of 19.74, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.01. A diagnostic algorithm that combined follicular openings and erythematous pseudonetwork demonstrated a sensitivity of 95.6% and a specificity of 95.0% for the diagnosis of AK.
CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and specificity of dermoscopy for the diagnosis of AK were high, as was the concordance between dermoscopy results and histopathological findings. As a real-time noninvasive diagnostic imaging technique for AK, dermoscopy may be incorporated in the management of patients with these lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23069952     DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2012.1060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  5 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopy of Actinic Keratosis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Karla L Valdés-Morales; María Luisa Peralta-Pedrero; Fermín Jurado-Santa Cruz; Martha Alejandra Morales-Sánchez
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2020-10-26

Review 2.  Enhancing Skin Cancer Diagnosis with Dermoscopy.

Authors:  Zachary J Wolner; Oriol Yélamos; Konstantinos Liopyris; Tova Rogers; Michael A Marchetti; Ashfaq A Marghoob
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.478

3.  Metaphoric and descriptive terminology in dermoscopy: Lessons from the cognitive sciences.

Authors:  Jason Giacomel; Iris Zalaudek; Ashfaq A Marghoob
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2015-04-30

Review 4.  Noninvasive Imaging Tools in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Skin Cancers.

Authors:  Renato Marchiori Bakos; Tatiana Pinto Blumetti; Rodrigo Roldán-Marín; Gabriel Salerni
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.403

5.  Efficacy of Ingenol Mebutate in the Treatment of Actinic Keratoses: A Pre- and Posttreatment Dermoscopic Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Mattia Carbotti; Rosa Coppola; Salvatore Zanframundo; Valeria Devirgiliis; Vincenzo Panasiti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.