Literature DB >> 23063211

Provider profiling models for acute coronary syndrome mortality using administrative data.

Alex Bottle1, Robert D Sanders, Abdul Mozid, Paul Aylin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Administrative data have been used to construct risk-adjustment models for provider profiling to benchmark hospital performance for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but much less for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We assess the impact on risk model performance and hospital-level mortality rate ratios (SMRs) of three key issues: comorbidity measurement methods, inter-hospital transfers and post-discharge deaths.
METHODS: Logistic regression models for 30-day total mortality used three years of national public hospital emergency (unplanned) admissions data for England for ACS (n=329,369) linked to death registrations. We compared using the Charlson comorbidity index with modelling previous admissions.
RESULTS: Prior admission for various conditions such as cancer and renal failure was associated with higher post-ACS mortality, whereas previous AMIs, PCI and unstable angina admissions were associated with lower mortality. The Charlson comorbidity index performed better than one- and five-year admission histories. Discrimination (c=0.81) was comparable with that from clinical databases. Adjusted 30-day total mortality rates ranged between hospitals from 6.3% to 13.3%. Median differences in SMRs between the comorbidity-adjustment methods were small. Although SMRs and outlier status could change, a hospital's 'qualitative' mortality rating (low, average or high) was not affected. In contrast, a sizeable minority of SMRs changed by ≥ 10 points if transfers were excluded or post-discharge deaths ignored. Model choice occasionally affected funnel plot outlier status.
CONCLUSIONS: Models for comparing hospitals' ACS mortality can be constructed with good discrimination using English administrative hospital data. Adjusting for transfers in and capturing post-discharge deaths are more important than the choice of comorbidity adjustment.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute coronary syndrome; Health services research; Hospital performance; Risk model; Statistics

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23063211     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  5 in total

1.  How many diagnosis fields are needed to capture safety events in administrative data? Findings and recommendations from the WHO ICD-11 Topic Advisory Group on Quality and Safety.

Authors:  Saskia E Drösler; Patrick S Romano; Vijaya Sundararajan; Bernard Burnand; Cyrille Colin; Harold Pincus; William Ghali
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  Preoperative risk factors in 10 418 patients with prior myocardial infarction and 5241 patients with prior unstable angina undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  A Bottle; A Mozid; H P Grocott; M R Walters; K R Lees; P Aylin; R D Sanders
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Acute myocardial infarction hospital admissions and deaths in England: a national follow-back and follow-forward record-linkage study.

Authors:  Perviz Asaria; Paul Elliott; Margaret Douglass; Ziad Obermeyer; Michael Soljak; Azeem Majeed; Majid Ezzati
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2017-03-01

4.  Multi-level models for heart failure patients' 30-day mortality and readmission rates: the relation between patient and hospital factors in administrative data.

Authors:  Afsaneh Roshanghalb; Cristina Mazzali; Emanuele Lettieri
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Cerebrovascular accident and acute coronary syndrome and perioperative outcomes (CAPO) study protocol: a 10-year database linkage between Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care, Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project and Office for National Statistics registries for time-dependent risk analysis of perioperative outcomes in English NHS hospitals.

Authors:  Matthew Stephen Luney; William Lindsay; Tricia M McKeever; Iain Keith Moppett
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.