Literature DB >> 23056764

Detecting Common CFTR Mutations by Reverse Dot Blot Hybridization Method in Cystic Fibrosis First Report from Northern Iran.

Mohammad-Reza Esmaeili Dooki1, Haleh Akhavan-Niaki, Ali Ghabeli Juibary.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cystic fibrosis and its distribution vary widely in different countries and/or ethnic groups. Common cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutations were reported from Iran, but the northern population was not or underrepresented in those studies. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of common CFTR mutations in children from northern Iran.
METHODS: Thirty unrelated Iranian cystic fibrosis patients aged less than 11 years and living in Mazandaran province (in Iran) were screened for 5 common CFTR gene mutations. deltaF508, N1303K, G542X, R347H and W1282X using Reverse Dot Blot method.
FINDINGS: Only one mutation, DeltaF508, was found in 7 patients accounting for 21.7% (13/60) of alleles.
CONCLUSION: These findings can be used for planning future screening and appropriate genetic counseling programs in Iranian CF families.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CFTR; Children; Cystic Fibrosis; DeltaF508-CFTR; Genotype; Iran

Year:  2011        PMID: 23056764      PMCID: PMC3446107     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Pediatr        ISSN: 2008-2142            Impact factor:   0.364


Introduction

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive disease caused by defect in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. The protein product of the gene is a chloride channel and a member of the ATP-binding cassette membrane transporter superfamily. The CFTR channel is critical for the normal function of epithelial cells in the lungs, pancreas, intestine, gall bladder, and sweat glands. Excess mucus in the respiratory system of CF patients facilitates chronic bacterial infections, leading to respiratory failure, which is the major cause of mortality. Most of the patients also fail to produce digestive enzymes in the pancreas, resulting in pancreatic insufficiency. Other clinical features are variably associated with the disease[1]. Approximately one in 2000 to 3000 newborns in populations of European ancestry are affected, and the average carrier frequency is about 1:25[2, 3]. The p.F508del (ΔF508) allele of the gene is the most common mutation observed worldwide and is probably very old, dating to pre-Neolithic times[2, 4]. In addition to the ΔF508 mutation, more than 1000 other mutations in the CFTR gene have been identified (CF Genetic Analysis Consortium http://www.genet.sickkids. on.ca/cftr). These mutations vary greatly in their frequency and distribution, but most are very rare. Only four (p.G542X, p.N1303K, p.G551D and p.W1282X) have overall frequencies higher than 1%[5]. Intriguingly, p.G542X and p.N1303K are found on the same haplotype background as ΔF508, suggesting that they arose in the same population[6]. Few previous reports of CFTR mutations in Iran have been published[7-9]. In the present study, 5 of the 27 CFTR exons of 30 unrelated northern Iranian CF patients were analyzed with the aim of detecting common CFTR mutations in this population. In addition, the clinical presentations and laboratory findings were studied based on hospital and outpatient records. We selected five mutations, deltaF508, N1303K, G542X, R347H and W1282X based on previous reports in Iran and neighboring countries. The knowledge of the mutation spectrum and its frequency in this population will improve the diagnosis and medical care of CF patients and could also be used as a basis for carrier screening and prenatal diagnosis programming in Iran. Several techniques such as allele specific oligonucleotide (ASO) dot-blot, reverse dot-blot, amplification refractory mutation (ARMS), and an oligo-ligation assay, are available to detect the most common mutations[10]. The reverse dot-blot (RDB) technique is one of the most widely used techniques to diagnose CF[11-14]. This technique was evaluated as routine first-line analyses of the CFTR gene status[12, 15]. RDB is more advantageous than other techniques since it does not necessitate the use of radiolabled probes as in Allele Specific Oligonucleotide assay and the use of positive controls to show the proper functioning of PCR reaction in each tube as in ARMS assays, since in ARMS technique, results are based on the absence of PCR products[13]. In this study all 5 mutations were screened simultaneously using reverse dot blot (RDB) assay.

Subjects and Methods

Patients

The 30 patients were diagnosed as cystic fibrosis based on elevated sweat chloride values (>60 mEq/L) and were 6 weeks to 11 years old. Many patients had pulmonary complications and pancreatic insufficiency. The patients were recruited from a pediatric hospital (Amirkola Children's Hospital) in Mazandaran province, northern Iran. Some of them were diagnosed by the pediatric gastroenterologist in office. The patients originated from many different regions of Mazandaran. Families of the patients were informed of the nature of the research and consented to participate in this study.

