BACKGROUND: Visual symptoms in older people can be complex and inadequately explained by eye pathology alone. Psychological and neurodegenerative processes may manifest as complex visual symptoms, and thus some patients may be poorly served by a purely ophthalmic approach. We have developed a novel multidisciplinary clinic with input from neurology, ophthalmology, and psychiatric specialists. Here, we describe the patient population, disease prevalence, and potential impact of this new clinic. METHODS: A retrospective audit of paper and electronic records from June 2010 to February 2012 and selected case reports. RESULTS: Between June 2010 and February 2012 48 patients attended the clinic. Notes were available for 47 (98%). Mean age was 76.2 (range 48-92). The main presenting complaints were hallucinations, followed by nonspecific visual deficit, double vision, blurred vision, and visuospatial deficit. Cognitive impairment was noted in 68% (32/47) of patients, of which 16/32 (50%) were new diagnoses. We were able to give a diagnosis to 98% (46/47) of patients; of these, 74% (35/46) were new diagnoses. A total of 6% (3/47) were felt to have presentations attributable to eye pathology alone, whereas 89% (42/47) were felt to have a neuropsychiatric component. Management included referral to other clinics for continuing care in 43% (20/47) and initiation of therapy in 36% (17/47). The three case reports demonstrate cases, where our multidisciplinary approach aided diagnosis and management of patients with complex visual symptoms. CONCLUSION: A combined clinic with neurological, ophthalmic, and psychiatric input is an effective way to diagnose and manage complex visual problems in older people.
BACKGROUND:Visual symptoms in older people can be complex and inadequately explained by eye pathology alone. Psychological and neurodegenerative processes may manifest as complex visual symptoms, and thus some patients may be poorly served by a purely ophthalmic approach. We have developed a novel multidisciplinary clinic with input from neurology, ophthalmology, and psychiatric specialists. Here, we describe the patient population, disease prevalence, and potential impact of this new clinic. METHODS: A retrospective audit of paper and electronic records from June 2010 to February 2012 and selected case reports. RESULTS: Between June 2010 and February 2012 48 patients attended the clinic. Notes were available for 47 (98%). Mean age was 76.2 (range 48-92). The main presenting complaints were hallucinations, followed by nonspecific visual deficit, double vision, blurred vision, and visuospatial deficit. Cognitive impairment was noted in 68% (32/47) of patients, of which 16/32 (50%) were new diagnoses. We were able to give a diagnosis to 98% (46/47) of patients; of these, 74% (35/46) were new diagnoses. A total of 6% (3/47) were felt to have presentations attributable to eye pathology alone, whereas 89% (42/47) were felt to have a neuropsychiatric component. Management included referral to other clinics for continuing care in 43% (20/47) and initiation of therapy in 36% (17/47). The three case reports demonstrate cases, where our multidisciplinary approach aided diagnosis and management of patients with complex visual symptoms. CONCLUSION: A combined clinic with neurological, ophthalmic, and psychiatric input is an effective way to diagnose and manage complex visual problems in older people.
Authors: F R Verhey; J Jolles; R W Ponds; N Rozendaal; L A Plugge; R C de Vet; F W Vreeling; P J van der Lugt Journal: J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 1993 Impact factor: 2.198