Literature DB >> 23066326

Evaluation of a new method for placing nasojejunal feeding tubes.

Hua Qin1, Xiao-Yun Lu, Qiu Zhao, De-Min Li, Pei-Yuan Li, Mei Liu, Qi Zhou, Liang Zhu, Hui-Fang Pang, Hui-Zhen Zhao.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare fluoroscopic, endoscopic and guide wire assistance with ultraslim gastroscopy for placement of nasojejunal feeding tubes.
METHODS: The information regarding nasojejunal tube placement procedures was retrieved using the gastrointestinal tract database at Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College. Records from 81 patients who underwent nasojejunal tubes placement by different techniques between 2004 and 2011 were reviewed for procedure success and tube-related outcomes.
RESULTS: Nasojejunal feeding tubes were successfully placed in 78 (96.3%) of 81 patients. The success rate by fluoroscopy was 92% (23 of 25), by endoscopic technique 96.3% (26 of 27), and by guide wire assistance (whether via transnasal or transoral insertion) 100% (23/23, 6/6). The average time for successful placement was 14.9 ± 2.9 min for fluoroscopic placement, 14.8 ± 4.9 min for endoscopic placement, 11.1 ± 2.2 min for guide wire assistance with transnasal gastroscopic placement, and 14.7 ± 1.2 min for transoral gastroscopic placement. Statistically, the duration for the third method was significantly different (P < 0.05) compared with the other three methods. Transnasal placement over a guidewire was significantly faster (P < 0.05) than any of the other approaches.
CONCLUSION: Guide wire assistance with transnasal insertion of nasojejunal feeding tubes represents a safe, quick and effective method for providing enteral nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopy; Enteral nutrition; Fluoroscopy; Guide wire assistance; Nasojejunal feeding tube

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23066326      PMCID: PMC3468864          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i37.5295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  27 in total

1.  Enteral feeding: a change in practice.

Authors:  C Anderson
Journal:  J Child Health Care       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.979

2.  Endoscopic placement of nasojejunal tubes: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial comparing suitability and technical success for two different tubes.

Authors:  Dieter Schwab; Steffen Mühldorfer; Gerhard Nusko; Martin Radespiel-Tröger; Eckhart G Hahn; Richard Strauss
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Guidelines for enteral feeding in adult hospital patients.

Authors:  M Stroud; H Duncan; J Nightingale
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Transnasal endoscopic placement of feeding tubes in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Stephen J D O'Keefe; William Foody; Satinder Gill
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Early nasojejunal feeding in acute pancreatitis is associated with a lower complication rate.

Authors:  Attila Oláh; Gábor Pardavi; Tibor Belágyi; Attila Nagy; Akos Issekutz; Gamal E Mohamed
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.008

Review 6.  Establishment of enteral nutrition: prokinetic agents and small bowel feeding tubes.

Authors:  Andrew R Davies; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.687

7.  Caloric intake in medical ICU patients: consistency of care with guidelines and relationship to clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Jerry A Krishnan; Pat B Parce; Anthony Martinez; Gregory B Diette; Roy G Brower
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Gastric versus small-bowel tube feeding in the intensive care unit: a prospective comparison of efficacy.

Authors:  Daniel A Neumann; Mark H DeLegge
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Comparison of direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy and PEG with jejunal extension.

Authors:  Andy C Fan; Todd H Baron; Ashwin Rumalla; Gavin C Harewood
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Hypocaloric jejunal feeding is better than total parenteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis: results of a randomized comparative study.

Authors:  Souheil Abou-Assi; Kimberly Craig; Stephen J D O'Keefe
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  4 in total

1.  Application of bronchoscope for the placement of nasoenteric feeding tube: new ideas from old ways.

Authors:  Ching Feng Wu; Yin-Kai Chao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Application of bronchoscope for the placement of nasoenteric feeding tube in patients with esophagectomy: a novel technique.

Authors:  Hai-Xia Cao; Wei Zhang; Jun Zhang; Xiong-Huai Hua; Jian-Jun Qin; Yin Li
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Electromagnetic-guided versus endoscopic-guided postpyloric placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes.

Authors:  Jun Watanabe; Eiichi Kakehi; Masaru Okamoto; Shizukiyo Ishikawa; Yuki Kataoka
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-10-03

4.  A novel quick transendoscopic enteral tubing in mid-gut: technique and training with video.

Authors:  Chuyan Long; Yan Yu; Bota Cui; Sabreen Abdul Rahman Jagessar; Jie Zhang; Guozhong Ji; Guangming Huang; Faming Zhang
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.067

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.