Molecular Analysis

DNA from the leukocytes of peripheral blood was prepared by the salting out protocol. Mutation detection was performed using Reverse Dot Blot (RDB) procedure, as described by Lappin et al[16]. In this assay, oligonucleotide probes were synthesized using a C6-amino-linker on the 5' end of the product and were attached onto Biodyne C nylon membrane (Pall Corporation) activated by 1-Ethyl 3-Dimethyl Aminopropyl Carbodiimide (EDAC). The target DNA was amplified with 5' biotinylated primers and hybridized to immobilized oligonucleotides on the membrane. Hybridization was detected by adding streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase to the membrane where it bound to biotinylated DNA that was hybridized to the oligonucleotides. A positive signal could then be obtained by a simple non-radioactive colorimetric reaction. CFTR amplifications took place in 50-µL reactions containing 1X PCR buffer (10 mmol/L KCl, 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2) and 6 mmol/L MgCl2, 200 µmol/L each of dNTPs, 10 pmol of each primer, and 1.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase. All PCR reagents (except primers which were from MWG, Germany) were from Roche Company. PCR was performed in a Techgene thermocycler from Techne Co., UK). Thermo-cycling conditions were uniform for all reactions and included an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 3 minutes, followed by 38 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 54°C for 30 seconds and polymerization at 72°C for 30 seconds. Cycling culminated with a final extension at 72°C for 4 minutes. PCR products were visualized after electrophoresis on 1.5% Agarose LE gel under 302nm UV lamp. The hybridization reaction took place after adding the pooled PCR products to Biodyne membranes pre-wet with hybridization buffer [2X saline sodium citrate (SSC), 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)] at 42°C, The amplicons and membranes were boiled and permitted to hybridize for 1 hour at 42°C. Hybridization solutions were poured off and membranes were washed twice in excess of wash buffer (0.75_ SSC, 0.1% SDS). Membranes were then agitated in a freshly prepared conjugate solution (1:4000 dilution of streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate, (Boehringer Mannheim, Part No. 1089153), in 0.5X SSC, 0.1% SDS for 30 minutes at room temperature. At the end of the incubation, membranes were washed three times for 3 minutes each with 0.5X SSC, 0.1% SDS; then twice for three minutes each with 0.1 mol/L sodium citrate, pH 5.0. The membranes were then exposed to 0.01% w/v tetramethylbenzidine dihydro-chloride (TMB) substrate (Sigma T-8768) in a freshly prepared, dilute solution of hydrogen peroxide (0.00225% v/v) in 0.1M sodium citrate, pH 5.0 with agitation for 10 to 20 minutes. Color development was stopped by rinsing the membranes with distillated water. The details of probes and primers (MWG Biotech, Germany) used in this study are presented in Tables 1 and 2 respectively and were described previously by Lappin et al[16].
Table 1

Human cystic fibrosis transconductance regulator probes

Probe nameLocation in the CFTR geneCFTR probe sequence
ΔF508-N Exon105'-NH2-GAAACACCAAAGATGATA-3'
ΔF508-MUT Exon105'-NH2-GGAAACACCAATGATATT-3'
G542X-N Exon115'-NH2-TATAGTTCTTGGAGAAGGTG3'
G542X-MUT Exon115'-NH2-TATAGTTCTTTGAGAAGGTG-3'
W1282X-N Exon205'-NH2-GCTTTCCTCCACTGTTG-3'
W1282X-MUT Exon205'-NH2-CAACAGTGAAGGAAAGC-3'
N1303K-N Exon215'-NH2-AGAAAAAACTTGGATCC-3'
N1303K-MUT Exon215'-NH2-GGGATCCAACTTTTTTCT-3'
R347H-N Exon75'-NH2-AATTGTTCTGCGCATGG-3'
R347H-MUT Exon75'-NH2-CATTGTTCTGCCCATGGC-3'
Table 2

