Literature DB >> 23056763

Pneumothorax after mechanical ventilation in newborns.

Abdolreza Malek1, Nargess Afzali, Mojtaba Meshkat, Nadieh Hosseini Yazdi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Air leak syndromes including pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum and pulmonary interstitial emphysema are frequent in neonatal period. Mechanical ventilation with positive pressure is one of the most common causes of these syndromes. The aim of this study was to evaluate predisposing factors and incidence of pneumothorax in newborns under mechanical ventilation.
METHODS: This descriptive cross sectional study was performed in 400 newborns under mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit of a teaching hospital in Iran from April 2004 to December 2008. Predisposing factors leading to ventilation and incidence of air leak syndromes were studied. Sex, gestational age, birth weight, type of delivery, history of surfactant replacement therapy, ventilator settings and mortality rate were recorded. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software. Univariate analysis and regression analysis were considered.
FINDINGS: Among 400 patients under mechanical ventilation, 102 neonates developed pneumothorax (26%). Fifty six (54.9%) of them were boys and 46 (45.1%) girls. 54.9% of newborns with pneumothorax were preterm and 45.1% term. Birth weight less than 2500g was recorded in 59.8%. Fifty two percent of these neonates were born by cesarean section vs. 32% of newborns without pneumothorax. The most common type (62.7%) of ventilation leading to pneumothorax was Inspiratory Positive Pressure Ventilation (IPPV). Surfactant replacement therapy was recorded in 32.4% of cases with pneumothorax compared to 60.4% of neonates under ventilation without pneumothorax, which was significantly different (P= 0.017).
CONCLUSION: In newborns surfactant replacement therapy can reduce the risk of pneumothorax caused by mechanical ventilation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IPPV; Newborns; Pneumothorax; Pulmonary Surfactant; Ventilation, Machanical

Year:  2011        PMID: 23056763      PMCID: PMC3446120     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Pediatr        ISSN: 2008-2142            Impact factor:   0.364


Introduction

Pneumothorax is more frequent in the neonatal period than at any other time in life[1]. Symptomatic pneumothorax occurs in 0.08% of all live births[1] and in 5% to 7% of infants with birth weight of less than 1500 gr[2, 3]. The risk for pneumothorax is higher in infants with respiratory distress syndrome, meconium aspiration syndrome, and pulmonary hypoplasia and in infants who need resuscitation at birth. Continuous positive airway pressure and positive pressure ventilation further increase the incidence of pneumothorax[2, 3]. Surfactant, use of synchronized or volume ventilation, and high-rate, low-tidal-volume ventilation decrease the incidence of pneumothorax[4-7]. Pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum should be suspected in any newborn infant who shows signs of respiratory distress, displays restlessness, irritability, or has a sudden change in condition. The objective of this study was to assess air leak syndromes in neonates under mechanical ventilation.

Subjects and Methods

This cross sectional descriptive study was performed in neonates under mechanical ventilation in NICU of 22nd Bahman Teaching Hospital of Mashhad, Iran affiliated to Azad University from 2004 until 2008. Immediately after ventilation a portable chest x-ray was performed and interpreted by a radiologist. Treatment decisions and ventilation settings were made by the clinical team under the direction of an attending neonatologist. The study was approved by the Institution Review Board. All of the newborns were under the same ventilator (Baby log 8000-Drager). The patients were monitored with continuous pulse oxymetry and any change in O2 saturation was recorded. All nurses were trained and licensed especially to work in NICU. All these newborns were examined for the predisposing factors leading to ventilation such as respiratory distress syndrome, meconium aspiration syndrome, pneumonia and birth asphyxia. Other variables like sex, term vs. preterm delivery, unilateral vs. bilateral pneumothorax, birth weight, respiratory management including ventilator settings and mortality rate after pneumothorax were recorded by a general practitioner. The neonates having pneumothorax before ventilation or with malposition of tracheal tube were excluded from the study. All analyses were performed with SPSS 15. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Univariate analysis and regression analysis were considered.

