| Literature DB >> 23056997 |
Mohsen Farkhoy1, Mehrdad Modirsanei, Omid Ghavidel, Majid Sadegh, Sadegh Jafarnejad.
Abstract
Four experiments were conducted, in two stages, to evaluate protein and limiting amino acids' (lysine and methionine + cystine) levels in pre-starter diets on broilers' performance. In each experiment of Stage 1, 640 new-born male Ross 308 cockerels were randomly allocated to eight dietary treatments with a 2 × 4 factorial arrangement. In experiment 1-1, two levels of crude protein (CP: 21% and 23.2%) and four levels of Lys (1.2, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5%) and in experiment 1-2, two levels of CP (21 and 23.2%) and four levels of Met + Cys (0.85, 0.90, 0.95, and 1.00%) were used. In Stage 2, the optimum levels of Lys and Met + Cys obtained from Stage 1 (1.3 and 1.5% Lys, 0.90 and 1.00% Met + Cys in experiment 1-1 and 1-2, resp.) with two levels of CP (21 and 23.2%) were used in two separate simultaneous experiments with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement for male and female birds. The levels of CP significantly influenced BWG and FCR in experiment 1-1. Dietary levels of Lys affect BWG (experiment 1-1) and FI (experiments 1-1 and 2-1) significantly. In experiments 1-2 and 2-2, the different levels of Met + Cys did not affect BWG, FI, and FCR of male or female broilers. The results of these experiments indicated that the optimal level of dietary protein and Lys were 23.2% and 1.5%, respectively. Diets with 1% Met + Cys caused optimal performance.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23056997 PMCID: PMC3465898 DOI: 10.1155/2012/394189
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Med Int ISSN: 2042-0048
The composition and calculated chemical analysis of diets in Experiment 1-1.
| Ingredients (g/Kg) | Treatments | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | T7 | T8 | |
| Corn | 520 | 522 | 524 | 531 | 565 | 567 | 568 | 571 |
| Soybean meal (44%) | 376 | 375 | 374 | 368 | 338 | 337 | 336 | 335 |
| Soy oil | 35 | 34 | 33 | 32 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 25 |
| Monocalcium phosphate | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 |
| Limestone | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| Premix vit + min.1, 2 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Salt | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
|
| ||||||||
| Calculated nutrients values | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Metabolizable energy (Kcal/Kg) | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 |
| Crude protein (%) | 23.2 | 23.2 | 23.2 | 23.2 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 |
| Calcium (%) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Available phosphorus (%) | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 |
| Na (%) | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 |
| Arginine | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.38 | 1.30 | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.29 |
| Lysine (%) | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| Methionine + cystine (%) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
1Each kg of premix provided vitamin A, 10000 IU; vitamin D3, 2500 IU; vitamin K, 2.4 mg; vitamin E, 44 IU; biotin, 0.1 mg; folic acid, 2.0 mg; niacin, 25 mg; calcium pantothenate, 14.32 mg; pyridoxine, 3.10 mg; riboflavin, 5 mg; thiamin, 1.2 mg; vitamin B12, 10.5 μg; Fe, 85 mg; Mn, 125 mg; Cu, 7.8 mg; Se, 0.09 mg; Zn, 60 mg; choline chloride, 5.5 mg.
2Lysine and methionine were added inside of premix.
The composition and calculated chemical analysis of diets in Experiment 1-2.