Human cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator primers

Cystic fibrosis mutation testedCystic fibrosis primer nameExon amplifiedCystic fibrosis primer sequence
R347P CF7-F75'-Biotin-AGACCATGCTCAGATCTTCCAT-3'
CF7-R5'-Biotin-GCAAAGTTCATTAGAACTGATC-3'
ΔF508 CF10-F105'-Biotin-GCAGAGTACCTGAAACAGGA-3'
CF10-R5'-Biotin-CATTCACAGTAGCTTACCCA-3'
G542X CF11-F115'-Biotin-CAACTGTGGTTAAAGCAATAGTGT-3'
CF20-R5'-Biotin-GCACAGATTCTGAGTAACCATAAT-3'
W1282X CF21-F205'-Biotin-TGGGCCTCTTGGGAAGAACT-3'
CF21-R5'-Biotin-CTCACCTGTGGTATCACTCC-3'
N1303K CF21-F215'-Biotin-GGTAAGTACATGGGTGTTTC-3'
CF21-R5'-Biotin-CAAAAGTACCCTGTTGCTCCA-3'
Human cystic fibrosis transconductance regulator probes Human cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator primers

Findings

Phenotype Analysis

30 unrelated patients (17 males and 13 females) aged 6 weeks to 11 years originating from Mazandaran province, Iran were analyzed in this study. Half of the patients were issued from consanguineous marriage (mostly between first cousins). All patients showed acute or persistent respiratory symptoms. 26 patients had failure to thrive and malnutrition and 25 patients had abnormal stools. None of the patients had a previous family history of CF. Other manifestations such as meconium ileus, intestinal obstruction, electrolyte abnormality, rectal prolapse, nasal polyps, sinus disease, diabetes mellitus, liver or gallbladder problems were observed in a small number of patients. The phenotype of subjects carrying CFTR mutations is reported in Table 3.
Table 3

phenotype of subjects carrying CFTR mutations

Clinical presentationsNumber of patients
Acute or persistent respiratory symptoms 30
Failure to thrive, malnutrition 26
Abnormal stools 25
Meconium ileus, intestinal obstruction 7
Family history 0
Electrolyte, acid-base abnormality 2
Rectal prolapse 2
Nasal polyps, sinus disease 3
Liver, gallbladder problems 4
Other* 4

*Other: acrodermatitis like rash, vitamin deficiency states, hypoproteinemic edema, hypoprothrombinemia with bleeding, meconium plug syndrome, diabetes mellitus

phenotype of subjects carrying CFTR mutations *Other: acrodermatitis like rash, vitamin deficiency states, hypoproteinemic edema, hypoprothrombinemia with bleeding, meconium plug syndrome, diabetes mellitus

Genotype Analysis

Mutation screening of the CFTR gene in 60 alleles by reverse dot blot hybridization for five common mutations showed that 13 (21.6%) alleles were ΔF508. Six patients were homozygous for ΔF508 and one patient was compound heterozygous for whom only one allele was specified. The other four mutations tested (N1303K, G542X, R 347H and W1282X) were not encountered in these patients.

Genotype-Phenotype Correlation

Table 4 shows phenotypes of 7 patients carrying deltaF508 mutation. All had respiratory difficulties and failure to thrive. Six of them evacuated abnormal stools and 4 had meconium ileus. Other manifestations such as edema and hypoproteinemia, liver and gallbladder problems, rectal prolapse, or diabetes mellitus were encountered in a lower incidence (one or two patients).
Table 4

Phenotypes of 7 patients carrying delta F508 mutation

Clinical presentationsNumber of patients
Acute or persistent respiratory symptoms 7
Failure to thrive, malnutrition 7
Abnormal stools 6
Meconium ileus, intestinal obstruction 4
Edema and hypoproteinemia 2
Liver, gallbladder problems 2
Rectal prolapse 1
Diabetes mellitus 1
Phenotypes of 7 patients carrying delta F508 mutation

