Literature DB >> 23060997

Prostate-specific antigen nadir and time to prostate-specific antigen nadir following maximal androgen blockade independently predict prognosis in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

Seok Young Hong1, Dae Sung Cho, Sun Il Kim, Hyun Soo Ahn, Se Joong Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics following maximal androgen blockade (MAB) on disease progression and cancer-specific survival in patients with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-one patients with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with MAB at our institution were included in this study. Patients' characteristics, PSA at MAB initiation, PSA nadir, time to PSA nadir (TTN), and PSA decline were analyzed by using univariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 30 months, 97 patients (74.0%) showed disease progression and 65 patients (49.6%) died. Fifty-nine patients (45.0%) died from prostate cancer. In the univariate analysis, PSA at MAB initiation, PSA nadir, TTN, and PSA decline were significant predictors of progression-free survival. Also, PSA nadir, TTN, and PSA decline were significant predictors of cancer-specific survival. In the multivariate analysis, higher PSA nadir (≥0.2 ng/ml) and shorter TTN (<8 months) were independent predictors of shorter progression-free and cancer-specific survival. In the combined analysis of PSA nadir and TTN, patients with higher PSA nadir and shorter TTN had the worst progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 14.098; p<0.001) and cancer-specific survival (HR, 14.050; p<0.001) compared with those with lower PSA nadir and longer TTN.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that higher PSA nadir level and shorter TTN following MAB are associated with higher risk of disease progression and poorer survival in patients with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Furthermore, these two variables have a synergistic effect on the outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prognosis; Prostate-specific antigen; Prostatic neoplasms

Year:  2012        PMID: 23060997      PMCID: PMC3460002          DOI: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.9.607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Urol        ISSN: 2005-6737


INTRODUCTION

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer of men in the United States and the fifth most common cancer of men in Korea [1]. Recently, with the increase in use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a screening tool, the number of men presenting with metastatic disease has been decreasing [2]. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the mainstay of treatment for metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Although the majority of patients with metastatic disease initially respond well to ADT, almost all patients will eventually progress to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Treatment options for CRPC remain limited, and the prognosis of patients with CRPC is dismal [2]. Therefore, an accurate prediction of the response to ADT and individual survival would allow better prognostic evaluation and decision making for the best treatment strategy. The serum PSA level correlates with tumor volume and increases 6 to 12 months before definitive radiological or clinical proof of disease progression [3-5]. Accordingly, PSA kinetics has been used as a useful prognostic indicator of disease progression or survival in different clinical settings, including radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy [6-9]. However, its prognostic ability for patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated with ADT is still not well understood. The nadir PSA level has been suggested to be the most significant predictor of progression to CRPC in many studies [10-17]. However, there is controversy about the time to PSA nadir (TTN). Whereas earlier reports suggested that shorter TTN correlated with longer remission periods [3,4,18-21] or that TTN did not correlate with progression to CRPC [22], several recent reports suggested that longer TTN correlated with longer remission and survival [2,12,14-17,23-25]. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed our single-center treatment experience of patients with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer to evaluate the influence of PSA kinetics following maximal androgen blockade (MAB) on disease progression and cancer-specific survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 131 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer who started primary ADT with MAB (combination of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone [LHRH] agonists or bilateral orchiectomy and antiandrogen) at our institution between July 1996 and July 2010 were included in this study. Prostate cancer was diagnosed pathologically in all patients. In 4 patients with a pathologic diagnosis obtained through the biopsy of a metastatic site, the Gleason score could not be identified. LHRH agonist was used in 114 patients (87.0%) and bilateral orchiectomy was done in 17 patients (13.0%) as part of MAB. No patients had received any treatment such as prostatectomy or radiation therapy for the primary lesion. The patients' characteristics, PSA at MAB initiation, PSA nadir, TTN, and PSA decline were analyzed. The definitions used in this study followed those described by Huang et al. [17,24]. The PSA nadir was defined as the lowest PSA value achieved during ADT. TTN was defined as the duration of time from the initiation of ADT to the date of PSA nadir. PSA decline was calculated from the slope of the linear regression of the PSA values over time from the beginning of ADT to the nadir PSA. Progression was defined as a serial rise in PSA, at least two consecutive rises in PSA (>1 week apart) greater than the PSA nadir. The date of progression was defined as the date of the first PSA rise. Patients were dichotomized according to the median value of continuous variables except for the PSA nadir. Dichotomization according to a PSA nadir of 0.2 ng/ml was used because it was previously reported to correlate with prostate cancer-specific survival and disease progression in other studies [15,17,23-27]. To evaluate the interactive effect of PSA nadir and TTN on disease progression and survival, patients were stratified into four groups: 1) PSA nadir <0.2 ng/ml and TTN ≥8 months, 2) PSA nadir <0.2 ng/ml and TTN <8 months, 3) PSA nadir ≥0.2 ng/ml and TTN ≥8 months, and 4) PSA nadir ≥0.2 ng/ml and TTN <8 months. Progression-free and cancer-specific survival curves were obtained by the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by using the log-rank test and the Cox's proportional hazards regression model, respectively. All statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS ver. 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Values of p<0.05 were considered to be statistically significant in all of the analyses.