Findings

A total of 400 newborns under mechanical ventilation in the NICU were the subjects of this study. The most common underlying cause of ventilation was lung disorders especially respiratory distress syndrome. It was detected in 241 of 400 (60.25%) neonates in our study; a second cause of ventilation was asphyxia in 10.7%. One hundred and two (26%) cases developed pneumothorax. Fifty six (54.9%) of these were boys and 46 (45.1%) girls. Pneumothorax was present 66.6% in the right side (Fig. 1), 12.8% in the left side and 0.6% bilateral. In 102 neonates with pneumothorax 51 (54.3%) had respiratory distress syndrome. Therefore, RDS seems to be the most frequent underlying lung disorder, although not the cause of pneumothorax. Frequency of other pulmonary disorders associated with pneumothorax is listed in Table 1.
Fig. 1

Day 3 radiograph shows a right-sided tension pneumothorax in a 1.1-kg infant who was intubated for respiratory distress syndrome

Table 1

Frequency of underlying pulmonary causes in pneumothorax cases

Pulmonary disordersFrequency (%)
Respiratory Distress Syndrome51 (54.3)
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome16 (17)
Transient Tachypnea of Neonate1 (1.1)
Post Surgery of Tracheoesophageal Fistula6 (6.4)
Aspiration Pneumonia9 (9.6)
Diaphragmatic Hernia (Pulmonary Hypoplasia)11 (11.7)
Day 3 radiograph shows a right-sided tension pneumothorax in a 1.1-kg infant who was intubated for respiratory distress syndrome Frequency of underlying pulmonary causes in pneumothorax cases Newborns with pneumothorax (case group) were compared to those without pneumothorax (control group) in many different aspects. Univariate analysis showed significant difference for some factors which are listed in Table 2. Multivariate regression logistic (Backward Stepwise) after 6 steps revealed that surfactant replacement therapy was the only significant factor between case and control groups (P=0.017)(Table 3).
Table 2

Comparison of different factors in case and control groups in univariate analysis

ParameteresControl groupCase groupP-value
Male28.8%54.9%0.01
Mean gestational age (week)3431<0.001
Cesarean section32%52%0.015
Surfactant replacement therapy60.4%32.4%0.001
Mean birth weight (gr)239019000.003
Positive inspiratory pressure17.322.7<0.001
Positive end expiratory pressure3.84.20.002
Table 3

Comparison of different significant factors in case and control groups in multivariate logistic Regression Backward Stepwise (Wald)

Variables in the Equation
BSEWalddfSigExp(B)
Surfactant therapy2.0231.4391.97510.1607.560
Type of delivery0.5071.6880.09010.7641.661
Birth Weight−0.0010.0010.51910.4710.999
PIP−0.0720.0571.59610.2060.930
PEEP−2.5071.3253.58110.0580.082
Sex0.5030.9560.27610.5991.653
Gestational Age0.0500.1710.08510.7711.051
Constant7.1796.6371.17010.2791311.758
Surfactant therapy3.1071.2985.72710.01722.358
PEEP−1.9691.1952.71210.1000.140
Constant3.6903.8740.90710.34140.049

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Surfactant therapy, type of delivery, birth weight, PIP, PEEP, sex, gestational age

PIP: Positive Inspiratory Pressure / PEEP: Positive End Expiratory Pressure

Comparison of different factors in case and control groups in univariate analysis Comparison of different significant factors in case and control groups in multivariate logistic Regression Backward Stepwise (Wald) a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Surfactant therapy, type of delivery, birth weight, PIP, PEEP, sex, gestational age PIP: Positive Inspiratory Pressure / PEEP: Positive End Expiratory Pressure Depression of diaphragm and mediastinal shift suggestive of tension pneumothorax were detected in 35.3% and 43.1% of case group respectively (Fig. 2). Twenty one (20.6%) newborns had bilateral pneumothorax, two of them associated with pneumomediastinum.
Fig. 2

