Literature DB >> 23065164

MR imaging of endometriosis: ten imaging pearls.

Evan S Siegelman1, Edward R Oliver.   

Abstract

Endometriosis, which is defined as the presence of ectopic endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterus, is a common cause of pelvic pain and infertility, affecting as many as 10% of premenopausal women. Because its effects may be devastating, radiologists should be familiar with the various imaging manifestations of the disease, especially those that allow its differentiation from other pelvic lesions. The "pearls" offered here are observations culled from the authors' experience with the use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the detection and characterization of pelvic endometriosis. First, the inclusion of T1-weighted fat-suppressed sequences is recommended for all MR examinations of the female pelvis because such sequences facilitate the detection of small endometriomas and aid in their differentiation from mature cystic teratomas. Second, it must be remembered that benign endometriomas, like many pelvic malignancies, may exhibit restricted diffusion. Although women with endometriosis are at risk for developing clear cell and endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancers (ie, endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers), imaging findings such as enhancing mural nodules should be confirmed before a diagnosis of ovarian malignancy is offered. The presence of a dilated fallopian tube, especially one containing hemorrhagic content, is often associated with pelvic endometriosis. Deep (solid infiltrating) endometriosis can involve the pelvic ligaments, anterior rectosigmoid colon, bladder, uterus, and cul-de-sac, as well as surgical scars; the lesions often have poorly defined margins and T2 signal hypointensity as a result of fibrosis. The presence of subcentimeter foci with T2 hyperintensity representing ectopic endometrial glands within these infiltrating fibrotic masses may help establish the diagnosis. © RSNA, 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23065164     DOI: 10.1148/rg.326125518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  28 in total

1.  Diagnostic confidence analysis in the magnetic resonance imaging of ovarian and deep endometriosis: comparison with surgical results.

Authors:  Luca Saba; Rosa Sulcis; Gian Benedetto Melis; Giannina Ibba; Juan Luis Alcazar; Mario Piga; Stefano Guerriero
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Shining light in a dark landscape: MRI evaluation of unusual localization of endometriosis.

Authors:  Benedetta Gui; Anna Lia Valentini; Valeria Ninivaggi; Maura Miccò; Viola Zecchi; Pier Paolo Grimaldi; Francesco Cambi; Maurizio Guido; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 3.  Systematic radiological approach to utero-ovarian pathologies.

Authors:  Olivera Nikolic; Marijana Basta Nikolic; Aleksandar Spasic; Mila Milagros Otero-Garcia; Sanja Stojanovic
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Deep infiltrating endometriosis: role of magnetic resonance subtraction imaging.

Authors:  Darshan Gandhi; Gunjan Garg; Shantanu Solanki; Pankaj Nepal
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-08

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of acquired disorders of the pediatric female pelvis other than neoplasm.

Authors:  Mougnyan Cox; Sharon W Gould; Daniel J Podberesky; Monica Epelman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-05-26

6.  Author's Reply.

Authors:  Benedetta Gui
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 7.  How embryology knowledge can help radiologists in the differential diagnosis of canal of Nuck pathologies.

Authors:  Francesca Rosa; Carola Martinetti; Maria Ala Veirana; Ali Attieh; Alessandra Trisoglio; Rossana Sabattini; Nicoletta Gandolfo; Alessandro Gastaldo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 8.  Beyond adenocarcinoma: MRI of uncommon rectal neoplasms and mimickers.

Authors:  David D B Bates; Maria Clara Fernandes de Paula; Natally Horvat; Shannon Sheedy; Chandana Lall; Zahra Kassam; Perry Pickhardt; Neeraj Lalwani; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Iva Petkovska
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-11

Review 9.  Pitfalls of diffusion-weighted imaging of the female pelvis.

Authors:  Ana Luisa Duarte; João Lopes Dias; Teresa Margarida Cunha
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

Review 10.  Identifying the deceiver: the non-neoplastic mimickers of genital system neoplasms.

Authors:  Omer Onder; Ali Devrim Karaosmanoglu; Jessica Kraeft; Aycan Uysal; Musturay Karcaaltincaba; Deniz Akata; Mustafa Nasuh Ozmen; Peter F Hahn
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.