Literature DB >> 23063933

Detection of an inhibitory cortical gradient underlying peak shift in learning: a neural basis for a false memory.

Alexandre A Miasnikov1, Norman M Weinberger.   

Abstract

Experience often does not produce veridical memory. Understanding false attribution of events constitutes an important problem in memory research. "Peak shift" is a well-characterized, controllable phenomenon in which human and animal subjects that receive reinforcement associated with one sensory stimulus later respond maximally to another stimulus in post-training stimulus generalization tests. Peak shift ordinarily develops in discrimination learning (reinforced CS+, unreinforced CS-) and has long been attributed to the interaction of an excitatory gradient centered on the CS+ and an inhibitory gradient centered on the CS-; the shift is away from the CS-. In contrast, we have obtained peak shifts during single tone frequency training, using stimulation of the cholinergic nucleus basalis (NB) to implant behavioral memory into the rat. As we also recorded cortical activity, we took the opportunity to investigate the possible existence of a neural frequency gradient that could account for behavioral peak shift. Behavioral frequency generalization gradients (FGGs, interruption of ongoing respiration) were determined twice before training while evoked potentials were recorded from the primary auditory cortex (A1), to obtain a baseline gradient of "habituatory" neural decrement. A post-training behavioral FGG obtained 24h after three daily sessions of a single tone paired with NB stimulation (200 trials/day) revealed a peak shift. The peak of the FGG was at a frequency lower than the CS while the cortical inhibitory gradient was at a frequency higher than the CS frequency. Further analysis indicated that the frequency location and magnitude of the gradient could account for the behavioral peak shift. These results provide a neural basis for a systematic case of memory misattribution and may provide an animal model for the study of the neural bases of a type of "false memory". Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23063933      PMCID: PMC3538826          DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2012.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  45 in total

1.  Induction of behavioral associative memory by stimulation of the nucleus basalis.

Authors:  Dewey E McLin; Alexandre A Miasnikov; Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The role of basal forebrain neurons in tonic and phasic activation of the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  L Détári; D D Rasmusson; K Semba
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  Cholinergic-mediated response enhancement in barrel cortex layer V pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  Angel Nuñez; Soledad Domínguez; Washington Buño; David Fernández de Sevilla
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The level of cholinergic nucleus basalis activation controls the specificity of auditory associative memory.

Authors:  Norman M Weinberger; Alexandre A Miasnikov; Jemmy C Chen
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Activation of muscarinic receptors modulates NMDA receptor-mediated responses in auditory cortex.

Authors:  V B Aramakis; A E Bandrowski; J H Ashe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effects of novelty and habituation on acetylcholine, GABA, and glutamate release from the frontal cortex and hippocampus of freely moving rats.

Authors:  M G Giovannini; A Rakovska; R S Benton; M Pazzagli; L Bianchi; G Pepeu
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Motivationally neutral stimulation of the nucleus basalis induces specific behavioral memory.

Authors:  Alexandre A Miasnikov; Jemmy C Chen; Nataliya Gross; Bonnie S Poytress; Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 8.  Habituation: a history.

Authors:  Richard F Thompson
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Habituation produces frequency-specific plasticity of receptive fields in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  C D Condon; N M Weinberger
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Synaptic depression and short-term habituation are located in the sensory part of the mammalian startle pathway.

Authors:  Nadine S Simons-Weidenmaier; Maruschka Weber; Claudia F Plappert; Peter K D Pilz; Susanne Schmid
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 3.288

View more
  6 in total

1.  Predicting favorable and unfavorable consequences of perceptual learning: worsening and the peak shift.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Learning strategy refinement reverses early sensory cortical map expansion but not behavior: Support for a theory of directed cortical substrates of learning and memory.

Authors:  Gabriel A Elias; Kasia M Bieszczad; Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  Resting state functional connectivity of the basal nucleus of Meynert in humans: in comparison to the ventral striatum and the effects of age.

Authors:  Chiang-shan R Li; Jaime S Ide; Sheng Zhang; Sien Hu; Herta H Chao; Laszlo Zaborszky
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Gamma band plasticity in sensory cortex is a signature of the strongest memory rather than memory of the training stimulus.

Authors:  Norman M Weinberger; Alexandre A Miasnikov; Kasia M Bieszczad; Jemmy C Chen
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Remodeling sensory cortical maps implants specific behavioral memory.

Authors:  K M Bieszczad; A A Miasnikov; N M Weinberger
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Persistent, generalized hypersensitivity of olfactory bulb interneurons after olfactory fear generalization.

Authors:  Marley D Kass; John P McGann
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.877

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.