Literature DB >> 23066666

The 'Can't Intubate Can't Oxygenate' scenario in Pediatric Anesthesia: a comparison of different devices for needle cricothyroidotomy.

Jonathan Stacey1, Andrew M B Heard, Gordon Chapman, Catherine J Wallace, Mary Hegarty, Shyan Vijayasekaran, Britta S von Ungern-Sternberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little evidence exists to guide the management of the 'Can't Intubate, Can't Oxygenate' (CICO) scenario in pediatric anesthesia.
OBJECTIVES: To compare two intravenous cannulae for ease of use, success rate and complication rate in needle tracheotomy in a postmortem animal model of the infant airway, and trial a commercially available device using the same model.
METHODS: Two experienced proceduralists repeatedly attempted cannula tracheotomy in five postmortem rabbits, alternately using 18-gauge (18G) and 14-gauge (14G) BD Insyte(™) cannulae (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Attempts began at the first tracheal cartilage, with subsequent attempts progressively more caudad. Success was defined as intratracheal cannula placement. In each rabbit, an attempt was then made by each proceduralist to perform a cannula tracheotomy using the Quicktrach Child(™) device (VBM Medizintechnik GmbH, Sulz am Neckar, Germany).
RESULTS: The rabbit tracheas were of similar dimensions to a human infant. 60 attempts were made at cannula tracheotomy, yielding a 60% success rate. There was no significant difference in success rate, ease of use, or complication rate between cannulae of different gauge. Successful aspiration was highly predictive (positive predictive value 97%) and both sensitive (89%) and specific (96%) for tracheal cannulation. The posterior tracheal wall was perforated in 42% of tracheal punctures. None of 13 attempts using the Quicktrach Child(™) were successful.
CONCLUSION: Cannula tracheotomy in a model comparable to the infant airway is difficult and not without complication. Cannulae of 14- and 18-gauge appear to offer similar performance. Successful aspiration is the key predictor of appropriate cannula placement. The Quicktrach Child was not used successfully in this model. Further work is required to compare possible management strategies for the CICO scenario.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23066666     DOI: 10.1111/pan.12048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  5 in total

Review 1.  Management of the Difficult Airway in the Pediatric Patient.

Authors:  Senthil G Krishna; Jason F Bryant; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2018-01-28

2.  All India Difficult Airway Association 2016 guidelines for the management of unanticipated difficult tracheal intubation in Paediatrics.

Authors:  Dilip K Pawar; Jeson Rajan Doctor; Ubaradka S Raveendra; Singaravelu Ramesh; Sumalatha Radhakrishna Shetty; Jigeeshu Vasishtha Divatia; Sheila Nainan Myatra; Amit Shah; Rakesh Garg; Pankaj Kundra; Apeksh Patwa; Syed Moied Ahmed; Sabyasachi Das; Venkateswaran Ramkumar
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-12

3.  A Primer for Pediatric Emergency Front-of-the-Neck Access.

Authors:  Joana Berger-Estilita; Vivian Wenzel; Markus M Luedi; Thomas Riva
Journal:  A A Pract       Date:  2021-04-06

4.  When can we give general anesthesia to an infant with anticipated difficult airway management caused by facial vascular malformation?

Authors:  Kumi Moriyama; Masanori Mitsuda; Masakazu Kurita; Mine Ozaki; Kiyoshi Moriyama; Tomoko Yorozu
Journal:  JA Clin Rep       Date:  2017-04-04

5.  A Novel 3-Dimensional Printing Fabrication Approach for the Production of Pediatric Airway Models.

Authors:  Andrew D Weatherall; Matthew D Rogerson; Michelle R Quayle; Michael G Cooper; Paul G McMenamin; Justin W Adams
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 6.627

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.