| Ingredients (g/Kg) | Treatments | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | T7 | T8 | |
| Corn | 522 | 521 | 521 | 520 | 566 | 565 | 565 | 565 |
| Soybean meal (44%) | 374 | 375 | 375 | 376 | 337 | 338 | 338 | 338 |
| Soy oil | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 |
| Monocalcium phosphate | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| Limestone | 14.4 | 14.4 | 14.4 | 14.4 | 14.4 | 14.4 | 14.4 | 14.4 |
| Premix vit + min.1, 2 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Salt | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 |
|
| ||||||||
| Calculated chemical analysis | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Metabolizable energy (Kcal/Kg) | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 |
| Crude protein (%) | 23.2 | 23.2 | 23.2 | 23.2 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 |
| Calcium (%) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Available phosphorus (%) | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 |
| Na (%) | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 |
| Arginine | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.39 |
| Lysine (%) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Methionine + cystine (%) | 0.85 | 0.9 | 0.95 | 1 | 0.85 | 0.9 | 0.95 | 1 |
1Each kg of premix provided vitamin A, 10000 IU; vitamin D3, 2500 IU; vitamin K, 2.4 mg; vitamin E, 44 IU; biotin, 0.1 mg; folic acid, 2.0 mg; niacin, 25 mg; calcium pantothenate, 14.32 mg; pyridoxine, 3.10 mg; riboflavin, 5 mg; thiamin, 1.2 mg; vitamin B12, 10.5 μg; Fe, 85 mg; Mn, 125 mg; Cu, 7.8 mg; Se, 0.09 mg; Zn, 60 mg; choline chloride, 5.5 mg.
2Lysine and methionine were added inside of premix.
Effect of feeding diets containing various levels of crude protein (CP) and lysine (Lys) on body weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio of broiler chicks (Experiment 1-1).
| Treatments | BWG (gr) | FI (gr) | FCR (gr/gr) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | CP (%) | Lys (%) | 1–7 d | 1–10 d | 1–7 d | 1–10 d | 1–7 d | 1–10 d |
| 1 | 23.2 | 1.5 | 223.7a | 351.1a | 190.3a | 349.9 | 0.851 | 0.997 |
| 2 | 23.2 | 1.4 | 215.7ab | 338.9abc | 185.9ab | 343.8 | 0.862 | 1.014 |
| 3 | 23.2 | 1.3 | 215.6ab | 341.5ab | 190.7a | 350.1 | 0.885 | 1.025 |
| 4 | 23.2 | 1.2 | 205.7bc | 324.9cd | 180.0b | 340.4 | 0.875 | 1.032 |
| 5 | 21 | 1.5 | 210.7bc | 329.4bcd | 187.2ab | 344.2 | 0.888 | 1.045 |
| 6 | 21 | 1.4 | 209.1bc | 329.6bcd | 183.7ab | 343.0 | 0.879 | 1.041 |
| 7 | 21 | 1.3 | 207.6bc | 327.0bcd | 184.9ab | 339.7 | 0.891 | 1.039 |
| 8 | 21 | 1.2 | 204.1c | 316.4d | 178.9b | 333.2 | 0.877 | 1.053 |
| Pooled SEM | 3.05 | 4.41 | 2.39 | 4.21 | 0.016 | 0.015 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Probability | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Protein × lysine | * | * | * | NS | NS | NS | ||
| Protein | * | * | NS | NS | NS | * | ||
| Lysine | * | * | * | NS | NS | NS | ||
a–dMeans in each column without common superscripts are significantly different.
*Data are means of four replicates having 20 birds in each. BWG: body weight gain, FI: feed intake, FCR: feed conversion ratio, CP: crude protein, Lys: lysine, SEM: standard error of mean, NS: not statistically significant; *P < 0.05.
Effect of feeding diets containing various levels of crude protein (CP) and methionine + cystine (Met + Cys) on body weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio of broiler chicks (Experiment 1-2).
