Literature DB >> 23066483

Inverted impacted primary maxillary incisors: a case report.

B Seraj1, S Ghadimi, G Mighani, H Zare, M Rabbani.   

Abstract

Tooth impaction rarely occurs in primary dentition. Most of the primary teeth impactions are seen in second molars. The purpose of this article is to present a 4-year-old girl with bilateral impaction of inverted primary maxillary central incisors which trauma had displaced their tooth germ before erupting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Impaction; Inverted; Primary Central Incisor

Year:  2012        PMID: 23066483      PMCID: PMC3466772     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)        ISSN: 1735-2150


INTRODUCTION

Tooth impaction is a condition in which a tooth fails to erupt into normal position beyond the expected time [1]. Commonly tooth impaction occurs in permanent dentition and rarely happens in primary teeth. Most of the primary teeth impactions are seen in second molars [2-3]. Generally two types of impaction exist: Primary, the tooth has never appeared into the oral cavity which is rare; Secondary, defines teeth which have once erupted, but subsequently appear to have clinically regressed from this position [2-4]. In the literature, several etiologies have been explained for tooth impaction. Overall two etiologies have been explained: local and systemic factors. Local factors such as trauma [4], odontogenic cysts and tumors (dentigerous cyst) [5], odontomas [6,7], ankylosis [8], malformation of the tooth germ, dentofacial incoordination and infection [5,9]. Systemic factors such as alveolar cleft [10], cleidocranial dysplasia and Gardner’s syndrome [5]. The aim of this paper is to present a case with inverted impacted primary maxillary central incisors.

CASE REPORT

A 4-year-old girl was referred to the Pediatric Dentistry Department of Tehran University of Medical Sciences with the chief complaint of upper anterior teeth missing and esthetics problem. Her parents stated that her teeth have never erupted and when their daughter was 8–9-months-old she fell from the stairs and after that her upper lip was swollen. IQ of the patient was normal and the family and medical histories were not remarkable. In the intraoral examination, the child’s occlusion was mesial step and there were some carious teeth in the oral cavity. The maxillary incisors were absent and gingival tissues in this region had a normal color and seemed bulgy without any pain in palpation (Figure 1).
Fig 1

Intra oral examination showed bulgy tissue in the maxillary incisor region

Radiographic examinations showed inverted incisors with open apexes and incomplete roots and odontoma-like particles were seen near the permanent maxillary incisors (Figure 2).
Fig 2

Radiographic examination showed inverted incisors with open apexes and incomplete roots

Because the child was not cooperative and she needed other dental procedures, surgical removal of the teeth under general anesthesia was decided. This condition was explained to the parents and informed consent was taken. First all carious teeth were restored. Then after elevation of the mucoperiosteal flap in the anterior sextant of the maxilla, the teeth were removed. The teeth were rotated 180° and the palatal and incisal sides were located in the buccal and apical, respectively. Teeth had short roots with open apexes (Figure 3).
Fig 3

Maxillary central incisors with open apexes and incomplete roots removed surgically

After suturing the impression was made. The molds were then used to create Nance appliance because the child was not cooperative and fix appliance was chosen (Figure 4).
Fig 4

The child with Nance appliance in the mouth

After soft tissue healing, the Nance appliance was delivered to the child and oral hygiene instructions were explained to the parents and the child. Moreover, follow-up visits were scheduled for monitoring of the patient (Figure 5).
Fig 5

Radiographic examination after 6 months

In the follow-up visit, the Nance appliance was removed and the abutment teeth were cleaned and fluoride therapy was done, then the Nance appliance was recemented in her mouth.

DISCUSSION

Impaction of permanent teeth is a usual finding, but primary teeth impaction is rare occurring in 1:10,000 of the cases [10, 11]. A few cases of inverted impacted primary maxillary [10, 12] and mandibular central incisors have been reported [4, 13]. In none of them trauma has been mentioned, although it is not completely ruled out as an etiological factor [10]. In our case, the parents have recalled trauma to the teeth, but the impaction was primary, because the teeth have never been seen in the oral cavity. However, trauma can displace tooth germ before erupting and may have impact on the unerupted developing teeth. The outcome of traumatic injuries to the primary teeth is based on personal belief and experience rather than evidence based documents. Partial or complete arrest of root formation is a rare complication after trauma to primary teeth, affecting involved permanent teeth [14]. In this case, the root formations of both primary central incisors were stopped. The close proximity of the developing permanent teeth to the root of the primary teeth may result in an injury to the developing permanent successor. In our case, the effect of trauma was seen in the permanent maxillary central incisor region. Anterior primary maxillary teeth impactions are problematic for both parents and the physician because of its effect on the patient's speech, esthetics, function and psychology. Four treatment options have been suggested for impacted teeth: observation, intervention, relocation and extraction [15]. In this case, the teeth were removed because they were inverted and normal eruption of the teeth would not occur and it seemed that they may interfere with the underlying permanent teeth development and eruption. For esthetically and psychological reasons a Nance appliance was delivered to the patient. Now the child is satisfied with her artificial teeth.

CONCLUSION

Although tooth impaction rarely happens in primary teeth, when dentists encounter to delay eruption, it is important to take a medical and dental history and to evaluate the problem with radiographic examination to rule out or confirm missing or other anomalies. In this case, trauma to the gums displaced the tooth germs before eruption of the teeth.
  13 in total

1.  Unusual impaction of inverted primary incisor: report of case.

Authors:  M Uzamiş; S Olmez; N Er
Journal:  ASDC J Dent Child       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

Review 2.  Treatment options for impacted teeth.

Authors:  C A Frank
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.634

3.  A second deciduous molar impacted in right maxillary sinus: a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  C Y Wang; W C Wu; C S Huang
Journal:  Chang Gung Med J       Date:  2000-12

4.  Inverted impaction of primary incisors: a case report.

Authors:  Gamze Aren; Gülsüm Ak; Tamer Erdem
Journal:  ASDC J Dent Child       Date:  2002 Sep-Dec

5.  Impacted primary mandibular central incisors: case report.

Authors:  Salwa M Darwish; Fouad S Salama
Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.065

6.  An unerupted deciduous molar.

Authors:  G M Raghoebar; G Boering
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1991-04

7.  Primary impaction of primary teeth: a review and report of three cases.

Authors:  S D Bianchi; M Roccuzzo
Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.065

8.  Ankylosis of teeth in the developing dentition.

Authors:  D D Albers
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.677

9.  Management of inverted impacted primary incisors: an unusual case.

Authors:  A Kapur; A Goyal; S Jaffri
Journal:  J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent       Date:  2008-03

Review 10.  Inverted impaction of second premolar: two case reports.

Authors:  Y Kuba; K Taniguchi; H Kuboyama; W Motokawa; R L Braham
Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.065

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.