CXR shows opaque lungs with air bronchogram due to respiratory distress syndrome in a 1-day-old infant

CXR shows opaque lungs with air bronchogram due to respiratory distress syndrome in a 1-day-old infant The most common type of ventilation leading to pneumothorax was Inspiratory Positive Pressure Ventilation (IPPV) in 62.7% and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in 10% of cases. Endotrcheal CPAP, Endonasal CPAP and Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (IMV), other modes of ventilation, were used in 5%, 5% and 27.3% of cases respectively. Mortality rate after developing pneumothorax was 40.8%, compared with 32% in the control group which was not significantly different (P=0.4).

Discussion

Pneumothorax is a life-threatening condition with high morbidity and mortality. The value of new ventilatory techniques in reducing air leaks has been debated. Pneumothorax during respiratory distress is associated with an increased risk of intraventricular hemorrhage, chronic lung disease and death[7]. It has been suggested that early recognition and treatment are beneficial to avoid damage as a result of hypoxemia, hypercapnia, and impaired venous return[8]. The incidence of developing pneumothorax after mechanical ventilation was 26% which is partially similar to some other studies. The incidence of pneumothorax varies among medical centers with similar populations of infants[7]. Baumer in a randomized controlled trial study reported a series of 924 ventilated newborns, 23.7% of whom developed pneumothorax[9]. Bosche et al reported pneumothorax in 19% of 859 extremely premature newborns under mechanical ventilation[10]. Ngerncham et al found the male sex as one of the risk factors of pneumothorax during the first 24h of life[11]. Study of Benterud et al during 2001-2005 revealed that Cesarean section was associated with more frequent need for ventilation, and development of pneumothorax in neonates[12]. In this study the incidence of pneumothorax is higher (66.7%) in right side. This is similar to the study of Ilce et al in 2003 who reported that 53% of pneumothoraces were in the right hemithorax[13]. Regarding type of ventilation, Buckmaster et al revealed no significant difference in mortality rate between different types of ventilation[14]. Morley et al reported the incidence of pneumothorax after CPAP was 9%, which was fairly similar to present study[15]. One of the factors in development of pneumothorax is the artificial ventilation setting. An increased risk of pneumothorax was associated with maximal PIP. Klinger et al reported that decreasing the risk of pneumothorax requires intensive control of ventilation, including optimizing positive end-expiratory pressure and minimizing peak inspiratory pressure[16]. The most common predisposing factors which led to mechanical ventilation were pulmonary disorders and birth asphyxia. Among lung disorders, respiratory distress syndrome was the most common cause of mechanical ventilation (Fig. 3). It was seen in 60.25% of mechanically ventilated neonates in the present study. In 102 neonates with pneumothorax, 51 (54.3%) cases had respiratory distress syndrome. Meconium aspiration syndrome and diaphragmatic hernia are the other most common pulmonary causes for mechanical ventilation.
Fig. 3

CXR reveals collapse of the right lung, mediastinal shift and depression of right diaphragm due to right-sided tension pneumothorax

CXR reveals collapse of the right lung, mediastinal shift and depression of right diaphragm due to right-sided tension pneumothorax Singh et al in 90 newborns in NICU from 1989 until 1991 found that hyaline membrane disease was the most common cause of artificial ventilation in newborns[17]. There is some controversy about complications of surfactant replacement therapy in different studies. Meberg et al reported that in infants who had received surfactant for RDS the incidence of air leak syndromes during mechanical ventilation was low[18]. Study of Geary et al in 2008 revealed that successful early management of extremely preterm infants with surfactant treatment followed by CPAP is associated with reduction in the incidence and severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia[19]. In our study, univariate analysis revealed significant difference of sex, mean gestational age, cesarean section, mean birth weight, surfactant replacement therapy and mean PIP and PEEP between case and control groups. In regression analysis only surfactant replacement therapy significantly reduced the risk of pneumothorax in ventilated newborns. Only 32.4% of newborns with pnemothorax received surfactant compared to 60.4% of neonates under ventilation without pneumothorax. This difference between the two types of analysis may be due to internal relationship of other variables with each other or because of low sample volume. More studies is suggested with matching of variables in a larger sample volume.