Discussion

Few molecular studies are performed in Iranian CF patients[7-9]. As Mazandaran CF patients were underrepresented (2 out of 69 patients)[9] or not included in those studies, and regarding the high genetic heterogeneity observed among different provinces of Iran in other disease causing genes[17-19] and also considerable heterogeneity in the nature of CFTR mutations observed among Iranian cystic fibrosis patients[7-9], the molecular characterization of CF in Mazandaran province seems a necessity. Using Reverse Dot Blot method, 5 common CFTR mutations were analyzed in this study in 30 CF patients (13 males and 17 females) aged 6 weeks to 11 years, originating from Mazandaran province and presenting acute or persistent respiratory symptoms and failure to thrive. This method is a simple, rapid and reliable method which allows simultaneous detection of up to 20 different mutations in a single hybridization assay[13]. Delta F508 mutation was present in 13 (21.6%) alleles tested by RDB assay. Six patients were homozygous and one was compound heterozygote for this mutation. The other four mutations tested: N1303K, G542X, R347H and W1282X, were not found in these patients. These mutations were previously reported in most parts of the world[21, 22] including neighboring countries[23-28] and also other provinces of Iran[7-9]. Only one disease-causing mutation was identified in this study. Although the frequency of the ΔF508 among Mazandarani patients was lower (21.6%) than its frequency in European countries, it was still the most frequent mutation among those reported to date in Iran. Previous studies representing overall Iranian CF patients reported a frequency of 16-17.8% for this mutation. This difference could be due to the small number of Mazandarani patients in this study and suggests heterogeneity of Iranian provinces regarding CF mutations. Moreover, its frequency is comparable with those reported in several countries in west Asia, north Africa and Indian subcontinent (Algeria 16.7%, Tunisia 18%, Turkey 24-27%, Saudi Arabia 13%, Pakistan 17%, India 19-27%[6, 20, 21, 24, 26–30]. Previous studies showed that the mutation spectrum in Iran had a significant overlap with that observed in Turkey and was less similar to its spectrum observed in Europe. Specifically, the four most common Turkish mutations were found in Iran, including ΔF508, c.1677delTA, p.G542X, and c.2183AA>G. The "Mediterranean mutation", p.G542X, is reported to be of Phoenician origin[7–9, 29, 31]. Table 5 shows the comparison of the frequency of all five mutations considered in this study in Iran and some neighboring countries.
Table 5

Comparison of the frequency of common CFTR mutations ΔF508, N1303K, G542X, R347H, W1282X in Europe and North Africa with Iran and some neighboring countries

Region or CountryMutation TypeReference
ΔF508W1282XN1303KG542XR347H
Europe and N Africa 66.811.62.60.8-3.66
Turkey 24.5-27ND2.9-3.72.6-4.93-3.66, 23, 25
Saudi Arabia 13ND2NDND27, 28
India 19-27NDNDNDND24, 26
Iran 16-17.80-44.3-5.51.6-3.61.6-3.67, 8, 9
Mazandaran 21.60000Present study

ND: Not detected

Comparison of the frequency of common CFTR mutations ΔF508, N1303K, G542X, R347H, W1282X in Europe and North Africa with Iran and some neighboring countries ND: Not detected Regarding the sample size in this study, underestimation of the other four mutations analyzed may be possible due to their low frequency. All patients presented acute or persistent respiratory symptoms and more than 80% had failure to thrive, malnutrition and abnormal stools. Only 23.3% of patients (7 cases) had meconium ileus and intestinal obstruction among which 4 had homozygote ΔF508 genotype. The high prevalence of meconium ileus among ΔF508 patients was also reported in other studies[32-33]. Liver disorders which are present in 2-3% of children and 5% of adults occur in 25% of CF patients[34]. In this study 4 children presented liver disorders (13.3%) among which 2 had ΔF508 homozygote genotype. Frequency of carriers of a disease-causing CFTR mutation in Iranians (1:40)[8] is very similar to that in European populations (1:25). Consequently, it is believed that the incidence of cystic fibrosis is also similarly high, and that the low incidence commonly believed to be associated cystic fibrosis is also similarly high, and that the low incidence commonly believed to be associated with this non-European population is likely to be due to under-diagnosis. Moreover, intermediate sweat chloride levels may exist in some CF patients[35], leading to misdiagnosis of these patients if the selection criteria is based on sweat chloride positive test as is the case in this study. Furthermore, the frequency of CF may be higher in some isolated populations due to consanguinity, as has been previously reported in an isolated population[36]. The same assessment has been proposed for populations of Turkey and Saudi Arabia[27-29]. Therefore, in addition to Europe and the United States, CF is likely to be prevalent in many other countries as well, although the mutation spectrums may be different. Thus ascertainment of CFTR mutation carrier frequencies and CF incidence among Iranians seems to be a necessity.

