Literature DB >> 23067063

Object-based benefits without object-based representations.

Daryl Fougnie1, Sarah M Cormiea, George A Alvarez.   

Abstract

Influential theories of visual working memory have proposed that the basic units of memory are integrated object representations. Key support for this proposal is provided by the same object benefit: It is easier to remember multiple features of a single object than the same set of features distributed across multiple objects. Here, we replicate the object benefit but demonstrate that features are not stored as single, integrated representations. Specifically, participants could remember 10 features better when arranged in 5 objects compared to 10 objects, yet memory for one object feature was largely independent of memory for the other object feature. These results rule out the possibility that integrated representations drive the object benefit and require a revision of the concept of object-based memory representations. We propose that working memory is object-based in regard to the factors that enhance performance but feature based in regard to the level of representational failure. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23067063     DOI: 10.1037/a0030300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  10 in total

1.  The transition from feature to object: Storage unit in visual working memory depends on task difficulty.

Authors:  Jiehui Qian; Ke Zhang; Shengxi Liu; Quan Lei
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

Review 2.  Changing concepts of working memory.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Masud Husain; Paul M Bays
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Strategic trade-offs between quantity and quality in working memory.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; Sarah M Cormiea; Anish Kanabar; George A Alvarez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Remembering complex objects in visual working memory: do capacity limits restrict objects or features?

Authors:  Kyle O Hardman; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Non-binding relationship between visual features.

Authors:  Dragan Rangelov; Semir Zeki
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  A probabilistic palimpsest model of visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Loic Matthey; Paul M Bays; Peter Dayan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Neural Architecture for Feature Binding in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneegans; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Real-World Objects Are Represented in Visual Long-Term Memory Both as Unbound Features and as Bound Objects.

Authors:  Christof Kuhbandner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-12-07

9.  Real-world objects are not stored in holistic representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Yuri A Markov; Igor S Utochkin; Timothy F Brady
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Mechanisms of feature binding in visual working memory are stable over long delays.

Authors:  Georgina Brown; Iham Kasem; Paul M Bays; Sebastian Schneegans
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.