Literature DB >> 2306583

Testing a policy for skull radiography (and admission) following mild head injury.

G de Lacey1, M McCabe, O Constant, T Welch, C Spinks, E McNally.   

Abstract

There has been, and continues to be, conflicting advice regarding skull radiography following an apparently uncomplicated head injury. Policies on admission are often ill defined. In 1983, representatives of the Royal College of Radiologists met neurosurgeons at a seminar in Harrogate organized by the DHSS and laid down clear, but little publicized, joint recommendations: "The Harrogate Criteria". The survey described here evaluated an existing liberal policy for skull radiography (and a loose policy for admissions) against these recommendations, and it was concluded that the number of patients having skull radiography (74% of head injury attenders) was excessive. Measured against the "Harrogate Criteria", requests for 36% of the adult and 47% of children's skull radiographs did not fulfil these criteria. As a corollary, it was also concluded that loose admissions policies could usefully be altered to comply more closely with the Harrogate recommendations. This would not necessarily reduce the numbers admitted, but would provide casualty officers with a framework on which to base this crucial aspect of clinical decision making, where presently there is often very little structure at all. The authors suggest that all the options have not been fully explored, and that a simple but important alteration to the Harrogate guidelines would provide an even closer link between policy on skull radiography and patient admission. Specifically, most patients who are to be admitted do not need skull radiographs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2306583     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-63-745-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  8 in total

1.  [Roentgen studies of the skull in head injuries--a multicenter study].

Authors:  J Windolf; R Inglis; A Pannike; U Inglis; U Gerlach; S Gottschalk; J Kieseleczuk; M Krieger; H Langwara; M Schnabel
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1992-02

2.  Head injuries: a study evaluating the impact of the NICE head injury guidelines.

Authors:  Z Hassan; M Smith; S Littlewood; O Bouamra; D Hughes; C Biggin; K Amos; A D Mendelow; F Lecky
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 3.  The management of minor traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  P J Hutchinson; P J Kirkpatrick; J Addison; S Jackson; J D Pickard
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1998-03

4.  Relative risk of deterioration after mild closed head injury.

Authors:  S T Lee; T N Liu; C W Wong; Y S Yeh; W C Tzaan
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Effect of guidelines on management of head injury on record keeping and decision making in accident and emergency departments.

Authors:  R Thomson; J Gray; R Madhok; A Mordue; A D Mendelow
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-06

6.  Skull X-ray after head injury: the recommendations of the Royal College of Surgeons Working Party report in practice.

Authors:  R E MacLaren; H I Ghoorahoo; N G Kirby
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1993-09

7.  The implications of NICE guidelines on the management of children presenting with head injury.

Authors:  J Dunning; J P Daly; R Malhotra; P Stratford-Smith; J-P Lomas; F Lecky; J Batchelor; K Mackway-Jones
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  A meta-analysis of variables that predict significant intracranial injury in minor head trauma.

Authors:  J Dunning; J Batchelor; P Stratford-Smith; S Teece; J Browne; C Sharpin; K Mackway-Jones
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.791

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.