BACKGROUND: A population-based database of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is invaluable to explore and monitor the epidemiology and outcome of the disease. In this context, an accurate and validated population-based case definition for IBD becomes critical for researchers and health care providers. METHODS: IBD and non-IBD individuals were identified through an endoscopy database in a western Canadian health region (Calgary Health Region, Calgary, Alberta). Subsequently, using a novel algorithm, a series of case definitions were developed to capture IBD cases in the administrative databases. In the second stage of the study, the criteria were validated in the Capital Health Region (Edmonton, Alberta). RESULTS: A total of 150 IBD case definitions were developed using 1399 IBD patients and 15,439 controls in the development phase. In the validation phase, 318,382 endoscopic procedures were searched and 5201 IBD patients were identified. After consideration of sensitivity, specificity and temporal stability of each validated case definition, a diagnosis of IBD was assigned to individuals who experienced at least two hospitalizations or had four physician claims, or two medical contacts in the Ambulatory Care Classification System database with an IBD diagnostic code within a two-year period (specificity 99.8%; sensitivity 83.4%; positive predictive value 97.4%; negative predictive value 98.5%). An alternative case definition was developed for regions without access to the Ambulatory Care Classification System database. A novel scoring system was developed that detected Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis patients with a specificity of >99% and a sensitivity of 99.1% and 86.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Through a robust methodology, a reproducible set of criteria to capture IBD patients through administrative databases was developed. The methodology may be used to develop similar administrative definitions for chronic diseases.
BACKGROUND: A population-based database of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is invaluable to explore and monitor the epidemiology and outcome of the disease. In this context, an accurate and validated population-based case definition for IBD becomes critical for researchers and health care providers. METHODS: IBD and non-IBD individuals were identified through an endoscopy database in a western Canadian health region (Calgary Health Region, Calgary, Alberta). Subsequently, using a novel algorithm, a series of case definitions were developed to capture IBD cases in the administrative databases. In the second stage of the study, the criteria were validated in the Capital Health Region (Edmonton, Alberta). RESULTS: A total of 150 IBD case definitions were developed using 1399 IBD patients and 15,439 controls in the development phase. In the validation phase, 318,382 endoscopic procedures were searched and 5201 IBD patients were identified. After consideration of sensitivity, specificity and temporal stability of each validated case definition, a diagnosis of IBD was assigned to individuals who experienced at least two hospitalizations or had four physician claims, or two medical contacts in the Ambulatory Care Classification System database with an IBD diagnostic code within a two-year period (specificity 99.8%; sensitivity 83.4%; positive predictive value 97.4%; negative predictive value 98.5%). An alternative case definition was developed for regions without access to the Ambulatory Care Classification System database. A novel scoring system was developed that detected Crohn disease and ulcerative colitispatients with a specificity of >99% and a sensitivity of 99.1% and 86.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Through a robust methodology, a reproducible set of criteria to capture IBD patients through administrative databases was developed. The methodology may be used to develop similar administrative definitions for chronic diseases.
Authors: S P Stowe; S R Redmond; J M Stormont; A N Shah; L N Chessin; H L Segal; W Y Chey Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1990-01 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Raina Shivashankar; William J Tremaine; W Scott Harmsen; Edward V Loftus Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Sarah L Reeves; Brian Madden; Meng Wu; Lauren S Miller; David Anders; Michele Caggana; Lindsay W Cogan; Mary Kleyn; Isabel Hurden; Gary L Freed; Kevin J Dombkowski Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Millie D Long; Susan Hutfless; Michael D Kappelman; Hamed Khalili; Gilaad G Kaplan; Charles N Bernstein; Jean Frederic Colombel; Corinne Gower-Rousseau; Lisa Herrinton; Fernando Velayos; Edward V Loftus; Geoffrey C Nguyen; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Amnon Sonnenberg; Andrew Chan; Robert S Sandler; Ashish Atreja; Samir A Shah; Kenneth J Rothman; Neal S Leleiko; Renee Bright; Paolo Boffetta; Kelly D Myers; Bruce E Sands Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: María E Negrón; Ali Rezaie; Herman W Barkema; Kevin Rioux; Jeroen De Buck; Sylvia Checkley; Paul L Beck; Matthew Carroll; Richard N Fedorak; Levinus Dieleman; Remo Panaccione; Subrata Ghosh; Gilaad G Kaplan Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Seoyoung C Kim; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Robert J Glynn; Michael Doherty; Allison B Goldfine; Daniel H Solomon Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2014-06-11 Impact factor: 19.103