Conclusion

Surfactant replacement therapy can reduce the risk of pneumothorax in newborns during mechanical ventilation.
  19 in total

1.  Events before the diagnosis of a pneumothorax in ventilated neonates.

Authors:  M Watkinson; I Tiron
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  International randomised controlled trial of patient triggered ventilation in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  J H Baumer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Decreased incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia after early management changes, including surfactant and nasal continuous positive airway pressure treatment at delivery, lowered oxygen saturation goals, and early amino acid administration: a historical cohort study.

Authors:  Cara Geary; Melinda Caskey; Rafael Fonseca; Michael Malloy
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Cesarean section is associated with more frequent pneumothorax and respiratory problems in the neonate.

Authors:  Torkil Benterud; Leiv Sandvik; Rolf Lindemann
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Assisted ventilation for hyaline membrane disease.

Authors:  M Singh; A K Deorari; R Aggarwal; V K Paul
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.411

Review 6.  Natural surfactant extract versus synthetic surfactant for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  R F Soll; F Blanco
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

Review 7.  Prophylactic versus selective use of surfactant in preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.

Authors:  R F Soll; C J Morley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

8.  [Mortality, mode of delivery, pneumothorax and intracranial hemorrhage in 859 extremely premature newborn infants between 1984-1992].

Authors:  C Bösche; O Genzel-Boroviczény; H Hepp; R Knitza; H Versmold; R Roos
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 9.  Synchronized mechanical ventilation for respiratory support in newborn infants.

Authors:  A Greenough; A D Milner; G Dimitriou
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

10.  Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants.

Authors:  Colin J Morley; Peter G Davis; Lex W Doyle; Luc P Brion; Jean-Michel Hascoet; John B Carlin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

1.  Pneumothorax in a Preterm Neonate: A Case Report.

Authors:  Rajan Phuyal; Ritika Basnet; Abhin Sapkota; Uttara Gautam; Vijay Kumar Chikanbanjar
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 0.406

2.  Pigtail catheters versus traditional chest drains for pneumothorax treatment in two NICUs.

Authors:  Raffaella Panza; Giorgia Prontera; Kevin Nicholas Ives; Sanja Zivanovic; Charles C Roehr; Michele Quercia; Federico Schettini; Francesco Paolo Bianchi; Silvio Tafuri; Antonio Di Mauro; Nicola Laforgia
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Risk Factors and Outcome of Neonatal Pneumothorax in Tuzla Canton.

Authors:  Devleta Hadzic; Fahrija Skokic; Edin Husaric; Hajriz Alihodzic; Dzenana Softic; Dzenita Kovacevic
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2019-03

4.  Neonatal Pneumothorax Outcome in Preterm and Term Newborns.

Authors:  Miljana Z Jovandaric; Svetlana J Milenkovic; Jelena Dotlic; Ivana R Babovic; Zorica Jestrovic; Branislav Milosevic; Miljan Culjic; Sandra Babic
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 2.948

5.  Frequency and intensive care related risk factors of pneumothorax in ventilated neonates.

Authors:  Ramesh Bhat Yellanthoor; Vidya Ramdas
Journal:  Pulm Med       Date:  2014-04-28

6.  Is pneumothorax size on chest x-ray a predictor of neonatal mortality?

Authors:  Esra Arun Ozer; Ali Yuksel Ergin; Sumer Sutcuoglu; Can Ozturk; Ali Yurtseven
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.364

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.