Literature DB >> 23065662

Humeral epiphyseal shape in the felidae: the influence of phylogeny, allometry, and locomotion.

Anthony Walmsley1, Sarah Elton, Julien Louys, Laura C Bishop, Carlo Meloro.   

Abstract

Bone morphology of the cats (Mammalia: Felidae) is influenced by many factors, including locomotor mode, body size, hunting methods, prey size and phylogeny. Here, we investigate the shape of the proximal and distal humeral epiphyses in extant species of the felids, based on two-dimensional landmark configurations. Geometric morphometric techniques were used to describe shape differences in the context of phylogeny, allometry and locomotion. The influence of these factors on epiphyseal shape was assessed using Principal Component Analysis, Linear Discriminant functions and multivariate regression. Phylogenetic Generalised Least Squares was used to examine the association between size or locomotion and humeral epiphyseal shape, after taking a phylogenetic error term into account. Results show marked differences in epiphyseal shape between felid lineages, with a relatively large phylogenetic influence. Additionally, the adaptive influences of size and locomotion are demonstrated, and their influence is independent of phylogeny in most, but not all, cases. Several features of epiphyseal shape are common to the largest terrestrial felids, including a relative reduction in the surface area of the humeral head and increased robusticity of structures that provide attachment for joint-stabilising muscles, including the medial epicondyle and the greater and lesser tubercles. This increased robusticity is a functional response to the increased loading forces placed on the joints due to large body mass.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23065662     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.20084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  7 in total

1.  Exploring morphological generality in the Old World monkey postcranium using an ecomorphological framework.

Authors:  Sarah Elton; Anna-Ulla Jansson; Carlo Meloro; Julien Louys; Thomas Plummer; Laura C Bishop
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Do constraints associated with the locomotor habitat drive the evolution of forelimb shape? A case study in musteloid carnivorans.

Authors:  Anne-Claire Fabre; Raphael Cornette; Anjali Goswami; Stéphane Peigné
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Quantitative inferences on the locomotor behaviour of extinct species applied to Simocyon batalleri (Ailuridae, Late Miocene, Spain).

Authors:  Anne-Claire Fabre; Manuel J Salesa; Raphael Cornette; Mauricio Antón; Jorge Morales; Stéphane Peigné
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2015-05-13

4.  A three-dimensional analysis of morphological evolution and locomotor performance of the carnivoran forelimb.

Authors:  Alberto Martín-Serra; Borja Figueirido; Paul Palmqvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A three-dimensional analysis of the morphological evolution and locomotor behaviour of the carnivoran hind limb.

Authors:  Alberto Martín-Serra; Borja Figueirido; Paul Palmqvist
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Shape Covariation (or the Lack Thereof) Between Vertebrae and Other Skeletal Traits in Felids: The Whole is Not Always Greater than the Sum of Parts.

Authors:  Marcela Randau; Anjali Goswami
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.119

7.  Postcranial elements of small mammals as indicators of locomotion and habitat.

Authors:  Christine M Janis; Alberto Martín-Serra
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.