Literature DB >> 23060760

Patterns of brain activity distinguishing free and forced actions: contribution from sensory cortices.

Wojciech Kostelecki1, Ye Mei, Luis Garcia Dominguez, José L Pérez Velázquez.   

Abstract

The neural basis of decision-making is extremely complex due to the large number of factors that contribute to the outcome of even the most basic actions as well as the range of appropriate responses within many behavioral contexts. To better understand the neural processes underlying basic forms of decision-making, this study utilized an experiment that required a choice about whether to press a button with the right or left hand. These instances of decision-making were compared to identical button presses that were experimentally specified rather than selected by the subject. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to record neural activity during these-what are being termed-free and forced actions and differences in the MEG signal between these two conditions were attributed to the distinct forms of neural activity required to carry out the two types of actions. To produce instances of free and forced behavior, cued button-pressing experiments were performed that use visual, aural, and memorized cues to instruct experimental subjects of the expected outcome of individual trials. Classification analysis of the trials revealed that cortical regions that allowed for the most accurate classification of free and forced actions primarily handle sensory input for the modality used to cue the trials: occipital cortex for visually cued trials, temporal cortex for aurally cued trials, and minor non-localized differences in MEG activity for trials initiated from memory. The differential roles of visual and auditory sensory cortices during free and forced actions provided insight into the neural processing steps that were engaged to initiate cued actions. Specifically, it suggested that detectable differences exist in the activity of sensory cortices and their target sites when subjects performed free and forced actions in response to sensory cues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision-making; free will; granger causality; magnetoencephalography (MEG); single trial classification

Year:  2012        PMID: 23060760      PMCID: PMC3459011          DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-5145


  14 in total

Review 1.  Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting.

Authors:  J D Schall
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements. II. The effect of movement predictability on regional cerebral blood flow.

Authors:  I H Jenkins; M Jahanshahi; M Jueptner; R E Passingham; D J Brooks
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Interference with performance of a response selection task that has no working memory component: an rTMS comparison of the dorsolateral prefrontal and medial frontal cortex.

Authors:  K A Hadland; M F Rushworth; R E Passingham; M Jahanshahi; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Cortical areas and the selection of movement: a study with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  M P Deiber; R E Passingham; J G Colebatch; K J Friston; P D Nixon; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Anterior prefrontal function and the limits of human decision-making.

Authors:  Etienne Koechlin; Alexandre Hyafil
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The role of the preSMA and the rostral cingulate zone in internally selected actions.

Authors:  Veronika A Mueller; Marcel Brass; Florian Waszak; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain.

Authors:  Chun Siong Soon; Marcel Brass; Hans-Jochen Heinze; John-Dylan Haynes
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-13       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Cerebral structures participating in motor preparation in humans: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  M P Deiber; V Ibañez; N Sadato; M Hallett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Single trial classification of magnetoencephalographic recordings using Granger causality.

Authors:  Wojciech Kostelecki; Luis Garcia Dominguez; José Luis Pérez Velázquez
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Mesial motor areas in self-initiated versus externally triggered movements examined with fMRI: effect of movement type and rate.

Authors:  M P Deiber; M Honda; V Ibañez; N Sadato; M Hallett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  2 in total

1.  Proactive Recruitment of Frontoparietal and Salience Networks for Voluntary Decisions.

Authors:  Natalie Rens; Stefan Bode; Hana Burianová; Ross Cunnington
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  A model of functional brain connectivity and background noise as a biomarker for cognitive phenotypes: application to autism.

Authors:  Luis García Domínguez; José Luis Pérez Velázquez; Roberto Fernández Galán
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.