Literature DB >> 23062658

Medium to long-term results of the UNIX uncemented unicompartmental knee replacement.

Matthew J Hall1, David A Connell, Hayden G Morris.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We report the first non-designer study of the Unix uncemented unicompartmental knee prosthesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-five consecutive UKRs were carried out with sixty-five available for follow-up. Oxford Knee Scores, WOMAC questionnaire and radiological assessment were completed.
RESULTS: The mean Oxford Knee Score was thirty-eight and WOMAC Score was twenty. Overall Kaplan Meier survival estimate is 76% (95% confidence interval 60%-97%) at 12years and 88% (95% confidence interval 76-100%) with aseptic loosening as the endpoint. Radiographic assessment showed lysis in the tibia in 6% of patients with no lysis evident around the central fin. DISCUSSION: Survivorship is comparable to other published series of UKRs. We suggest the central fin design is key to dissipating large forces throughout the proximal tibia, resulting in low levels of tibial loosening. Level of evidence IV.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiolucent lines; Tibial loosening; Unicompartmental knee replacement; Unix

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23062658     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  9 in total

1.  High rate of implant loosening for uncemented resurfacing-type medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Stefano Zaffagnini; Francesco Iacono; Laura Bragonzoni; Mirco Lo Presti; Maria Pia Neri; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Marco Nitri; Giovanni Raspugli; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Outcomes of cementless fixation in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: review of recent literature.

Authors:  M Basso; E Arnaldi; A A M Bruno; M Formica
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2020-06-26

Review 3.  Fixed- versus mobile-bearing UKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Geert Peersman; Bart Stuyts; Tom Vandenlangenbergh; Philippe Cartier; Peter Fennema
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  [Medial unicondylar knee replacement].

Authors:  O Lorbach; D Pape; P Mosser; D Kohn; K Anagnostakos
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Cementless fixation in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Campi; H G Pandit; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group.

Authors:  B Kerens; M G M Schotanus; B Boonen; P Boog; P J Emans; H Lacroix; N P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is effective: ten year results.

Authors:  Michele Vasso; Chiara Del Regno; Carlo Perisano; Antonio D'Amelio; Katia Corona; Alfredo Schiavone Panni
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Five-year experience of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  H G Pandit; S Campi; T W Hamilton; O D Dada; S Pollalis; C Jenkins; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Ten-Year Survivorship, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Satisfaction of a Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ryland Kagan; Mike B Anderson; Travis Bailey; Aaron A Hofmann; Christopher E Pelt
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-04-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.