Literature DB >> 2306754

Mouse tumors are heterogeneous in their susceptibility to syngeneic lymphokine-activated killer cells and delineate functional subsets in such effectors.

M Sensi1, L Grazioli, M Rodolfo, G Parmiani.   

Abstract

We have analyzed whether lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells, generated from C57BL/6J (B6) spleen cells at different times after recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) culture, could be heterogeneous in their ability to lyse a variety of tumor targets. When tested 3 days after exposure to 250 U/ml rIL-2 (day-3 LAK cells) a significant lysis was detected with the natural-killer(NK)-sensitive YAC lymphoma, the NK-resistant P815 mastocytoma, three different syngeneic melanomas and a syngeneic fibrosarcoma (group 1 targets), whereas no lysis was observed with a reticulum cell sarcoma, two different lymphomas or concanavalin A blasts, all of B6 origin (group 2 targets). LAK cells cultured for 5 days, however, lysed group 2 targets and showed a parallel increase of cytotoxic activity against group 1 targets. At day 7, LAK activity declined on all targets examined. In cold-target inhibition studies, the lysis of group 1 tumor targets by day-3 or day-5 LAK cells could be inhibited only by group 1 and not by group 2 unlabelled tumor cells. All group 1 tumors could effectively compete each other. Conversely, the lysis of group 2 tumor targets by day-5 LAK cells was inhibited by both group 1 and group 2 targets. These data indicate the presence of separate LAK effectors that appear to arise with different time kinetics and have different recognition structures. In vitro antibody depletion at the effector level showed that day-3 LAK cells with cytotoxic activity against group 1 tumors were ASGM1+. Day-5 LAK cells included both ASGM1+ and Lyt2+ effectors and both populations, although to a different extent, contributed to the lysis of all targets. Our results indicate that LAK cells are functionally heterogeneous. This heterogeneity is defined by their susceptible target cells and cannot be ascribed to different (Lyt2+ versus ASGM1+) lineages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2306754     DOI: 10.1007/bf01742493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother        ISSN: 0340-7004            Impact factor:   6.968


  32 in total

1.  Laminin receptor expression on murine tumor cells: correlation with sensitivity to natural cell-mediated cytotoxicity.

Authors:  K A Laybourn; J C Hiserodt; J Varani
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1989-04-15       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Surface markers of human lymphokine-activated killer cells and their precursors. Analysis at the population and clonal level.

Authors:  S Ferrini; L Moretta; G Pantaleo; A Moretta
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1987-01-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Lymphokine-activated killer cells: a new approach to immunotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  S Rosenberg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Lymphokine-activated killer cells: lysis of fresh syngeneic natural killer-resistant murine tumor cells by lymphocytes cultured in interleukin 2.

Authors:  M Rosenstein; I Yron; Y Kaufmann; S A Rosenberg
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Analysis of the murine lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cell phenomenon: dissection of effectors and progenitors into NK- and T-like cells.

Authors:  T Kalland; H Belfrage; P Bhiladvala; G Hedlund
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1987-06-01       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Lymphokine-activated killer cells in rats: analysis of progenitor and effector cell phenotype and relationship to natural killer cells.

Authors:  N L Vujanovic; R B Herberman; M W Olszowy; D V Cramer; R R Salup; C W Reynolds; J C Hiserodt
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Studies of lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells. I. Evidence using novel monoclonal antibodies that most human LAK precursor cells share a common surface marker.

Authors:  D G Morris; H F Pross
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1989-03-01       Impact factor: 14.307

8.  Lymphokine-activated killer cells. Analysis of progenitors and effectors.

Authors:  J R Ortaldo; A Mason; R Overton
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1986-10-01       Impact factor: 14.307

9.  Resistance of cytotoxic T lymphocytes to the lytic effects of their toxic granules.

Authors:  C R Verret; A A Firmenich; D M Kranz; H N Eisen
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1987-11-01       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Lymphokine-activated killer cell phenomenon. II. Precursor phenotype is serologically distinct from peripheral T lymphocytes, memory cytotoxic thymus-derived lymphocytes, and natural killer cells.

Authors:  E A Grimm; K M Ramsey; A Mazumder; D J Wilson; J Y Djeu; S A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1983-03-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effect of culture media on lymphokine-activated killer effector phenotype and lytic capacity.

Authors:  D M Finkelstein; R G Miller
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.968

2.  Postsurgical adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with recombinant interleukin-2 and 1,3-bis-(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea on spontaneous metastases of a non-immunogenic murine tumour.

Authors:  G Acerbis; L Cleris; M Rodolfo; G Parmiani; F Formelli
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 6.968

3.  Combined activation of murine lymphocytes with staphylococcal enterotoxin and interleukin-2 results in additive cytotoxic activity.

Authors:  H Belfrage; P Bhiladvala; G Hedlund; M Dohlsten; T Kalland
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 6.968

4.  Effect of interferon gamma on the sensitivity of bovine-papilloma-virus(BPV1)-transformed cell lines to cell-mediated cytotoxicity.

Authors:  A Laatikainen; L Schultz-Suhonen; R Mäntyjärvi
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 6.968

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.