Literature DB >> 23066987

Gastric secretion does not affect the reliability of the 13C-acetate breath test: A validation of the 13C-acetate breath test by magnetic resonance imaging.

S Kuyumcu1, O Goetze, D Menne, R Treier, P Boesiger, M Fox, M Fried, W Schwizer, A Steingoetter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: (13)C-Acetate labeled meals are widely used to determine meal emptying by means of analyzing resulting (13)CO(2) exhalation dynamics. In contrast to the underlying metabolic processes, only few (13)C breath test meal emptying studies have focused on intragastric processes that may alter (13)CO(2) exhalation. This work assessed the effect of enhanced gastric secretion on the reliability of half emptying time (t50) measurements by (13)C-acetate breath test.
METHODS: (13)CO(2) exhalation data were acquired in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over gastric emptying study in 12 healthy volunteers receiving either pentagastrin or placebo intravenously. The standard method proposed by Ghoos et al. was applied to calculate t50 (t50_Ghoos) from (13)CO(2) exhalation data, which were compared and tested for agreement to meal half emptying times (t50_MV) from concurrent recorded MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) volume data. In addition, the accumulated gastric secretion volumes during infusion as detected by MRI (AUC_SV(60)) were correlated with the corresponding cumulative percent (13)C doses recovered (cPDR(60)). KEY
RESULTS: t50_Ghoos and t50_MV showed a linear correlation with a slope of 1.1 ± 0.3 (r(2) = 0.67), however, a positive offset of 136 min for t50_Ghoos. No correlation was detected between AUC_SV(60) and cPDR(60) (r(2) = 0.11). Both, breath test and MRI, revealed a prolonged t50 under pentagastrin infusion with median differences in t50_Ghoos of 45[28-84] min (P = 0.002) and t50_MV of 39[28-52] min (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: This study suggests that (13)CO(2) exhalation after ingestion of a (13) C-labeled liquid test meal is not affected by stimulated gastric secretion, but is rather reflecting the dynamics of meal or caloric emptying from the stomach.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23066987     DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  2 in total

1.  Mechanisms Regulating Insulin Response to Intragastric Glucose in Lean and Non-Diabetic Obese Subjects: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Trial.

Authors:  Anne Christin Meyer-Gerspach; Lucian Cajacob; Daniele Riva; Raphael Herzog; Juergen Drewe; Christoph Beglinger; Bettina K Wölnerhanssen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers of gastrointestinal motor function and fluid distribution.

Authors:  Asseel Khalaf; Caroline L Hoad; Robin C Spiller; Penny A Gowland; Gordon W Moran; Luca Marciani
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2015-11-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.