Literature DB >> 23059479

Reproducibility of anterior chamber angle measurement using the Tongren ultrasound biomicroscopy analysis system.

Zhong Lin1, Da P Mou, Yuan B Liang, Si Z Li, Rui Zhang, Su J Fan, Ning L Wang, Ravi Thomas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the intraobserver and interobserver variability of new software for the analysis of anterior chamber-angle images obtained using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive UBM images of 4 quadrants (the superior, the nasal, the temporal, and the inferior) of 30 primary angle-closure suspects (PACSs) and 30 normal subjects with open angles were selected. Two observers used the new UBM image analysis software to calculate the following parameters on 2 separate occasions: angle opening distance (AOD), trabecular-iris angle (TIA), angle recess area (ARA), trabecular-ciliary process distance (TCPD), iris-ciliary process distance (ICPD), and iris thickness (IT). Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility were measured using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots.
RESULTS: For intraobserver measurements in PACS, the range of ICC for AODs, TIAs, ARAs, TCPDs, ICPDs, and ITs in the 4 quadrants were 0.77 to 0.94, 0.80 to 0.92, 0.82 to 0.94, 0.51 to 0.73, 0.42 to 0.78, and 0.76 to 0.89; in open angles, these were 0.83 to 0.94, 0.80 to 0.93, 0.84 to 0.93, 0.57 to 0.89, 0.57 to 0.84, and 0.70 to 0.95. For interobserver measurements in PACS, the range of ICC for AODs, TIAs, ARAs, TCPDs, ICPDs, and ITs in the same quadrants as above were 0.52 to 0.89, 0.65 to 0.92, 0.68 to 0.92, 0.22 to 0.80, 0.48 to 0.93, and 0.29 to 0.75; in open angles, these were 0.57 to 0.87, 0.60 to 0.86, 0.64 to 0.90, 0.27 to 0.94, 0.56 to 0.93, and 0.28 to 0.66.
CONCLUSIONS: Angle width (AOD, TIA, and ARA) and IT of both PACS and open angles could be reliably measured by the same observer; interobserver measurements and those related to the ciliary process (TCPD and ICPD) were more variable. For the current version of this software, we recommend measurements of anterior chamber parameters by the same observer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23059479     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182698094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  6 in total

1.  Ultrasound biomicroscopy in patients with unilateral pseudoexfoliation.

Authors:  Erkan Ünsal; Kadir Eltutar; Ilkay Muftuoglu; Tulay Alpar Akcetin; Yıldız Acar
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  A novel method for measuring anterior segment area of the eye on ultrasound biomicroscopic images using photoshop.

Authors:  Zhonghao Wang; Xuanwei Liang; Ziqiang Wu; Jialiu Lin; Jingjing Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Differences between fellow eyes of acute and chronic primary angle closure (glaucoma): An ultrasound biomicroscopy quantitative study.

Authors:  Mengwei Li; Yuhong Chen; Xiaoxiao Chen; Wenqing Zhu; Xueli Chen; Xiaolei Wang; Yuan Fang; Xiangmei Kong; Yi Dai; Junyi Chen; Xinghuai Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Transscleral cyclophotocoagulation followed by cataract surgery: a novel protocol to treat refractory acute primary angle closure.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Luning Qin; Chenjia Xu; Dandan Huang; Ruru Guo; Jian Ji; Nomdo M Jansonius
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Assessment of Anterior Segment Changes in Pseudophakic Eyes, Using Ultrasonic Biomicroscopic Imaging, after Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Silicone Oil or Gas Tamponade.

Authors:  Erkan Ünsal; Kadir Eltutar; Belma Karini; Osman Kızılay
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 6.  Anterior segment imaging in glaucoma: An updated review.

Authors:  Jessica S Maslin; Yaniv Barkana; Syril K Dorairaj
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.848

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.