RESULTS

The clinicopathological characteristics of the 131 patients included in the study are summarized in Table 1. At MAB initiation, the median age of the patients was 72 years and their median PSA level was 151 ng/ml. During MAB, the median PSA nadir was 0.5 ng/ml and 53 patients (40.5%) achieved a PSA nadir <0.2 ng/ml. The median TTN was 8 months and the median PSA decline was 242 ng/ml/yr. The median follow-up period was 30 months (range, 7 to 133 months). Of the total 131 patients, 97 patients (74.0%) showed disease progression and 65 patients (49.6%) died during the follow-up. Among them, 59 patients (45.0%) died from prostate cancer.
TABLE 1

Characteristics of the 131 patients who underwent MAB

Values are presented as median (range) or number (%).

MAB, maximal androgen blockade; LHRH, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone; PSA, prostate-specific antigen.

The mean progression-free survival in patients with PSA<151 ng/ml at MAB initiation was significantly longer than that in patients with PSA≥151 ng/ml at MAB initiation (34.4 months vs. 17.9 months, p=0.005) (Fig. 1A), but there was no significant difference in cancer-specific survival between the two groups (p=0.236) (Fig. 2A). The mean progression-free and cancer-specific survival in patients with PSA nadir<0.2 ng/ml were significantly longer than those in patients with PSA nadir≥0.2 ng/ml (46.5 months vs. 13.0 months, p<0.001; 91.7 months vs. 49.8 months, p<0.001) (Figs. 1B, 2B). The mean progression-free and cancer-specific survival in patients with TTN ≥8 months were significantly longer than those in patients with TTN<8 months (35.1 months vs. 13.9 months, p<0.001; 88.4 months vs. 42.7 months, p<0.001) (Figs. 1C, 2C). The mean progression-free and cancer-specific survival in patients with PSA decline <242 ng/ml/yr were significantly longer than those in patients with PSA decline ≥242 ng/ml/yr (31.8 months vs. 16.3 months, p<0.001; 79.2 months vs. 50.0 months, p<0.001) (Figs. 1D, 2D).
FIG. 1

Kaplan-Meier progression-free survival curves according to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at maximal androgen blockade (MAB) initiation (A), PSA nadir (B), time to PSA nadir (TTN) (C), and PSA decline (D).

FIG. 2

Kaplan-Meier cancer-specific survival curves according to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at maximal androgen blockade (MAB) initiation (A), PSA nadir (B), time to PSA nadir (TTN) (C), and PSA decline (D).

In the univariate analysis, PSA at MAB initiation, PSA nadir, TTN, and PSA decline were significant predictors of progression-free survival. Also, PSA nadir, TTN, and PSA decline were significant predictors of cancer-specific survival (Table 2). In the multivariate analysis, higher PSA nadir (≥0.2 ng/ml) and shorter TTN (<8 months) were independent predictors of shorter progression-free and cancer-specific survival (Table 3). In the combined analysis of PSA nadir and TTN, patients with higher PSA nadir and shorter TTN had the worst progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 14.098; p<0.001) and cancer-specific survival (HR, 14.050; p<0.001) compared to those with lower PSA nadir and longer TTN (Table 3, Fig. 3).
TABLE 2

Univariate analysis of potential prognostic factors for progression-free and cancer-specific survival

MAB, maximal androgen blockade; PSA, prostate-specific antigen.

TABLE 3

Multivariate analysis of potential adverse prognostic factors for progression-free and cancer-specific survival

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; MAB, maximal androgen blockade; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; TTN, time to PSA nadir.

a:Combined analysis of PSA nadir/TTN.

