Literature DB >> 23063418

Marginal survival benefit in the treatment of early hepatocellular carcinoma.

Yutaka Midorikawa1, Tadatoshi Takayama, Kazuaki Shimada, Hisashi Nakayama, Tokio Higaki, Masamichi Moriguchi, Satoshi Nara, Shingo Tsuji, Masatoshi Tanaka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Early treatment has been recommended for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to its high cure rate. However, the reported survival benefits of treating early HCC may be affected by lead time.
METHODS: Early HCC was defined as a well-differentiated cancer containing Glisson's triad (carcinoma in situ). We applied the concept of lead time to chronic liver disease, which is originally the length of time between screen-detected and symptom-detected disease. To evaluate prolongation of survival with treatment of early HCC, survivals of patients with early and overt HCCs smaller than 2.0 cm treated with liver resection were compared. To calculate lead time and survival benefit of liver resection, survivals of untreated early and overt HCC patients were compared.
RESULTS: After liver resection, median overall survival of 46 patients with early HCC (8.8 years; 95% CI, 7.2-11.2) was significantly longer than that of the 202 with overt HCC (6.8 years; 95% CI, 6.2-8.3, p = 0.0257). The prolongation in survival time with liver resection for early HCC was 34.7 (95% CI, 22.1-46.5) months. On the other hand, comparing liver resection and natural history, the survival benefits of surgery for 12 patients with early and 16 with overt HCC were 74.7 (95% CI, 51.9-97.4) and 73.4 (95% CI, 57.9-88.9) months, respectively. Consequently, the lead time and survival benefit with resection for early HCC were estimated as 33.4 (95% CI, 18.9-47.8) and 1.3 (95% CI, -22.1-24.7) months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Survival benefit of resection for early HCC is marginal because of a long lead time, and early HCC is therefore not a target lesion for surgery.
Copyright © 2012 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23063418     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatol        ISSN: 0168-8278            Impact factor:   25.083


  13 in total

Review 1.  Role of surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma based on Japanese clinical guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hisashi Nakayama; Tadatoshi Takayama
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-02-27

2.  Safety margin of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study using magnetic resonance imaging with superparamagnetic iron oxide.

Authors:  Kuniaki Fukuda; Kensaku Mori; Naoyuki Hasegawa; Katsuhiro Nasu; Kazunori Ishige; Yoshikazu Okamoto; Masanari Shiigai; Masato Abei; Manabu Minami; Ichinosuke Hyodo
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Liver Resection Versus Embolization for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yutaka Midorikawa; Tadatoshi Takayama; Masamichi Moriguchi; Rempei Yagi; Shunsuke Yamagishi; Hisashi Nakayama; Osamu Aramaki; Shintaro Yamazaki; Shingo Tsuji; Tokio Higaki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Clinical value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma - with a special emphasis on early hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Masanori Matsuda
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-12-28

5.  No Need of Immediate Treatment for Hypovascular Tumors Associated with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yutaka Midorikawa; Tadatoshi Takayama; Satoshi Nara; Takuya Hashimoto; Kiyohiko Omichi; Kiyoko Ebisawa; Tokio Higaki; Shingo Tsuji; Hirohiko Sakamoto; Kazuaki Shimada; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  The influence of histological differentiation grade on the outcome of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinomas 2 cm or smaller in size.

Authors:  Kazunari Sasaki; Masamichi Matsuda; Yu Ohkura; Yusuke Kawamura; Masafumi Inoue; Masaji Hashimoto; Kenji Ikeda; Hiromitsu Kumada; Goro Watanabe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Poor outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma with stemness marker under hypoxia: resistance to transarterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  Hyungjin Rhee; Ji Hae Nahm; Haeryoung Kim; Gi Hong Choi; Jeong Eun Yoo; Hye Sun Lee; Myoung Ju Koh; Young Nyun Park
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Prognostic Significance of Concurrent Hypovascular and Hypervascular Nodules in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Sadahisa Ogasawara; Tetsuhiro Chiba; Tenyu Motoyama; Naoya Kanogawa; Tomoko Saito; Yusuke Shinozaki; Eiichiro Suzuki; Yoshihiko Ooka; Akinobu Tawada; Hideyuki Kato; Shinichiro Okabe; Fumihiko Kanai; Masaharu Yoshikawa; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Rate of local tumor progression following radiofrequency ablation of pathologically early hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yoshiteru Hao; Kazushi Numata; Tomohiro Ishii; Hiroyuki Fukuda; Shin Maeda; Masayuki Nakano; Katsuaki Tanaka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: 2016 Consensus Recommendations of the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.