Literature DB >> 23069384

Centralization of radical prostatectomy in the United States.

Christopher B Anderson1, David F Penson, Shenghua Ni, Danil V Makarov, Daniel A Barocas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Radical prostatectomy is a common treatment for organ confined prostate cancer and its use is increasing. We examined how the increased volume is being distributed and what hospital characteristics are associated with increasing volume.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all men age 40 to less than 80 years who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer from 2000 to 2008 in the NIS (Nationwide Inpatient Sample) (586,429). Ownership of a surgical robot was determined using the 2007 AHA (American Hospital Association) Annual Survey. The association between hospital radical prostatectomy volume and hospital characteristics, including ownership of a robot, was explored using multivariate linear regression.
RESULTS: From 2000 to 2008 there was a 74% increase in the number of radical prostatectomies performed (p = 0.05) along with a 19% decrease in the number of hospitals performing radical prostatectomy (p <0.001), resulting in an increase in annual hospital radical prostatectomy volume (p = 0.009). Several hospital variables were associated with greater radical prostatectomy volume including teaching status, urban location, large bed size and ownership of a robot in 2007. On multivariate analysis the year, teaching status, large bed size, urban location and presence of a robot were associated with higher hospital radical prostatectomy volume.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of radical prostatectomy increased significantly between 2000 and 2008, most notably after 2005. The increase in radical prostatectomy resulted in centralization to select hospitals, particularly those in the top radical prostatectomy volume quartile and those investing in robotic technology. Our findings support the hypothesis that hospitals with the greatest volume increases are specialty centers already performing a high volume of radical prostatectomy procedures.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23069384     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  11 in total

1.  Modern utilization of penile prosthesis surgery: a national claim registry analysis.

Authors:  R L Segal; S B Camper; A L Burnett
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  Variation in prostate cancer treatment associated with population density of the county of residence.

Authors:  C Cary; A Y Odisho; M R Cooperberg
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  Prospective Multicenter Comparison of Open and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: The PROST-QA/RP2 Consortium.

Authors:  Peter Chang; Andrew A Wagner; Meredith M Regan; Joseph A Smith; Christopher S Saigal; Mark S Litwin; Jim C Hu; Matthew R Cooperberg; Peter R Carroll; Eric A Klein; Adam S Kibel; Gerald L Andriole; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; David P Wood; Catrina M Crociani; Thomas K Greenfield; Dattatraya Patil; Larry A Hembroff; Kyle Davis; Linda Stork; Daniel E Spratt; John T Wei; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy versus open simple prostatectomy: a New York statewide analysis of early adoption and outcomes between 2009 and 2017.

Authors:  Krishna T Ravivarapu; Olamide Omidele; John Pfail; Nir Tomer; Alexander C Small; Michael A Palese
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-10-03

5.  The Comparative Harms of Open and Robotic Prostatectomy in Population Based Samples.

Authors:  Brock O'Neil; Tatsuki Koyama; JoAnn Alvarez; Ralph M Conwill; Peter C Albertsen; Matthew R Cooperberg; Michael Goodman; Sheldon Greenfield; Ann S Hamilton; Karen E Hoffman; Richard M Hoffman; Sherrie H Kaplan; Janet L Stanford; Antoinette M Stroup; Lisa E Paddock; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Robert A Stephenson; Matthew J Resnick; Daniel A Barocas; David F Penson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Robotic prostatectomy is associated with increased patient travel and treatment delay.

Authors:  Matthew J Maurice; Hui Zhu; Simon P Kim; Robert Abouassaly
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Disparities in the receipt of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: between-hospital and within-hospital analysis using 2009-2011 California inpatient data.

Authors:  Jungyoon Kim; Wael ElRayes; Fernando Wilson; Dejun Su; Dmitry Oleynikov; Marsha Morien; Li-Wu Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Population-based study of long-term functional outcomes after prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Sigrid Carlsson; Linda Drevin; Stacy Loeb; Anders Widmark; Ingela Franck Lissbrant; David Robinson; Eva Johansson; Pär Stattin; Per Fransson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  American trends in expectant management utilization for prostate cancer from 2000 to 2009.

Authors:  Matthew J Maurice; Robert Abouassaly; Hui Zhu
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Current Trend of Robotic Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeries in Korea: Analysis of Seven-Year National Data.

Authors:  Chang Hyun Kang; Jin San Bok; Na Rae Lee; Young Tae Kim; Seon Heui Lee; Cheong Lim
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-10-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.