| Literature DB >> 23056680 |
Hassan Boskabadi1, Gholamali Maamouri, Jalil Tavakol Afshari, Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan, Mohammad-Taghy Shakeri.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Late-onset sepsis is responsible for high morbidity and mortality in newborn infants in the world and in particular in developing countries. In this study, we evaluated whether clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters and measurements of serum interleukin-8 (IL-8) are able to discriminate between late neonatal sepsis and normal baby.Entities:
Keywords: C-Reactive Protein; Interleukin-8; Laboratory Marker; Newborn; Sepsis
Year: 2010 PMID: 23056680 PMCID: PMC3446011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pediatr ISSN: 2008-2142 Impact factor: 0.364
Clinical characteristics of participant groups
| Definitive infection | Clinical sepsis | Healthy neonates |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 18 | 20 | 42 | 0.7 |
|
| 34.5 (3.6) | 36 (3.3) | 36 (3) | 0.5 |
|
| 2140(630) | 2320(740) | 2210(690) | 0.7 |
SD: Standard Deviation
Comparison of biochemical markers between groups
| Marker (Unite) | Groups |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Between groups | Infection and healthy infants | Sepsis and healthy infants | Sepsis and infection | |||
|
| Definitive infection | 510.86 (10.7-822) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.05 |
| Clinical sepsis | 236.76 (11.2-728) | |||||
| Healthy neonates | 15.07 (0.4-50) | |||||
|
| Definitive infection | 22 (1-30) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.01 |
| Clinical sepsis | 16.5 (2-28) | |||||
| Healthy neonates | 1 (0-13) | |||||
|
| Definitive infection | 196 (15-670) | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| Clinical sepsis | 95 (12-370) | |||||
| Healthy neonates | 234 (28-648) | |||||
|
| Definitive infection | 16300 (4100-29000) | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | >0.05 |
| Clinical sepsis | 15800 (5000-35000) | |||||
| Healthy neonates | 9200 (4200-16000) | |||||
Definitive infection compared with healthy infants
Clinical sepsis compared with healthy infants
Clinical sepsis compared with definitive infection
White Blood Cells
Fig. 1Sensitivity and specifity of laboratory tests
Fig. 2Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of laboratory tests