Literature DB >> 23063339

Physicians, abortion provision and the legitimacy paradox.

Lisa H Harris1, Lisa Martin, Michelle Debbink, Jane Hassinger.   

Abstract

Physicians who provide abortion care are targets of stigma, harassment and violence. As a result, many providers do not speak openly about their work. We hypothesize that stigma and silence produce a vicious cycle: when abortion providers do not disclose their work in everyday encounters, their silence perpetuates a stereotype that abortion work is unusual or deviant, or that legitimate, mainstream doctors do not perform abortions. This contributes to marginalization of abortion providers within medicine and the ongoing targeting of providers for harassment and violence. This reinforces reluctance to disclose abortion work, and the cycle continues. We call this phenomenon a "legitimacy paradox." The paradox is that although many highly trained, legitimate physicians provide abortion care, abortion providers continue to be depicted as illegitimate, deviant or substandard doctors. The legitimacy paradox has adverse consequences for abortion human resources, for women's experiences of abortion care and for abortion law and policy.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23063339     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  14 in total

1.  Rewriting abortion: deploying medical records in jurisdictional negotiation over a forbidden practice in Senegal.

Authors:  Siri Suh
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  "Post-Roe" Abortion Policy Context Heightens the Imperative for Multilevel, Comprehensive, Integrated Health Education.

Authors:  Whitney S Rice; Subasri Narasimhan; Anna Newton-Levinson; Johanna Pringle; Sara K Redd; Dabney P Evans
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2022-09-29

3.  TRAP laws and the invisible labor of US abortion providers.

Authors:  Rebecca J Mercier; Mara Buchbinder; Amy Bryant
Journal:  Crit Public Health       Date:  2015-08-19

4.  "Prefacing the Script" as an Ethical Response to State-Mandated Abortion Counseling.

Authors:  Mara Buchbinder; Dragana Lassiter; Rebecca Mercier; Amy Bryant; Anne Drapkin Lyerly
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015-02-19

5.  Contraceptive Practices, Preferences, and Barriers Among Abortion Clients in North Carolina.

Authors:  Amy G Bryant; Ilene S Speizer; Jennifer C Hodgkinson; Alison Swiatlo; Siân L Curtis; Krista Perreira
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.954

6.  "No One Does This for the Money or Lifestyle": Abortion Providers' Perspectives on Factors Affecting Workforce Recruitment and Retention in the Southern United States.

Authors:  Pari Chowdhary; Anna Newton-Levinson; Roger Rochat
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2022-01-08

7.  Theorizing Time in Abortion Law and Human Rights.

Authors:  Joanna N Erdman
Journal:  Health Hum Rights       Date:  2017-06

8.  'I am all alone': factors influencing the provision of termination of pregnancy services in two South African provinces.

Authors:  Mantshi E Teffo; Laetitia C Rispel
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.640

9.  Implementation of mifepristone medical abortion in Canada: pilot and feasibility testing of a survey to assess facilitators and barriers.

Authors:  Courtney Devane; Regina M Renner; Sarah Munro; Édith Guilbert; Sheila Dunn; Marie-Soleil Wagner; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2019-11-08

10.  Normalising abortion: what role can health professionals play?

Authors:  Karen J Maxwell; Lesley Hoggart; Fiona Bloomer; Sam Rowlands; Carrie Purcell
Journal:  BMJ Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2020-04-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.