Literature DB >> 23065172

Challenges of pelvic imaging in obese women.

Phyllis Glanc1, Bonnie E O'Hayon, Diljeet K Singh, Syed A J Bokhari, Cynthia V Maxwell.   

Abstract

Obesity is a major global health concern affecting all ages, socioeconomic groups, and countries. Although men have higher rates of overweight, women have higher rates of obesity. In the United States, more than 60% of women are overweight or obese, with slightly more than one-third considered frankly obese. Obesity is a major risk factor for noncommunicable diseases such as diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, stroke, and specific cancers. Obesity is associated with increased mortality for all cancers, with the highest death rates occurring in the heaviest women. Obesity can contribute to missed diagnoses, nondiagnostic results of imaging studies, imaging examination cancellation because of weight or girth restrictions, scheduling of inappropriate examinations, and increased radiation dose exposure. The utility of the clinical examination is often limited in the obese woman, which results in an even greater reliance on imaging; however, the obese woman may experience a lowered quality of and less access to medical imaging. Recognition of equipment limitations, imaging artifacts, optimization techniques, and appropriateness of modality choices is critical to providing good patient care to this health-challenged group. The clinical indication, the patient's weight, and the body diameters are three key factors to consider when choosing the most appropriate examination. Familiarity with the optimization of imaging techniques across all modalities is important to convert potentially suboptimal examinations into diagnostic-quality studies. The aim of this review is to identify key areas in which obesity affects the imaging care of women with pelvic conditions and to outline strategies to address these areas. © RSNA, 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23065172     DOI: 10.1148/rg.326125510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  5 in total

1.  Is the Implant in Bone? The Accuracy of CT and Fluoroscopic Imaging for Detecting Malpositioned Pelvic Screw and SI Fusion Implants.

Authors:  Jose E San Miguel-Ruiz; David Polly; Melissa Albersheim; Jonathan Sembrano; Takashi Takahashi; Paul Lender; Christopher T Martin
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2021

Review 2.  Obese patients and radiography literature: what do we know about a big issue?

Authors:  Nhat Tan Thanh Le; John Robinson; Sarah J Lewis
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2015-05-06

3.  Effect of patient size on image quality in radiotherapy kV planar verification imaging: a phantom study.

Authors:  Sara Chan; Eileen Giles; Lyndal Newmarch; Michala Short
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2019-10-16

4.  Ultrasonographic Visualization of the Ovaries to Detect Ovarian Cancer According to Age, Menopausal Status and Body Type.

Authors:  Edward J Pavlik; Emily Brekke; Justin Gorski; Lauren Baldwin-Branch; Rachel Miller; Christopher P DeSimone; Charles S Dietrich; Holly S Gallion; Frederick Rand Ueland; John R van Nagell
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-06

5.  Subsequent Ultrasonographic Non-Visualization of the Ovaries Is Hastened in Women with Only One Ovary Visualized Initially.

Authors:  Edward J Pavlik; Hannah Fancher; Charles S Dietrich; John R van Nagell
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.