OBJECTIVES: This study aims to further elucidate the role of adrenergic transmission in erection and to highlight whether adrenergic transmission in the penis modulates sildenafil's action. METHODS: Measurement of intracavernosal pressure in the anesthetized rat model. KEY FINDINGS: Guanethidine (3 and 6 mg/kg) potentiated intracavernosal pressure/mean arterial pressure (ICP/MAP) rises in response to cavernous nerve stimulation by 4.375 ± 0.425 and 18.375 ± 1.085% respectively. Propranolol did the opposite. In presence of guanethidine, sildenafil (0.01, 0.1 and 1 mg/kg) potentiated ICP/MAP responses by 81.571 ± 4.918%, 147.83 ± 10.864% and 279.285 ± 23.053% at 1 Hz compared to 22.277 ± 2.139%, 123.571 ± 8.443% and 186.25 ± 13.542% respectively in the absence of guanethidine. Propranolol inhibited the effect sildenafil at all frequencies of stimulation. Verapamil exhibited a pro-erectile action and potentiated the effect of sildenafil (0.01, 0.1 and 1 mg/kg) on erectile responses corresponding to 85.25 ± 6.716%, 146 ± 11.288% and 221.571 ± 19.032% respectively compared to 26.011 ± 1.911%, 87.142 ± 8.73% and 182.2 ± 16.921% in its absence. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides functional evidence that inhibition of sympathetic tone peripherally results in enhancement of erectile function. β-adrenergic receptors seem to play an important role in erection. The combination of sildenafil and guanethidine or verapamil could have a potential advantage on erectile function but propranolol may mask the effect of sildenafil on erectile function.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to further elucidate the role of adrenergic transmission in erection and to highlight whether adrenergic transmission in the penis modulates sildenafil's action. METHODS: Measurement of intracavernosal pressure in the anesthetized rat model. KEY FINDINGS:Guanethidine (3 and 6 mg/kg) potentiated intracavernosal pressure/mean arterial pressure (ICP/MAP) rises in response to cavernous nerve stimulation by 4.375 ± 0.425 and 18.375 ± 1.085% respectively. Propranolol did the opposite. In presence of guanethidine, sildenafil (0.01, 0.1 and 1 mg/kg) potentiated ICP/MAP responses by 81.571 ± 4.918%, 147.83 ± 10.864% and 279.285 ± 23.053% at 1 Hz compared to 22.277 ± 2.139%, 123.571 ± 8.443% and 186.25 ± 13.542% respectively in the absence of guanethidine. Propranolol inhibited the effect sildenafil at all frequencies of stimulation. Verapamil exhibited a pro-erectile action and potentiated the effect of sildenafil (0.01, 0.1 and 1 mg/kg) on erectile responses corresponding to 85.25 ± 6.716%, 146 ± 11.288% and 221.571 ± 19.032% respectively compared to 26.011 ± 1.911%, 87.142 ± 8.73% and 182.2 ± 16.921% in its absence. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides functional evidence that inhibition of sympathetic tone peripherally results in enhancement of erectile function. β-adrenergic receptors seem to play an important role in erection. The combination of sildenafil and guanethidine or verapamil could have a potential advantage on erectile function but propranolol may mask the effect of sildenafil on erectile function.