Conclusion

Our mutation detection efficiency was rather low (21.6%). However, we cannot assure how much clinical misdiagnosis contributed to this. ΔF508 was the only mutation detected and showed a frequency comparable to that reported in overall Iranian population and neighboring countries. Identification of the remaining mutations and their frequency requires to design appropriate tests to improve the clinical diagnosis and establishing CF prevention programs by carrier screening and prenatal diagnosis.
  35 in total

1.  Geographic distribution of cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator gene mutations in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  H Banjar
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.628

2.  Highest heterogeneity for cystic fibrosis: 36 mutations account for 75% of all CF chromosomes in Turkish patients.

Authors:  Mehmet Okyay Kilinç; Vasiliki Ninidu Ninis; Elif Dağli; Mübeccel Demirkol; Ferda Ozkinay; Zeliha Arikan; Ozgür Coğulu; Gülden Hüner; Fazilet Karakoç; Aslihan Tolun
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2002-12-01

3.  A haplotype framework for cystic fibrosis mutations in Iran.

Authors:  Elahe Elahi; Ahmad Khodadad; Ilya Kupershmidt; Fereshteh Ghasemi; Babak Alinasab; Ramin Naghizadeh; Robert G Eason; Mahshid Amini; Mehran Esmaili; Mohammad R Esmaeili Dooki; Mohammad H Sanati; Ronald W Davis; Mostafa Ronaghi; Yvonne R Thorstenson
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Best practice guidelines for molecular genetic diagnosis of cystic fibrosis and CFTR-related disorders--updated European recommendations.

Authors:  Els Dequeker; Manfred Stuhrmann; Michael A Morris; Teresa Casals; Carlo Castellani; Mireille Claustres; Harry Cuppens; Marie des Georges; Claude Ferec; Milan Macek; Pier-Franco Pignatti; Hans Scheffer; Marianne Schwartz; Michal Witt; Martin Schwarz; Emmanuelle Girodon
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Liver manifestations of cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Deniz Akata; Okan Akhan
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  G542X as a probable Phoenician cystic fibrosis mutation.

Authors:  F Loirat; S Hazout; G Lucotte
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 0.553

7.  Screening of mutations in the CFTR gene in 1195 couples entering assisted reproduction technique programs.

Authors:  Liborio Stuppia; Ivana Antonucci; Francesco Binni; Alessandra Brandi; Nicoletta Grifone; Alessia Colosimo; Mariella De Santo; Valentina Gatta; Gianfranco Gelli; Valentina Guida; Silvia Majore; Giuseppe Calabrese; Chiara Palka; Anna Ravani; Rosanna Rinaldi; Gian Mario Tiboni; Enzo Ballone; Anna Venturoli; Alessandra Ferlini; Isabella Torrente; Paola Grammatico; Elisa Calzolari; Bruno Dallapiccola
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Clinical and molecular characterization of S1118F-CFTR.

Authors:  Himabindu Penmatsa; Carla A Frederick; Sunitha Nekkalapu; Veronica G Conoley; Weiqiang Zhang; Chunying Li; John Kappes; Dennis C Stokes; Anjaparavanda P Naren
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2009-10

9.  Screening of CFTR mutations in an isolated population: identification of carriers and patients.

Authors:  O Chiba-Falek; M Nissim-Rafinia; Z Argaman; A Genem; I Moran; E Kerem; B Kerem
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Survey of CF mutations in the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  Klaus Huber; Borka Mirkovic; Rhea Nersesian; Angela Myers; Randall Saiki; Kurt Bauer
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-11-19
View more
  5 in total

1.  Higher sweat chloride levels in patients with asthma: a case-control study.

Authors:  Shally Awasthi; Pratibha Dixit; Nutan Maurya
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Association of TNF-α Gene Variants With Clinical Manifestation of Cystic Fibrosis Patients of Iranian Azeri Turkish Ethnicity.

Authors:  Aziz Khorrami; Mortaza Bonyadi; Mandana Rafeey; Omid Omrani
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 0.364

3.  Evaluating sequence data quality from the Swift Accel-Amplicon CFTR Panel.

Authors:  Marco L Leung; Deborah J Watson; Courtney N Vaccaro; Fernanda Mafra; Adam Wenocur; Tiancheng Wang; Hakon Hakonarson; Avni Santani
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 6.444

4.  Analysis of CFTR Gene Mutations in Children with Cystic Fibrosis, First Report from North-East of Iran.

Authors:  Atieh Mehdizadeh Hakkak; Mohammad Keramatipour; Saeid Talebi; Azam Brook; Jalil Tavakol Afshari; Amin Raazi; Hamid Reza Kianifar
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.699

5.  Analysis of c.3499+200TA(7_56) and D7S523 Microsatellites Linked to Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Regulator.

Authors:  Vahid Kholghi Oskooei; Mohammad Reza Esmaeili Dooki; Haleh Akhavan-Niaki
Journal:  Int J Mol Cell Med       Date:  2012
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.