FIG. 3

Kaplan-Meier progression-free (A) and cancer-specific (B) survival curves according to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir and time to PSA nadir (TTN). MAB, maximal androgen blockade.

DISCUSSION

It is generally accepted that serum PSA parameters, such as pretreatment PSA level, PSA nadir level after treatment, TTN, and the pattern of PSA decline after treatment, are useful indicators for evaluating the response to ADT in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. However, the prognostic significance of these PSA parameters is still controversial. Whereas the pretreatment PSA level has been suggested to predict the response to ADT in some reports [4,13,15,28], it did not predict the interval to progression to CRPC in other studies [11,16,29]. In our study, the pretreatment PSA level was a significant predictor of progression-free survival in the univariate analysis, but it lost statistical significance in the multivariate analysis. Nadir PSA level after ADT has been suggested to be the most significant predictor of progression to CRPC [10-17] and survival [23-25] in many studies. Our study also demonstrated that lower PSA nadir after MAB is an independent predictor of longer progression-free and cancer-specific survival. However, there is no consensus on the optimal threshold of PSA nadir after ADT for predicting disease progression and survival. Kwak et al. [13] reported that a lower limit for the nadir PSA level of 1.1 ng/ml gives optimal sensitivity and specificity for predicting the progression to CRPC. Park et al. [22], Morote et al. [14], and Miller et al. [11] suggested that nadir PSA levels of 0.5, 2, and 4 ng/ml were the optimal thresholds for predicting the progression to CRPC, respectively. Hussain et al. [26] reported that a PSA of <4 ng/ml after 7 months of ADT was a strong predictor of survival. However, in many other studies, the nadir PSA level of 0.2 ng/ml was suggested to be the optimal threshold for predicting the progression to CRPC [15,17] and survival [23-25,27]. Morote et al. [15] reported that the nadir PSA level of 0.2 ng/ml was the optimal threshold for predicting the progression to CRPC and that the failure to achieve a nadir PSA level of 0.2 ng/ml was associated with a 20 times likelihood of progression to CRPC within 24 months. Stewart et al. [27] suggested that a PSA nadir of >0.2 ng/ml after 8 months of ADT was significantly associated with prostate cancer-specific mortality in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. Therefore, the nadir PSA level of 0.2 ng/ml was chosen as the threshold in our study and the results showed that higher PSA nadir (≥0.2 ng/ml) after MAB was an independent predictor of shorter progression-free and cancer-specific survival. The prognostic significance of TTN after ADT on disease progression and survival is also controversial. Earlier reports suggested that shorter TTN correlated with longer remission periods [3,4,18-21]. Stamey et al. [18] reported that patients whose PSA decreased rapidly to an undetectable level after ADT had prolonged survival and showed that the PSA level at 6 months after ADT was capable of distinguishing patients with a favorable response from those with a limited response to ADT. Cooper et al. [4] also reported that the PSA nadir reached within 6 months after ADT was a predictor of survival in a univariate analysis. Arai et al. [3] showed that patients whose PSA decreased rapidly to an undetectable level within 1 month after ADT had the best prognosis and that patients whose PSA level remained elevated for more than 3 months had a risk of disease progression within 2 years. Petros and Andriole [20] and Furuya et al. [21] also demonstrated that normalization of PSA at 3 months after ADT was associated with a more favorable prognosis. However, Park et al. [22] reported that TTN after MAB did not correlate with progression to CRPC. On the contrary, several recent reports have suggested that a longer TTN is correlated with longer remission and survival [2,12,14-17,23-25]. Morote et al. [15] suggested that patients with a longer TTN (>12 months) after ADT had an 18 times higher likelihood of being free of progression to CRPC within 24 months than did those with shorter TTN (≤12 months). Huang et al. [17] also reported that patients with a shorter TTN (<10 months) after ADT had a significantly shorter time to disease progression. Choueiri et al. [23], Huang et al. [24], and Sasaki et al. [25] suggested that longer TTN (≥6 months, ≥10 months, >9 months, respectively) after ADT correlated with longer survival duration. Moreover, Huang et al. [17,24] reported that the patients with higher PSA nadir (≥0.2 ng/ml) and shorter TTN (<10 months) had a significantly higher risk of disease progression, cancer-specific mortality, and all-cause mortality than did those with lower PSA nadir (<0.2 ng/ml) and longer TTN (≥10 months) (HR, 3.11, 6.30, 4.79, respectively, all p<0.001). Sasaki et al. [25] also suggested that the combination of lower PSA nadir (<0.2 ng/ml) and longer TTN (>9 months) after ADT was the most important early predictor of longer survival. The results of our study also support these recent findings. Shorter TTN (<8 months) after ADT was an independent predictor of shorter progression-free and cancer-specific survival in the multivariate analysis. Moreover, in the combined analysis of PSA nadir and TTN, patients with a higher PSA nadir (≥0.2 ng/ml) and shorter TTN (<8 months) had the worst progression-free and cancer-specific survival compared with those with lower PSA nadir (<0.2 ng/ml) and longer TTN (≥8 months) (HR, 14.098, 14.050, respectively, all p<0.001). The mechanisms responsible for the association of shorter TTN with worse prognosis are not clear. The rapid decrease in the PSA level may be related to a transcriptional effect of ADT on PSA production rather than prostate cancer cell death [23,25]. The rapid decrease in the PSA level after ADT may be due to ablation of androgen receptor function, and the quick suppression of androgen/androgen receptor during ADT may have a negative effect on disease progression, because androgen receptor can act as a tumor suppressor for prostate cancer [17]. Another possibility is that a rapid removal of hormone-sensitive prostate cancer cells may induce an adequate environment for the growth of hormone-resistant prostate cancer cells [25]. But, further studies will be needed to verify these hypotheses. Whereas biopsy Gleason score was not a predictor of progression to CRPC [13] or overall survival [25] in patients treated with ADT in some reports, it was an independent predictor of progression to CRPC [12,14,16,17,22,28] or survival [23,24,26] in many other studies. In our study, biopsy Gleason score showed only marginal significance as a predictor of progression-free and cancer-specific survival in a univariate analysis (p=0.060, p=0.064, respectively). Whereas other studies included patients without metastasis [16,17,22,24,28] or applied ADT as a primary treatment in only 56 to 56.9% of patients [16,17,24], all of our patients had metastasis at diagnosis and received ADT as the primary treatment. Moreover, among the studies with the same homogeneity of patients' characteristics as ours, the proportion of patients with Gleason score >7 in our study (68.7%) was much higher than that in other studies (46.9 to 58.9%) [14,23,26]. This might explain the lack of significance of Gleason score as a prognostic factor in our study. This study had several limitations. First, this study was conducted in a single center. Second, it was retrospective in nature and the size of the study population was small. Third, some important factors, such as performance status and lactate dehydrogenase were not included in this study, because these data were not available in all patients. Nevertheless, we believe that the results of our study support the already reported role of PSA nadir and TTN following ADT as independent predictors of disease progression and survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated that higher PSA nadir level and shorter TTN following MAB are associated with higher risk of disease progression and poorer survival in patients with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Furthermore, these two variables have a synergistic effect on the outcome. These results may be helpful in predicting the prognosis after MAB and in guiding decision making concerning the best treatment strategy in patients with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
  25 in total

