Literature DB >> 23066818

Non-linear dynamical signal characterization for prediction of defibrillation success through machine learning.

Sharad Shandilya1, Kevin Ward, Michael Kurz, Kayvan Najarian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) is a common presenting dysrhythmia in the setting of cardiac arrest whose main treatment is defibrillation through direct current countershock to achieve return of spontaneous circulation. However, often defibrillation is unsuccessful and may even lead to the transition of VF to more nefarious rhythms such as asystole or pulseless electrical activity. Multiple methods have been proposed for predicting defibrillation success based on examination of the VF waveform. To date, however, no analytical technique has been widely accepted. We developed a unique approach of computational VF waveform analysis, with and without addition of the signal of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2), using advanced machine learning algorithms. We compare these results with those obtained using the Amplitude Spectral Area (AMSA) technique.
METHODS: A total of 90 pre-countershock ECG signals were analyzed form an accessible preshosptial cardiac arrest database. A unified predictive model, based on signal processing and machine learning, was developed with time-series and dual-tree complex wavelet transform features. Upon selection of correlated variables, a parametrically optimized support vector machine (SVM) model was trained for predicting outcomes on the test sets. Training and testing was performed with nested 10-fold cross validation and 6-10 features for each test fold.
RESULTS: The integrative model performs real-time, short-term (7.8 second) analysis of the Electrocardiogram (ECG). For a total of 90 signals, 34 successful and 56 unsuccessful defibrillations were classified with an average Accuracy and Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 82.2% and 85%, respectively. Incorporation of the end-tidal carbon dioxide signal boosted Accuracy and ROC AUC to 83.3% and 93.8%, respectively, for a smaller dataset containing 48 signals. VF analysis using AMSA resulted in accuracy and ROC AUC of 64.6% and 60.9%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: We report the development and first-use of a nontraditional non-linear method of analyzing the VF ECG signal, yielding high predictive accuracies of defibrillation success. Furthermore, incorporation of features from the PetCO2 signal noticeably increased model robustness. These predictive capabilities should further improve with the availability of a larger database.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23066818      PMCID: PMC3502402          DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak        ISSN: 1472-6947            Impact factor:   2.796


  20 in total

1.  Resuscitation after cardiac arrest: a 3-phase time-sensitive model.

Authors:  Myron L Weisfeldt; Lance B Becker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  The dynamics of cardiac fibrillation.

Authors:  James N Weiss; Zhilin Qu; Peng-Sheng Chen; Shien-Fong Lin; Hrayr S Karagueuzian; Hideki Hayashi; Alan Garfinkel; Alain Karma
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-08-23       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  First documented rhythm and clinical outcome from in-hospital cardiac arrest among children and adults.

Authors:  Vinay M Nadkarni; Gregory Luke Larkin; Mary Ann Peberdy; Scott M Carey; William Kaye; Mary E Mancini; Graham Nichol; Tanya Lane-Truitt; Jerry Potts; Joseph P Ornato; Robert A Berg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Distribution of excitation frequencies on the epicardial and endocardial surfaces of fibrillating ventricular wall of the sheep heart.

Authors:  A V Zaitsev; O Berenfeld; S F Mironov; J Jalife; A M Pertsov
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2000-03-03       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Improved prediction of defibrillation success for out-of-hospital VF cardiac arrest using wavelet transform methods.

Authors:  James N Watson; Nopadol Uchaipichat; Paul S Addison; Gareth R Clegg; Colin E Robertson; Trygve Eftestol; Petter A Steen
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.262

6.  Practical issues in the evaluation of methods for the prediction of shock outcome success in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.

Authors:  J N Watson; P S Addison; G R Clegg; P A Steen; C E Robertson
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring in emergency medicine, Part 2: Clinical applications.

Authors:  K R Ward; D M Yealy
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Estimating effectiveness of cardiac arrest interventions: a logistic regression survival model.

Authors:  T D Valenzuela; D J Roe; S Cretin; D W Spaite; M P Larsen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-11-18       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Prediction of countershock success using single features from multiple ventricular fibrillation frequency bands and feature combinations using neural networks.

Authors:  Andreas Neurauter; Trygve Eftestøl; Jo Kramer-Johansen; Benjamin S Abella; Kjetil Sunde; Volker Wenzel; Karl H Lindner; Joar Eilevstjønn; Helge Myklebust; Petter A Steen; Hans-Ulrich Strohmenger
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 5.262

10.  End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring in emergency medicine, Part 1: Basic principles.

Authors:  K R Ward; D M Yealy
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.451

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Using the features of the time and volumetric capnogram for classification and prediction.

Authors:  Michael B Jaffe
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Ventricular Fibrillation Waveform Analysis During Chest Compressions to Predict Survival From Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Jason Coult; Jennifer Blackwood; Lawrence Sherman; Thomas D Rea; Peter J Kudenchuk; Heemun Kwok
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-01

3.  Value of capnography to predict defibrillation success in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Beatriz Chicote; Elisabete Aramendi; Unai Irusta; Pamela Owens; Mohamud Daya; Ahamed Idris
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 4.  Biomedical informatics for computer-aided decision support systems: a survey.

Authors:  Ashwin Belle; Mark A Kon; Kayvan Najarian
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-02-04

5.  An activity recognition model using inertial sensor nodes in a wireless sensor network for frozen shoulder rehabilitation exercises.

Authors:  Hsueh-Chun Lin; Shu-Yin Chiang; Kai Lee; Yao-Chiang Kan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Combining Amplitude Spectrum Area with Previous Shock Information Using Neural Networks Improves Prediction Performance of Defibrillation Outcome for Subsequent Shocks in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients.

Authors:  Mi He; Yubao Lu; Lei Zhang; Hehua Zhang; Yushun Gong; Yongqin Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  [Adult advanced life support].

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Bernd W Böttiger; Pierre Carli; Keith Couper; Charles D Deakin; Therese Djärv; Carsten Lott; Theresa Olasveengen; Peter Paal; Tommaso Pellis; Gavin D Perkins; Claudio Sandroni; Jerry P Nolan
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 0.826

8.  Adult Advanced Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Katherine M Berg; Lars W Andersen; Bernd W Böttiger; Sofia Cacciola; Clifton W Callaway; Keith Couper; Tobias Cronberg; Sonia D'Arrigo; Charles D Deakin; Michael W Donnino; Ian R Drennan; Asger Granfeldt; Cornelia W E Hoedemaekers; Mathias J Holmberg; Cindy H Hsu; Marlijn Kamps; Szymon Musiol; Kevin J Nation; Robert W Neumar; Tonia Nicholson; Brian J O'Neil; Quentin Otto; Edison Ferreira de Paiva; Michael J A Parr; Joshua C Reynolds; Claudio Sandroni; Barnaby R Scholefield; Markus B Skrifvars; Tzong-Luen Wang; Wolfgang A Wetsch; Joyce Yeung; Peter T Morley; Laurie J Morrison; Michelle Welsford; Mary Fran Hazinski; Jerry P Nolan
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  Combining multiple ECG features does not improve prediction of defibrillation outcome compared to single features in a large population of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.

Authors:  Mi He; Yushun Gong; Yongqin Li; Tommaso Mauri; Francesca Fumagalli; Marcella Bozzola; Giancarlo Cesana; Roberto Latini; Antonio Pesenti; Giuseppe Ristagno
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Integration of Attributes from Non-Linear Characterization of Cardiovascular Time-Series for Prediction of Defibrillation Outcomes.

Authors:  Sharad Shandilya; Michael C Kurz; Kevin R Ward; Kayvan Najarian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.