Literature DB >> 23065878

Long-term results of acute prosthetic joint infection treated with debridement and prosthesis retention: a case-control study.

Lluís Font-Vizcarra1, Sebastián García, Guillem Bori, Juan Carlos Martinez-Pastor, Alonso Zumbado, Laura Morata, Josep Mensa, Alex Soriano.   

Abstract

PURPOSES: To evaluate the long-term outcome (at least 4 years) of patients who underwent a surgical debridement due to an acute prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and to compare them with a control group that did not have an acute septic complication.
METHODS: From January 1999 to December 2007, 61 patients with an acute PJI in remission after 2 years of follow-up (cases) were retrospectively reviewed and compared with a control group (2:1) without an acute PJI matched by age, year of arthroplasty, and type of prosthesis. Septic and aseptic complications of each group were gathered and compared using a chi-square test. A two-tailed p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Out of 183 patients, 4 cases and 2 controls were excluded due to death or lost to follow up; 113 (63.8%) were females and 109 (61.5%) had a knee replacement. The mean age and time of followup were 68.3 and 6.4 years, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between cases and controls in the percentage of late septic or aseptic loosening. However, the late relapse rate in patients with acute PJI caused by S. aureus, was 12.5% (2 out of 16) and there was a trend towards significance when compared with the rest of the cohort (3.3%, p = 0.09). Aseptic late complications were more frequent in GN-cases (10.7%) than in the other groups (3.4% in GP-cases and 5% in controls) but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.19).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, although analyzing all late complications together, patients with an acute PJI have a similar long-term outcome in comparison with controls; patients with an acute PJI due to S. aureus had a higher late relapse rate; and GN-cases developed an aseptic loosening more ?frequently. In the future, it is necessary to evaluate larger series to confirm our results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23065878     DOI: 10.5301/ijao.5000147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Artif Organs        ISSN: 0391-3988            Impact factor:   1.595


  4 in total

1.  Use of cemented spacer with a handmade stem to treat acute periprosthetic tibial fracture infection: a case report.

Authors:  Lluís Font-Vizcarra; Oscar Izquierdo; Laura García-Nuño; Araceli González; Vicenç Diaz-Brito; Juan Castellanos
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2014-01-24

Review 2.  Periprosthetic joint infections: clinical and bench research.

Authors:  Laurence Legout; Eric Senneville
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-10-27

3.  Tissue damage drives co-localization of NF-κB, Smad3, and Nrf2 to direct Rev-erb sensitive wound repair in mouse macrophages.

Authors:  Dawn Z Eichenfield; Ty Dale Troutman; Verena M Link; Michael T Lam; Han Cho; David Gosselin; Nathanael J Spann; Hanna P Lesch; Jenhan Tao; Jun Muto; Richard L Gallo; Ronald M Evans; Christopher K Glass
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Local antibiotic treatment with calcium sulfate as carrier material improves the outcome of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention procedures for periprosthetic joint infections after hip arthroplasty - a retrospective study.

Authors:  Katharina Reinisch; Michel Schläppi; Christoph Meier; Peter Wahl
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2022-01-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.