1.  Nadir PSA level and time to PSA nadir following primary androgen deprivation therapy are the early survival predictors for prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis.

Authors:  T Sasaki; T Onishi; A Hoshina
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 5.554

2.  Outcomes and predictive factors for biochemical relapse following primary androgen deprivation therapy in men with bone scan negative prostate cancer.

Authors:  S Hori; T Jabbar; N Kachroo; J C Vasconcelos; C N Robson; V J Gnanapragasam
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Predictors of prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy.

Authors:  Ping Zhou; Ming-Hui Chen; David McLeod; Peter R Carroll; Judd W Moul; Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Prostatic specific antigen and the prediction of prognosis in metastatic prostatic cancer.

Authors:  E H Cooper; T G Armitage; M R Robinson; D W Newling; B R Richards; P H Smith; L Denis; R Sylvester
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Absolute prostate-specific antigen value after androgen deprivation is a strong independent predictor of survival in new metastatic prostate cancer: data from Southwest Oncology Group Trial 9346 (INT-0162).

Authors:  Maha Hussain; Catherine M Tangen; Celestia Higano; Paul F Schelhammer; James Faulkner; E David Crawford; George Wilding; Atif Akdas; Eric J Small; Bryan Donnelly; Gary MacVicar; Derek Raghavan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Efficacy of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with advanced prostate cancer: association between Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen level, and prior ADT exposure with duration of ADT effect.

