Literature DB >> 2305970

Neural tube formation in the mouse: a morphometric and computerized three-dimensional reconstruction study of the relationship between apical constriction of neuroepithelial cells and the shape of the neuroepithelium.

K T Bush1, F J Lynch, A S DeNittis, A B Steinberg, H Y Lee, R G Nagele.   

Abstract

Morphometry and computerized three-dimensional reconstruction were used to study the relationship between apical constriction of neuroepithelial cells and the pattern of bending of the neuroepithelium in the developing neural tube of the 12-somite mouse embryo. The neuroepithelium of the mouse exhibits prominent regional variations in size and shape along the embryo axis. The complex shape of most of the cephalic neural tube (e.g., forebrain and midbrain) is due to the coexistence of concave and convex bending sites whereas more caudal regions (e.g., hindbrain and spinal cord) generally lack sites of convex bending and have a relatively simple shape. The apical morphology of neuroepithelial cells was found to be correlated more closely with the local status of bending of the neuroepithelium than with the specific region of the neural tube in which they are located. In areas of enhanced apical constriction, microfilament bundles were particularly prominent. Morphometry revealed that patterns of bending of the neuroepithelium were correlated almost exactly with those of apical constriction throughout the forming neural tube. These findings support the idea that apical constriction of neuroepithelial cells, resulting from tension generated by microfilament bundles, plays a major role in bending of the neuroepithelium during neural tube formation in the mouse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2305970     DOI: 10.1007/bf00189727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)        ISSN: 0340-2061


  33 in total

1.  Effects of cytochalasin B on the morphogenesis of explanted early chick embryos.

Authors:  H Y Lee; G W Kalmus
Journal:  Growth       Date:  1976-06

2.  Action of papaverine and ionophore A23187 on neurulation.

Authors:  D Moran; R W Rice
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Intrinsic and extrinsic factors collaborate to generate driving forces for neural tube formation in the chick: a study using morphometry and computerized three-dimensional reconstruction.

Authors:  R G Nagele; K T Bush; M C Kosciuk; E T Hunter; A B Steinberg; H Y Lee
Journal:  Brain Res Dev Brain Res       Date:  1989-11-01

4.  Possible involvement of calmodulin in apical constriction of neuroepithelial cells and elevation of neural folds in the chick.

Authors:  H Lee; R G Nagele
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1985-09-15

Review 5.  A review of the theories of vertebrate neurulation and their relationship to the mechanics of neural tube birth defects.

Authors:  R Gordon
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1985-11

6.  Actin distribution patterns in the mouse neural tube during neurulation.

Authors:  T W Sadler; D Greenberg; P Coughlin; J L Lessard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-01-08       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Fine structure of the lumbosacral neural folds in the mouse embryo.

Authors:  D B Wilson; L A Finta
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1980-02

8.  Biomechanical basis of diazepam-induced neural tube defects in early chick embryos: a morphometric study.

Authors:  R G Nagele; K T Bush; E T Hunter; M C Kosciuk; H Lee
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1989-07

9.  Neural tube closure defects caused by papaverine in explanted early chick embryos.

Authors:  H Lee; R G Nagele
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1979-10

10.  Neural tube closure defects following in vitro exposure of mouse embryos to xylocaine.

Authors:  K S O'Shea; M H Kaufman
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1980-11
View more
  13 in total

1.  Development of the rat telencephalon--volumetric analysis.

Authors:  Selma Alicelebić; Durdica Grbesa
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.363

2.  Embryogenesis of the rat telencephalon--a morphologic and stereologic analysis.

Authors:  Selma Alicelebić; Durdica Grbesa
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.363

3.  Effects of environmental parameters on the formation and turnover of acetate by forest soils.

Authors:  K Kusel; H L Drake
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Mass Spectrometric Studies of the Effect of pH on the Accumulation of Intermediates in Denitrification by Paracoccus denitrificans.

Authors:  J K Thomsen; T Geest; R P Cox
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Morphogenesis of the rat forebrain.

Authors:  Selma Alicelebić; Zakira Mornjaković; Zlata Kundurović
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.363

6.  Lipid droplets of neuroepithelial cells are a major calcium storage site during neural tube formation in chick and mouse embryos.

Authors:  K T Bush; H Lee; R G Nagele
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1992-05-15

7.  Patterns of lectin binding during mammalian neurogenesis.

Authors:  D B Wilson; D P Wyatt
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 8.  Apical constriction: a cell shape change that can drive morphogenesis.

Authors:  Jacob M Sawyer; Jessica R Harrell; Gidi Shemer; Jessica Sullivan-Brown; Minna Roh-Johnson; Bob Goldstein
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  Wnt5a regulates ventral midbrain morphogenesis and the development of A9-A10 dopaminergic cells in vivo.

Authors:  Emma R Andersson; Nilima Prakash; Lukas Cajanek; Eleonora Minina; Vitezslav Bryja; Lenka Bryjova; Terry P Yamaguchi; Anita C Hall; Wolfgang Wurst; Ernest Arenas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Lulu regulates Shroom-induced apical constriction during neural tube closure.

Authors:  Chih-Wen Chu; Emma Gerstenzang; Olga Ossipova; Sergei Y Sokol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.