| Treatments | BWG (gr) | FI (gr) | FCR (gr/gr) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | CP (%) | Met + Cys (%) | 1–7 d | 1–10 d | 1–7 d | 1–10 d | 1–7 d | 1–10 d |
| 1 | 23.2 | 0.85 | 214.5 | 332.2a | 188.8 | 351.3a | 0.880a | 1.057ab |
| 2 | 23.2 | 0.90 | 217.8 | 341.8a | 184.4 | 352.1a | 0.847ab | 1.030bc |
| 3 | 23.2 | 0.95 | 215.4 | 340.4a | 177.2 | 333.0b | 0.823bc | 0.978c |
| 4 | 23.2 | 1.00 | 222.0 | 346.7a | 178.5 | 337.5b | 0.804c | 0.973c |
| 5 | 21 | 0.85 | 216.3 | 337.4a | 182.6 | 343.4ab | 0.844ab | 1.018bc |
| 6 | 21 | 0.90 | 213.3 | 330.8a | 185.0 | 345.0ab | 0.867a | 1.043ab |
| 7 | 21 | 0.95 | 208.8 | 312.5b | 180.6 | 337.0b | 0.865a | 1.078a |
| 8 | 21 | 1.00 | 214.0 | 333.6a | 183.5 | 340.6ab | 0.857ab | 1.021bc |
| Pooled SEM | 2.45 | 4.43 | 2.89 | 4.71 | 0.011 | 0.011 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Probability | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Protein × (Met + Cys) | NS | * | NS | * | ** | * | ||
| Protein | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
| Met + Cys | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
a–dMeans in each column without common superscripts are significantly different.
*Data are means of four replicates having 20 birds in each replicate. BWG: body weight gain, FI: feed intake, FCR: feed conversion ratio, CP: crude protein, Met + Cys: methionine + cystine, SEM: standard error of mean, NS: not statistically significant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Effect of feeding diets containing two levels of crude protein (CP) and lysine (Lys) on body weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion ratio of male or female broiler chicks at 10 d (Experiment 2-1).
| Treatments | BWG (g) | Feed intake (g) | FCR (g/g) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | CP (%) | Lys (%) | male | female | male | female | male | female |
| 1 | 23.2 | 1.5 | 336.8 | 327.4 | 339.3 | 335.9 | 1.007 | 1.026 |
| 2 | 23.2 | 1.3 | 327.5 | 321.4 | 344.0 | 330.5 | 1.051 | 1.028 |
| 3 | 21 | 1.5 | 322.2 | 320.4 | 337.8 | 335.2 | 1.049 | 1.046 |
| 4 | 21 | 1.3 | 323.1 | 309.5 | 342.3 | 326.3 | 1.059 | 1.054 |
| Pooled SEM | 4.22 | 4.05 | 2.97 | 4.50 | 0.010 | 0.015 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Probability | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Protein × Lysine | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
| Protein | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
| Lysine | NS | NS | * | NS | NS | NS | ||
a–dMeans in each column without common superscripts are significantly different.
*Mean of four replicates having 50 birds. BWG: Body weight gain, FI: Feed intake, FCR: Feed conversion ratio, CP: Crude protein, Lys: Lysine; SEM Standard error of mean; NS: Not-statistically significant; *P < 0.05.
Effect of feeding diets containing two levels of crude protein (CP) and methionine + cystine (Met + Cys) on body weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion ratio of male or female broiler chicks at 10 d (Experiment 2-2).
| Treatments | BWG (g) | Feed intake (g) | FCR (g/g) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | CP (%) | Met + Cys (%) | male | female | male | female | male | female |
| 1 | 23.2 | 1.00 | 323.2ab | 322.3 | 334.8b | 332.6 | 1.037 | 1.032 |
| 2 | 23.2 | 0.90 | 330.5a | 318.3 | 344.7a | 336.4 | 1.043 | 1.057 |
| 3 | 21 | 1.00 | 326.5a | 317.4 | 340.0ab | 330.1 | 1.042 | 1.041 |
| 4 | 21 | 0.90 | 312.5b | 318.1 | 339.5ab | 330.6 | 1.087 | 1.039 |
| Pooled SEM | 3.1 | 3.87 | 2.3 | 3.37 | 0.017 | 0.012 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Probability | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Protein × (Met + Cys) | * | NS | * | NS | NS | NS | ||
| Protein | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
| Met + Cys | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
a–dMeans in each column without common superscripts are significantly different.
*Data are means off our 4 replicates having 50 birds. BWG: Body weight gain, FI: Feed intake, FCR: Feed conversion ratio, CP: Crude protein, Met + Cys: Methionine + Cystine, NS: Not-statistically significant; *P < 0.05.