BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an accurate method for cytological confirmation of pancreatic malignancy, but peritoneal dissemination caused by EUS-FNA could be a matter of concern because it may lead to poorer prognosis. Our aim was to estimate the risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis by EUS-FNA for pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Two hundred and seventeen patients with cytopathologically proven pancreatic cancer in a tertiary referral center were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into two groups: 161 patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) alone (ERCP group), and 56 patients who had ever undergone EUS-FNA (EUS-FNA group). Peritoneal carcinomatosis was diagnosed by computed tomography and/or cytology during follow-up. Hazard ratios of factors including EUS-FNA for the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis were analyzed by the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between ERCP and EUS-FNA groups. Peritoneal carcinomatosis developed in 14.9 % (24/161) during an average follow-up period of 545 days, and 17.9 % (10/56) during 599 days among ERCP and EUS-FNA group, respectively. The EUS-FNA was not identified as a significant risk factor with hazard ratios (HR) of 1.07 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.51-2.25, p = 0.85] by univariate analysis and 1.35 (95 % CI 0.62-2.95, p = 0.45) by multivariate analysis. Nodal involvement (HR 2.19, 95 % CI 1.03-4.63, p = 0.04) and non-resection (HR 2.64, 95 % CI 1.11-6.25, p = 0.03) were shown to be statistically significant risk factors by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA for pancreatic cancer did not significantly increase the risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis.
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an accurate method for cytological confirmation of pancreatic malignancy, but peritoneal dissemination caused by EUS-FNA could be a matter of concern because it may lead to poorer prognosis. Our aim was to estimate the risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis by EUS-FNA for pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Two hundred and seventeen patients with cytopathologically proven pancreatic cancer in a tertiary referral center were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into two groups: 161 patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) alone (ERCP group), and 56 patients who had ever undergone EUS-FNA (EUS-FNA group). Peritoneal carcinomatosis was diagnosed by computed tomography and/or cytology during follow-up. Hazard ratios of factors including EUS-FNA for the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis were analyzed by the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between ERCP and EUS-FNA groups. Peritoneal carcinomatosis developed in 14.9 % (24/161) during an average follow-up period of 545 days, and 17.9 % (10/56) during 599 days among ERCP and EUS-FNA group, respectively. The EUS-FNA was not identified as a significant risk factor with hazard ratios (HR) of 1.07 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.51-2.25, p = 0.85] by univariate analysis and 1.35 (95 % CI 0.62-2.95, p = 0.45) by multivariate analysis. Nodal involvement (HR 2.19, 95 % CI 1.03-4.63, p = 0.04) and non-resection (HR 2.64, 95 % CI 1.11-6.25, p = 0.03) were shown to be statistically significant risk factors by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA for pancreatic cancer did not significantly increase the risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Authors: Janak N Shah; Douglas Fraker; DuPont Guerry; Michael Feldman; Michael L Kochman Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Wee-Chian Lim; Julia K Leblanc; John M Chappo; Thomas J Howard; Stuart Sherman Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Carlos Micames; Paul S Jowell; Rebekah White; Erik Paulson; Rendon Nelson; Michael Morse; Herbert Hurwitz; Theodore Pappas; Douglas Tyler; Kevin McGrath Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Shyam Varadarajulu; Shilpa Desai; Rhett Shirley; Martin J Heslin; Mohit Mehra; Juan P Arnoletti; Isam Eltoum; Charles M Wilcox; Selwyn M Vickers Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: M Al-Haddad; M B Wallace; T A Woodward; S A Gross; C M Hodgens; R D Toton; M Raimondo Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2007-12-04 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Leticia Perondi Luz; Mohammad Ali Al-Haddad; Michael Sai Lai Sey; John M DeWitt Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-06-28 Impact factor: 5.742