Authors:  Robert W Ross; Wanling Xie; Meredith M Regan; Mark Pomerantz; Mari Nakabayashi; Timothy J Daskivich; Oliver Sartor; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Philip W Kantoff; William K Oh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  The clinical usefulness of serum prostate specific antigen after hormonal therapy of metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  J I Miller; F R Ahmann; G W Drach; S S Emerson; M R Bottaccini
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prostate specific antigen half-time and prostate specific antigen doubling time as predictors of response to androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yong Hyun Park; In Sik Hwang; Chang Wook Jeong; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Sang Eun Lee; Cheol Kwak
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Nadir prostate-specific antigen best predicts the progression to androgen-independent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Juan Morote; Enrique Trilla; Salvador Esquena; José María Abascal; Jaume Reventos
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Time to prostate-specific antigen nadir independently predicts overall survival in patients who have metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with androgen-deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Toni K Choueiri; Wanling Xie; Anthony V D'Amico; Robert W Ross; Jim C Hu; Mark Pomerantz; Meredith M Regan; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Philip W Kantoff; Oliver Sartor; William K Oh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  10 in total

1.  Time to prostate specific antigen (PSA) nadir may predict rapid relapse in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) receiving docetaxel chemotherapy.

Authors:  Betsan M Thomas; Christian Smith; Jessica Evans; Michael R Button; Satish Kumar; Nachi Palaniappan; John Staffurth; Jacob S Tanguay; Jason F Lester
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Predictors of survival in prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis and extremely high prostate-specific antigen levels.

Authors:  Kyo Chul Koo; Sang Un Park; Ki Hong Kim; Koon Ho Rha; Sung Joon Hong; Seung Choul Yang; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2015-02-12

3.  Predictors of survival outcomes in native sub Saharan black men newly diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jibril Oyekunle Bello
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  Changes in prostate-specific antigen kinetics during androgen-deprivation therapy as a predictor of response to abiraterone in chemonaïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chung-Lin Lee; Ying-Hsu Chang; Chung-Yi Liu; Ming-Li Hsieh; Liang-Kang Huang; Yuan-Cheng Chu; Hung-Cheng Kan; Po-Hung Lin; Kai-Jie Yu; Cheng-Keng Chuang; Chun-Te Wu; See-Tong Pang; I-Hung Shao
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2022-09

5.  The slope associated with nadir prostate-specific antigen is prognostically significant in men with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer after primary androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Zeng Zhenhao; Cheng Xiaofeng; Jiang Hao; Yi Ming; Zhang Hongtao; He Wenrui; Zhang Cheng; Zhou Xiaochen; Wang Gongxian
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.711

6.  Prognostic Impacts of Metastatic Site and Pain on Progression to Castrate Resistance and Mortality in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Kyo Chul Koo; Sang Un Park; Ki Hong Kim; Koon Ho Rha; Sung Joon Hong; Seung Choul Yang; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Hospitalization decreases serum prostate-specific antigen values compared with outpatient values in patients with benign prostatic diseases.

Authors:  In Seok Yoon; Tae Young Shin; Sun Il Kim; Seong Kon Park; Hyun Ik Jang; Jong Bo Choi; Hyun Soo Ahn; Young Soo Kim; Se Joong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-09-10

8.  PSA time to nadir as a prognostic factor of first-line docetaxel treatment in castration-resistant prostate cancer: evidence from patients in Northwestern China.

Authors:  Kai-Jie Wu; Xin-Qi Pei; Ge Tian; Da-Peng Wu; Jin-Hai Fan; Yu-Mei Jiang; Da-Lin He
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Prostate specific antigen (PSA) kinetic as a prognostic factor in metastatic prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andika Afriansyah; Agus Rizal Ardy Hariandy Hamid; Chaidir Arif Mochtar; Rainy Umbas
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-02-28

10.  Prostate cryoablation combined with androgen deprivation therapy for newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer: a propensity score-based study.

Authors:  Ning Wang; Yangtian Ye; Minhua Deng; Diwei Zhao; Lijuan Jiang; Dong Chen; Zhiming Wu; Yanjun Wang; ZhiYong Li; Zhenyu Yang; Jibin Li; Fangjian Zhou; Yonghong Li
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 5.554

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.