Literature DB >> 23060611

Network-based inference from complex proteomic mixtures using SNIPE.

David P Nusinow1, Adam Kiezun, Daniel J O'Connell, Joel M Chick, Yingzi Yue, Richard L Maas, Steven P Gygi, Shamil R Sunyaev.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Proteomics presents the opportunity to provide novel insights about the global biochemical state of a tissue. However, a significant problem with current methods is that shotgun proteomics has limited success at detecting many low abundance proteins, such as transcription factors from complex mixtures of cells and tissues. The ability to assay for these proteins in the context of the entire proteome would be useful in many areas of experimental biology.
RESULTS: We used network-based inference in an approach named SNIPE (Software for Network Inference of Proteomics Experiments) that selectively highlights proteins that are more likely to be active but are otherwise undetectable in a shotgun proteomic sample. SNIPE integrates spectral counts from paired case-control samples over a network neighbourhood and assesses the statistical likelihood of enrichment by a permutation test. As an initial application, SNIPE was able to select several proteins required for early murine tooth development. Multiple lines of additional experimental evidence confirm that SNIPE can uncover previously unreported transcription factors in this system. We conclude that SNIPE can enhance the utility of shotgun proteomics data to facilitate the study of poorly detected proteins in complex mixtures.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An implementation for the R statistical computing environment named snipeR has been made freely available at http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/snipe/. CONTACT: ssunyaev@rics.bwh.harvard.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23060611      PMCID: PMC3509492          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  24 in total

1.  Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS.

Authors:  Scott A Gerber; John Rush; Olaf Stemman; Marc W Kirschner; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review.

Authors:  Marcus Bantscheff; Markus Schirle; Gavain Sweetman; Jens Rick; Bernhard Kuster
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 4.142

3.  Advances in proteomic workflows for systems biology.

Authors:  Johan Malmström; Hookeun Lee; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 9.740

4.  Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast.

Authors:  Lyris M F de Godoy; Jesper V Olsen; Jürgen Cox; Michael L Nielsen; Nina C Hubner; Florian Fröhlich; Tobias C Walther; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-09-28       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  lumi: a pipeline for processing Illumina microarray.

Authors:  Pan Du; Warren A Kibbe; Simon M Lin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 6.  Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses.

Authors:  Christine Vogel; Edward M Marcotte
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Correlation between protein and mRNA abundance in yeast.

Authors:  S P Gygi; Y Rochon; B R Franza; R Aebersold
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Systematic survey reveals general applicability of "guilt-by-association" within gene coexpression networks.

Authors:  Cecily J Wolfe; Isaac S Kohane; Atul J Butte
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Chemogenomic profiling on a genome-wide scale using reverse-engineered gene networks.

Authors:  Diego di Bernardo; Michael J Thompson; Timothy S Gardner; Sarah E Chobot; Erin L Eastwood; Andrew P Wojtovich; Sean J Elliott; Scott E Schaus; James J Collins
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): mouse biology and model systems.

Authors:  Carol J Bult; Janan T Eppig; James A Kadin; Joel E Richardson; Judith A Blake
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  4 in total

1.  Candidate prioritization for low-abundant differentially expressed proteins in 2D-DIGE datasets.

Authors:  Umesh K Nandal; Wytze J Vlietstra; Carsten Byrman; Rienk E Jeeninga; Jeffrey H Ringrose; Antoine H C van Kampen; Dave Speijer; Perry D Moerland
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Combined analysis of gene regulatory network and SNV information enhances identification of potential gene markers in mouse knockout studies with small number of samples.

Authors:  Benjamin Hur; Heejoon Chae; Sun Kim
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 3.  Integrating genomic, transcriptomic, and interactome data to improve Peptide and protein identification in shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Xiaojing Wang; Bing Zhang
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  A hybrid computational method for the discovery of novel reproduction-related genes.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Chen Chu; Xiangyin Kong; Guohua Huang; Tao Huang; Yu-Dong Cai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.