Literature DB >> 23061583

Government intervention in health care markets is practical, necessary, and morally sound.

Len M Nichols1.   

Abstract

This essay makes the affirmative case for health reform by expounding on three fundamental points: (1) one moral case for expanding access to coverage and care to all is grounded in scriptural concepts of community and mutual obligation which continue to inform the American pursuit of justice; (2) the structure of PPACA springs from an appreciation of and approach to channeling market forces that was developed and proposed by a coalition of moderate and conservative Republican U.S. senators almost 20 years ago; (3) the most humane path to a better and more sustainable health system lies in implementing (and amending where appropriate) PPACA as fast and fully as we can. The purpose of this essay is to articulate why it is not possible to make our health system better, sustainable and serve us all without government playing specific and limited but absolutely crucial catalytic roles.
© 2012 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23061583     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00688.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  1 in total

1.  Introduction: The Health Care Reform Law (PPACA): controversies in ethics and policy.

Authors:  Robert M Sade
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.718

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.