Literature DB >> 23057017

Influence of diamondlike carbon-coated screws on the implant-abutment interface.

Juliana Socas Vanoni Diez1, Vinicius Carvalho Brigagão, Leonardo Gonçalves Cunha, Ana Christina Claro Neves, Laís Regiane da Silva-Concilio.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the implant-abutment interface area and the abutment screw loosening value when diamondlike carbon (DLC)-coated or titanium screws were used before and after cyclic loading.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six implants were divided into four groups according to the type of connection (external hexagon [EH] or internal hexagon [IH]) and the type of abutment screw (with [EHD/IHD] or without [EHT/IHT] DLC coating). The implants were placed in epoxy resin-glass fiber composite, and crowns cast in a metal alloy were screwed to the implants. The implant-abutment interface was measured before (VG1) and after (VG2) cyclic loading. The removal torque values were recorded.
RESULTS: In groups with titanium screws, there was an increase in the implant-abutment interface area from VG1 to VG2, whereas in groups with DLC-coated screws, the interface area was reduced (EHT = 4.49%, IHT = 24.32%, EHD = -1.05%, IHD = -9.95%). In the IHT group only, the implant-abutment interface area showed a statistically significant difference between VG1 and VG2. The Pearson correlation indicated no significant differences among the studied factors, where r = -0.11 for EHT, 0.14 for EHD, 0.07 for IHT, and 0.43 for IHD.
CONCLUSIONS: The implant-abutment interface areas in groups with an EH connection were larger than those in groups with an IH connection, regardless of the type of screws used. The screw loosening values decreased in all groups after cyclic loading. No correlation between the implant-abutment interface area and the screw loosening value was seen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23057017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  6 in total

Review 1.  Is the internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Eduardo Piza Pellizzer; Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva; Liliane da Rocha Bonatto; Daniela Micheline dos Santos
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-25

2.  Temperature rise during removal of fractured components out of the implant body: an in vitro study comparing two ultrasonic devices and five implant types.

Authors:  Eric W Meisberger; Sjoerd J G Bakker; Marco S Cune
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2015-03-20

3.  Implant-Abutment Misfit after Cyclic Loading: An In Vitro Experimental Study.

Authors:  John Eversong Lucena de Vasconcelos; Jefferson David Melo de Matos; Daher Antonio Queiroz; Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer Lopes; Bruna Caroline Gonçalves Vasconcelos de Lacerda; Marco Antonio Bottino; Cecilia Pedroso Turssi; Roberta Tarkany Basting; Flávia Lucisano Botelho do Amaral; Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  In Vitro Bacterial Leakage at the Implant-Abutment Connection of Two Dental Implant Systems with Internal Connection.

Authors:  Azadeh Khajavi; Shabnam Mohseni; Amir Peymani; Mehrak Amjadi
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2020-12-08

5.  Comparative study of abutment screw loosening with or without adhesive material.

Authors:  Mahnaz Arshad; Gholamreza Shirani; Sina Refoua; Mohammadreza Rahimi Yeganeh
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Comparison of the Effect of Four Different Abutment Screw Torques on Screw Loosening in Single Implant-Supported Prosthesis after the Application of Mechanical Loading.

Authors:  Behnaz Ebadian; Amirhossein Fathi; Saba Khodadad
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-07-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.