| Literature DB >> 23057007 |
Ankur Rohilla1, M U Khan, Razia Khanam.
Abstract
The present study investigated the probable role of simvastatin, 3-hydroxymethyl-glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, in abrogated cardioprotection in hyperhomocysteinemic (Hhcy) rat hearts. Isolated Langendorff's perfused normal and Hhcy rat hearts were subjected to 30-min global ischemia (I) followed by 120-min reperfusion (R). Assessment of myocardial damage was done by measuring infarct size and analyzing the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and creatine kinase (CK-MB) in coronary effluent. In addition, the oxidative stress in the heart was assessed by measuring lipid peroxidation and superoxide anion generation. I/R produced myocardial injury in normal and Hhcy rat hearts by increasing myocardial infarct size, LDH and CK in coronary effluent and oxidative stress. Hhcy rat hearts showed enhanced myocardial injury and high oxidative stress as compared to normal hearts. Treatment with Simvastatin (10 μMol) afforded cardioprotection against I/R-induced myocardial injury in normal and hyperhomocysteinemic rat hearts as assessed in terms of reductions in myocardial infarct size, LDH and CK levels in coronary effluent and oxidative stress. The reductions in the high degree of oxidative stress may be responsible for the observed cardioprotection afforded by simvastatin against I/R-induced myocardial injury in normal and hyperhomocysteinemic rat hearts.Entities:
Keywords: Hyperhomocysteinemia; oxidative stress; simvastatin
Year: 2012 PMID: 23057007 PMCID: PMC3459450 DOI: 10.4103/2231-4040.101018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Pharm Technol Res ISSN: 0976-2094
Figure 1Diagram showing schematic representation of experimental protocol
Figure 2Effect of simvastatin in I/R-induced increase in CK levels Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. a = P< 0.05 vs Normal Control; b = P< 0.05 vs I/R Control; c = P<0.05 vs Hhcy-Control; d = P< 0.05 vs I/R control; e = P<0.05 vs Hhcy-IR Control.
Figure 3Effect of simvastatin in I/R-induced increase in LDH levels Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. a = P< 0.05 vs Normal Control; b = P< 0.05 vs I/R Control; c = P<0.05 vs Hhcy-Control; d = P< 0.05 vs I/R control; e = P<0.05 vs Hhcy-IR Control.
Figure 4Effect of simvastatin in I/R-induced increase in infarct size Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. a = p< 0.05 vs normal control; b = P< 0.05 vs I/R Control; c = P<0.05 vs Hhcy-Control; d = P< 0.05 vs I/R control; e = P<0.05 vs Hhcy-IR Control.
Figure 5Effect of simvastatin on I/R-induced increase in TBARS levels. Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. a = P< 0.05 vs Normal Control; b = P< 0.05 vs I/R Control; c = P<0.05 vs Hhcy-Control; d = P< 0.05 vs I/R control; e = P<0.05 vs Hhcy-IR Control.
Figure 6Effect of simvastatin on I/R-induced increase in superoxide anion generation Values are expressed as mean ± S.D. a = P< 0.05 vs Normal Control; b = P< 0.05 vs I/R Control; c = P<0.05 vs Hhcy-Control; d = P< 0.05 vs I/R control; e = P<0.05 vs Hhcy-IR Control.