Literature DB >> 23062420

Pathologic staging of pancreatic, ampullary, biliary, and gallbladder cancers: pitfalls and practical limitations of the current AJCC/UICC TNM staging system and opportunities for improvement.

N Volkan Adsay1, Pelin Bagci, Takuma Tajiri, Irma Oliva, Nobuyuki Ohike, Serdar Balci, Raul S Gonzalez, Olca Basturk, Kee-Taek Jang, Juan Carlos Roa.   

Abstract

Tumors of the ampulla-pancreatobiliary tract are encountered increasingly; however, their staging can be highly challenging due to lack of familiarity. In this review article, the various issues encountered in staging of these tumors at the pathologic level are evaluated and possible solutions for daily practice as well as potential improvements for future staging protocols are discussed. While N-stage parameters have now been well established (the number of lymph nodes required in pancreatoduodenectomies is 12), the T-staging has several issues: for the pancreas, the discovery of small cancers arising in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) necessitates the creation of substages of T1 (as T1a, b, and c); lack of proper definition of "peripancreatic soft tissue" and "common bile duct involvement" (as to which part is meant) makes T3 highly subjective. Increasing resectability of main vessels (portal vein) brings the need to redefine a "T" for such cases. For the ampulla, due to factors like anatomic complexity of the region and the under-appreciation of three-dimensional spread of the tumors in this area (in particular, the frequent extension into periduodenal soft tissues and duodenal serosa, which are not addressed in the current system and which require specific grossing approaches to document), the current T-staging lacks reproducibility and clinical relevance, and therefore, major revisions are needed. Recently proposed refined definition and site-specific subclassification of ampullary tumors highlight the areas for improvement. For the extrahepatic bile ducts, the staging schemes that use the depth of invasion may be more practical to circumvent the inconsistencies in the histologic layering of the ducts; better definition of terms like "periductal spread" is needed. For the gallbladder, since many gallbladder cancers are "unapparent" (found in clinically and grossly unsuspected cholecystectomies), establishing proper grossing protocols and adequate sampling are crucial. Since the gallbladder does not have the distinct layering of the other gastrointestinal organs, the definitions of Tis/T1a/T1b lack practicality, and therefore, "early gallbladder carcinoma" category proposed in high-risk regions may have to be recognized instead. Involvement of the Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses should be a part of the evaluation and management of these early gallbladder cancers; for advanced cancers, documentation of hepatic versus serosal involvement is necessary. In summary, T-staging of ampulla-pancreatobiliary tract tumors has many challenges. Proper grossing and appreciation of histo-anatomic subtleties of this region are crucial in addressing these issues and achieving more applicable and clinically relevant staging systems in the future.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23062420     DOI: 10.1053/j.semdp.2012.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol        ISSN: 0740-2570            Impact factor:   3.464


  50 in total

1.  Multi-institutional Validation Study of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th Edition) Changes for T and N Staging in Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Peter J Allen; Deborah Kuk; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Olca Basturk; Christopher L Wolfgang; John L Cameron; Keith D Lillemoe; Cristina R Ferrone; Vicente Morales-Oyarvide; Jin He; Matthew J Weiss; Ralph H Hruban; Mithat Gönen; David S Klimstra; Mari Mino-Kenudson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Gallbladder cancer: expert consensus statement.

Authors:  Thomas A Aloia; Nicolas Járufe; Milind Javle; Shishir K Maithel; Juan C Roa; Volkan Adsay; Felipe J F Coimbra; William R Jarnagin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Whipple made simple for surgical pathologists: orientation, dissection, and sampling of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens for a more practical and accurate evaluation of pancreatic, distal common bile duct, and ampullary tumors.

Authors:  N Volkan Adsay; Olca Basturk; Burcu Saka; Pelin Bagci; Denizhan Ozdemir; Serdar Balci; Juan M Sarmiento; David A Kooby; Charles Staley; Shishir K Maithel; Rhonda Everett; Jeanette D Cheng; Duangpeng Thirabanjasak; Donald W Weaver
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  A prospective, randomized trial of pancreatectomy combined with isolated hepatic perfusion via a dual route or conventional postoperative adjuvant therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic head carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaojun He; Yalin Kong; Dongqing Wen; Chengli Liu; Mei Xiao; Gang Zhao; Yuying Zhen; Hongyi Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

5.  Pathologic Evaluation and Reporting of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas and Other Tumoral Intraepithelial Neoplasms of Pancreatobiliary Tract: Recommendations of Verona Consensus Meeting.

Authors:  Volkan Adsay; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Toru Furukawa; Olca Basturk; Giuseppe Zamboni; Giovanni Marchegiani; Claudio Bassi; Roberto Salvia; Giuseppe Malleo; Salvatore Paiella; Christopher L Wolfgang; Hanno Matthaei; G Johan Offerhaus; Mustapha Adham; Marco J Bruno; Michelle D Reid; Alyssa Krasinskas; Günter Klöppel; Nobuyuki Ohike; Takuma Tajiri; Kee-Taek Jang; Juan Carlos Roa; Peter Allen; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo; Jin-Young Jang; David S Klimstra; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Can physician gestalt predict survival in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  Linda M Pak; Mithat Gonen; Kenneth Seier; Vinod P Balachandran; Michael I D'Angelica; William R Jarnagin; T Peter Kingham; Peter J Allen; Richard K G Do; Amber L Simpson
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-08

7.  Intrapancreatic distal common bile duct carcinoma: Analysis, staging considerations, and comparison with pancreatic ductal and ampullary adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Raul S Gonzalez; Pelin Bagci; Olca Basturk; Michelle D Reid; Serdar Balci; Jessica H Knight; So Yeon Kong; Bahar Memis; Kee-Taek Jang; Nobuyuki Ohike; Takuma Tajiri; Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Grace E Kim; Jeanette D Cheng; N Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 8.  Eighth Edition of the UICC Classification of Malignant Tumours: an overview of the changes in the pathological TNM classification criteria-What has changed and why?

Authors:  Luca Bertero; Federica Massa; Jasna Metovic; Roberto Zanetti; Isabella Castellano; Umberto Ricardi; Mauro Papotti; Paola Cassoni
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 9.  Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: current concepts and controversies.

Authors:  Michelle D Reid; Serdar Balci; Burcu Saka; N Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.943

10.  Determining the Adequate Examined Lymph Node Count in Resected Ampullary Adenocarcinoma-A National Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ibrahim Nassour; Alana Christie; Michael A Choti; John C Mansour; Rebecca M Minter; Patricio M Polanco; Mathew M Augustine; Matthew R Porembka; Xian-Jin Xie; Sam C Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.