Literature DB >> 23060487

First European interlaboratory comparison of tetracycline and age determination with red fox teeth following oral rabies vaccination programs.

Emmanuelle Robardet1, Jean-Michel Demerson, Sabrina Andrieu, Florence Cliquet.   

Abstract

The first European interlaboratory comparison of tetracycline and age determination with red fox (Vulpes vulpes) tooth samples was organized by the European Union Reference Laboratory for rabies. Performance and procedures implemented by member states were compared. These techniques are widely used to monitor bait uptake in European oral rabies vaccination campaigns. A panel of five red fox half-mandibles comprising one weak positive juvenile sample, two positive adult samples, one negative juvenile sample, and one negative adult sample were sent, along with a technical questionnaire, to 12 laboratories participating on a voluntary basis. The results of only three laboratories (25%) were 100% correct. False-negative results were more frequently seen in weak positive juvenile samples (58%) but were infrequent in positive adult samples (4%), probably due to differences in the ease of reading the two groups of teeth. Four laboratories (44%) had correct results for age determination on all samples. Ages were incorrectly identified in both adult and juvenile samples, with 11 and 17% of discordant results, respectively. Analysis of the technical questionnaires in parallel with test results suggested that all laboratories cutting mandible sections between the canine and first premolar obtained false results. All the laboratories using longitudinal rather than transverse sections and those not using a mounting medium also produced false results. Section thickness appeared to affect the results; no mistakes were found in laboratories using sections <150 μm thick. Factors having a potential impact on the success of laboratories were discussed, and recommendations proposed. Such interlaboratory trials underline the importance of using standardized procedures for biomarker detection in oral rabies vaccination campaigns. Several changes can be made to improve analysis quality and increase the comparability of bait uptake frequencies among member states.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23060487     DOI: 10.7589/2011-07-205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wildl Dis        ISSN: 0090-3558            Impact factor:   1.535


  10 in total

1.  Epidemiology and molecular diversity of rabies viruses in Bulgaria.

Authors:  E Robardet; D Ilieva; E Iliev; E Gagnev; E Picard-Meyer; F Cliquet
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.434

Review 2.  Oral vaccination of wildlife using a vaccinia-rabies-glycoprotein recombinant virus vaccine (RABORAL V-RG®): a global review.

Authors:  Joanne Maki; Anne-Laure Guiot; Michel Aubert; Bernard Brochier; Florence Cliquet; Cathleen A Hanlon; Roni King; Ernest H Oertli; Charles E Rupprecht; Caroline Schumacher; Dennis Slate; Boris Yakobson; Anne Wohlers; Emily W Lankau
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.683

3.  Control and elimination of rabies in Croatia.

Authors:  Tomislav Bedeković; Ivana Lohman Janković; Ivana Šimić; Nina Krešić; Ivana Lojkić; Ivica Sučec; Emmanuelle Robardet; Florence Cliquet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Zero Endemic Cases of Wildlife Rabies (Classical Rabies Virus, RABV) in the European Union by 2020: An Achievable Goal.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Robardet; Dean Bosnjak; Lena Englund; Panayiotis Demetriou; Pedro Rosado Martín; Florence Cliquet
Journal:  Trop Med Infect Dis       Date:  2019-09-30

5.  Antibody response to Raboral VR-G® oral rabies vaccine in captive and free-ranging black-backed jackals (Canis mesomelas).

Authors:  Katja N Koeppel; Peter Geertsma; Brian F Kuhn; Ockert L Van Schalkwyk; Peter N Thompson
Journal:  Onderstepoort J Vet Res       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 1.792

6.  Antigenic and genetic characterization of a divergent African virus, Ikoma lyssavirus.

Authors:  Daniel L Horton; Ashley C Banyard; Denise A Marston; Emma Wise; David Selden; Alejandro Nunez; Daniel Hicks; Tiziana Lembo; Sarah Cleaveland; Alison J Peel; Ivan V Kuzmin; Charles E Rupprecht; Anthony R Fooks
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.891

Review 7.  Rabies in the Baltic States: Decoding a Process of Control and Elimination.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Robardet; Evelyne Picard-Meyer; Marianna Dobroštana; Ingrida Jaceviciene; Katrin Mähar; Zita Muižniece; Gediminas Pridotkas; Marius Masiulis; Enel Niin; Edvīns Olševskis; Florence Cliquet
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-02-05

8.  Safety, efficacy and immunogenicity evaluation of the SAG2 oral rabies vaccine in Formosan ferret badgers.

Authors:  Ai-Ping Hsu; Chun-Hsien Tseng; Jacques Barrat; Shu-Hwae Lee; Yu-Hua Shih; Marine Wasniewski; Philippe Mähl; Chia-Chia Chang; Chun-Ta Lin; Re-Shang Chen; Wen-Jane Tu; Florence Cliquet; Hsiang-Jung Tsai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Methods for the identification of farm escapees in feral mink (Neovison vison) populations.

Authors:  Sussie Pagh; Cino Pertoldi; Heidi Huus Petersen; Trine Hammer Jensen; Mette Sif Hansen; Sussi Madsen; David Chr Evar Kraft; Niels Iversen; Peter Roslev; Mariann Chriel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Efficient distribution of oral vaccines examined by infrared triggered camera for advancing the control of raccoon dog rabies in South Korea.

Authors:  Hyun-Kyu Cho; Yoon-Joo Shin; Nam-Shik Shin; Joon-Seok Chae
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 1.267

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.