OBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests eosinophils may be acting as antigen-presenting cells (APCs) by presenting antigen to T cells. We investigated the surface proteins of eosinophils and T cells in the esophageal biopsies of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: : Subjects were categorized as EoE, GERD, or HC. In esophageal tissue, EG2+ eosinophils were stained for the APC markers, CD40 or CD80, via immunohistochemistry. CD3+ T cells were stained for costimulatory markers, CD40L or CD28, and for activation markers, CD69 or CD134, via immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Eosinophils stained with CD40 and CD80. The number of EG2+CD40+ cells was increased in EoE (mean 19.1±14.8 cells/high-power field [HPF], n=11), compared with GERD (mean 0.13±0.19 cells/HPF, n=5, P<0.01) and HC (mean 0.3±0.7 cells/HPF, n=5, P<0.01). There was an elevation in EG2+CD80+ cells in EoE (mean 18.1±16.2 cells/HPF, n=10), GERD (mean 1.7±2.8 cells/HPF, n=6, P<0.01), or HC (mean 0.8±1.3 cells/HPF, n=6, P<0.01). CD3+ T cells stained with CD40L (not quantified). CD3+ T cells stained with CD28 at elevated levels in EoE (mean 14±8.7 cells/HPF, n=9) versus GERD (mean 3.3±1.2 cells/HPF, n=6, P<0.05) or HC (mean 3.0±3.2 cells/HPF, n=7, P<0.01). The number of CD3+CD69+ cells was highest in EoE (mean 14.8±7.5 cells/HPF, n=6) versus GERD (mean 0.8±0.9 cells/HPF, n=6, P<0.001) or HC (mean 2.7±2.5 cells/HPF, n=6, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We show that esophageal eosinophils express CD40 and CD80, and T cells with CD40L, CD28, and CD69. The number of double-stained cells was higher in EoE in comparison to control groups. These data support the hypothesis that eosinophils in EoE may act as APCs, activating T cells.
OBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests eosinophils may be acting as antigen-presenting cells (APCs) by presenting antigen to T cells. We investigated the surface proteins of eosinophils and T cells in the esophageal biopsies of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: : Subjects were categorized as EoE, GERD, or HC. In esophageal tissue, EG2+ eosinophils were stained for the APC markers, CD40 or CD80, via immunohistochemistry. CD3+ T cells were stained for costimulatory markers, CD40L or CD28, and for activation markers, CD69 or CD134, via immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Eosinophils stained with CD40 and CD80. The number of EG2+CD40+ cells was increased in EoE (mean 19.1±14.8 cells/high-power field [HPF], n=11), compared with GERD (mean 0.13±0.19 cells/HPF, n=5, P<0.01) and HC (mean 0.3±0.7 cells/HPF, n=5, P<0.01). There was an elevation in EG2+CD80+ cells in EoE (mean 18.1±16.2 cells/HPF, n=10), GERD (mean 1.7±2.8 cells/HPF, n=6, P<0.01), or HC (mean 0.8±1.3 cells/HPF, n=6, P<0.01). CD3+ T cells stained with CD40L (not quantified). CD3+ T cells stained with CD28 at elevated levels in EoE (mean 14±8.7 cells/HPF, n=9) versus GERD (mean 3.3±1.2 cells/HPF, n=6, P<0.05) or HC (mean 3.0±3.2 cells/HPF, n=7, P<0.01). The number of CD3+CD69+ cells was highest in EoE (mean 14.8±7.5 cells/HPF, n=6) versus GERD (mean 0.8±0.9 cells/HPF, n=6, P<0.001) or HC (mean 2.7±2.5 cells/HPF, n=6, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We show that esophageal eosinophils express CD40 and CD80, and T cells with CD40L, CD28, and CD69. The number of double-stained cells was higher in EoE in comparison to control groups. These data support the hypothesis that eosinophils in EoE may act as APCs, activating T cells.
Authors: T T Hansel; J B Braunstein; C Walker; K Blaser; P L Bruijnzeel; J C Virchow; C Virchow Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 1991-11 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Andreas Lackner; Reinhard Bernd Raggam; Heinz Stammberger; Alfred Beham; Hannes Braun; Barbara Kleinhappl; Walter Buzina; Clemens Kittinger; Sabine Reinisch; Andrea Berghold; Kurt Freudenschuss; Sonja Barth; Egon Marth Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2007-04-13 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Chris A Liacouras; Glenn T Furuta; Ikuo Hirano; Dan Atkins; Stephen E Attwood; Peter A Bonis; A Wesley Burks; Mirna Chehade; Margaret H Collins; Evan S Dellon; Ranjan Dohil; Gary W Falk; Nirmala Gonsalves; Sandeep K Gupta; David A Katzka; Alfredo J Lucendo; Jonathan E Markowitz; Richard J Noel; Robert D Odze; Philip E Putnam; Joel E Richter; Yvonne Romero; Eduardo Ruchelli; Hugh A Sampson; Alain Schoepfer; Nicholas J Shaheen; Scott H Sicherer; Stuart Spechler; Jonathan M Spergel; Alex Straumann; Barry K Wershil; Marc E Rothenberg; Seema S Aceves Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2011-04-07 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Joaquín Rodríguez-Sánchez; Marcial García Rojo; Bartolomé López Viedma; Eva de la Santa Belda; Pilar Olivencia Palomar; Elisa Gómez Torrijos; Lucia González López; José Olmedo Camacho Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: C Lingblom; J Wallander; M Ingelsten; H Bergquist; M Bove; R Saalman; A Welin; C Wennerås Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Jason J Xenakis; Emily D Howard; Kalmia M Smith; Courtney L Olbrich; Yanjun Huang; Dilanjan Anketell; Samuel Maldonado; Evangeline W Cornwell; Lisa A Spencer Journal: Immunology Date: 2018-01-21 Impact factor: 7.397