Literature DB >> 23060680

Effects of preference and reinforcer variation on within-session patterns of responding.

Alice A Keyl-Austin1, Andrew L Samaha, Sarah E Bloom, Megan A Boyle.   

Abstract

We examined correspondence between preference assessment outcome and within-session patterns of responding in one subject with autism. Responding maintained by a single highly preferred item resulted in a greater total number of responses, a slower decline in within-session response rates, and a greater proportion of short interresponse times compared to responding maintained by varied moderately preferred (MP) stimuli. Presenting varied MP stimuli within the same session produced greater levels and more sustained responding than presenting those same stimuli individually.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autism; behavioral economics; bridge study; marginal utility; preference assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23060680      PMCID: PMC3469308          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  11 in total

1.  Assessing reinforcers under progressive schedule requirements.

Authors:  H S Roane; D C Lerman; C M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: theoretical, methodological, and practical implications for applied research.

Authors:  Eric S Murphy; Frances K McSweeney; Richard G Smith; Jennifer J McComas
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

3.  Motivational influences on performance maintained by food reinforcement.

Authors:  Stephen T North; Brian A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

4.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

5.  Preference for reinforcers under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of single and concurrent arrangements.

Authors:  Ashley C Glover; Henry S Roane; Heather J Kadey; Laura L Grow
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

6.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

7.  Relative versus absolute reinforcement effects: implications for preference assessments.

Authors:  E M Roscoe; B A Iwata; S Kahng
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

8.  Reinforcer variation: implications for motivating developmentally disabled children.

Authors:  A L Egel
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1981

9.  The effects of constant vs varied reinforcer presentation on responding by autistic children.

Authors:  A L Egel
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1980-12

10.  Effects of stimulus variation on the reinforcing capability of nonpreferred stimuli.

Authors:  Leah J Koehler; Brian A Iwata; Eileen M Roscoe; Natalie U Rolider; Laura E O'Steen
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.