Literature DB >> 23059404

The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics and caesarean delivery.

Frank A Chervenak1, Laurence B McCullough.   

Abstract

In this chapter, we provide an account of the professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics, and identify its implications for two major topics: patient-choice caesarean delivery and trial of labour after caesarean delivery. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics is based on the ethical concept of medicine as a profession and the ethical principles of beneficence and respect for autonomy. The obstetrician has beneficence-based and autonomy-based obligations to the pregnant woman and beneficence-based obligations to the fetus when it is a patient. Because the viable fetus is a patient, the ethics of caesarean delivery requires balancing of obligations to the pregnant and fetal patient. The implication of the professional responsibility model for patient-choice caesarean delivery is that the obstetrician should respond to such requests with a recommendation against non-indicated caesarean delivery and for vaginal delivery. These recommendations should be explained and discussed in the informed consent process. It is ethically permissible to implement an informed, reflective decision for non-indicated caesarean delivery. The implication for trial of labour after caesarean delivery is that, in settings properly equipped and staffed, the obstetrician should offer both trial of labour after caesarean delivery and planned caesarean delivery to women who have had one previous low transverse incision. The obstetrician should recommend against trial of labour after caesarean delivery for women with a previous classical incision.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23059404     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 1521-6934            Impact factor:   5.237


  4 in total

1.  Ultrasound's 'window on the womb' brings ethical challenges for balancing maternal and fetal health interests: obstetricians' experiences in Australia.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Rhonda Small; Ann Lalos; Margareta Persson; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.652

2.  How to reach trustworthy decisions for caesarean sections on maternal request: a call for beneficial power.

Authors:  Kristiane T Eide; Kristine Bærøe
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 5.926

3.  Head in the sand: Contemporary Australian attitudes towards induction of labour.

Authors:  Harsha Ananthram; Ajay Rane
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 1.884

4.  Varying gestational age patterns in cesarean delivery: an international comparison.

Authors:  Marie Delnord; Béatrice Blondel; Nicolas Drewniak; Kari Klungsøyr; Francisco Bolumar; Ashna Mohangoo; Mika Gissler; Katarzyna Szamotulska; Nicholas Lack; Jan Nijhuis; Petr Velebil; Luule Sakkeus; James Chalmers; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.