| Literature DB >> 23062006 |
Diana Marek1, Stephanie Papin, Kim Ellefsen, Julien Niederhauser, Nathalie Isidor, Adriana Ransijn, Lucienne Poupon, Francois Spertini, Giuseppe Pantaleo, Sven Bergmann, Jacques S Beckmann, Sebastien Jacquemont, Goranka Tanackovic.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) is an inherited late-onset neurodegenerative disorder, characterized both by neurological and cognitive deficits. It is caused by the expansion of CGG repeats (55 to 200 repeats) in the noncoding region of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene. Abnormal immunological patterns are often associated with neurodegenerative disorders and implicated in their etiology. We therefore investigated the immune status of FXTAS patients, which had not been assessed prior to this study.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23062006 PMCID: PMC3528457 DOI: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-238
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroinflammation ISSN: 1742-2094 Impact factor: 8.322
Figure 1Effect of the FXTAS premutation status on the various phenotypes studied. (A) For each phenotype, the mean and standard deviation (SD) (or the percentage) were computed for the control and premutation groups. Various statistical tests were applied and their associated P values were computed according to the type and the distribution of the phenotypes in order to assess the effect of the clinical status. For normally distributed features (age and Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) score), a one-way analysis of variance was used. For the non-normally distributed phenotypes, such as diastolic and systolic blood pressure (DBP and SBP) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) concentrations, a Kruskal–Wallis test was applied using the ranks instead of the raw values. Finally, for binary phenotypes (percentage of smokers and of individuals under treatment), a generalized linear model was applied. (B) Boxplot representing the distribution (median and interquartile range) of the FXTAS scores for control and premutation groups.
Figure 2Correlations between and within the log-transformed cytokine measurements. Table shows the correlation structure between and within the log-transformed cytokine levels. The Pearson's correlations within a cytokine were computed using repeated measurements. For each of the three cytokines, the mean value was computed based on the repeated measurements and then the correlation between the averaged values was estimated (highlighted in grey). Numbers in brackets reflect the order of magnitude of the P values testing the hypothesis of no correlation against the alternative that there is a non-zero correlation.
Figure 3Effect of CGG repeat length on the mean cytokine concentrations. (A) Each log-transformed averaged cytokine basal concentration was regressed on the number of CGG repeats. Results of the linear modeling include the beta coefficient, the standard error (se), the Student’s t-test P value associated with the coefficient of the CGG variable and R2, the fraction of variance explained by the number of CGG repeats. The highlighted results describe the cytokine (mIL-10) for which the number of CGG repeats is significantly associated after multiple testing correction. (B) The regression plot represents the logarithm of the mean IL-10 basal concentration (in pg/ml) as the function of the CGG repeats. Each mean value (average of the two repeated measures) is represented by a diamond, and the error bar corresponds to the mean ± standard deviation. The regression line shows the fit of the data for which the equation of regression is also given.
Figure 4Effect of the CGG repeats number and age on the mean cytokine concentrations. Each log-transformed averaged cytokine basal concentration was regressed on the number of CGG repeats and the age variables. Results of the linear modeling include the beta coefficients, the standard errors (se), the Student’s t-test P values associated with the two coefficients (CGG repeats and age variables) and R2, the fraction of variance explained by the two variables. The highlighted results describe the cytokine (mIL-10) for which the number of CGG repeats is significantly associated after multiple testing correction.
Figure 5Group effect on the mean IL-10 concentrations. (A) Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the log-transformed averaged IL-10 concentrations for the control and premutation groups, as well as the P value associated with the one-way analysis of variance. (B) Boxplot representing the distribution (median and interquartile range) of the mean IL-10 concentrations for control and premutation groups.