| Literature DB >> 23056377 |
Inês Correia Rosa1, Joana Luísa Pereira, Raquel Costa, Fernando Gonçalves, Robert Prezant.
Abstract
Temperature is a determinant environmental variable in metabolic rates of organisms ultimately influencing important physiological and behavioural features. Stressful conditions such as increasing temperature, particularly within high ranges occurring in the summer, have been suggested to induce flotation behaviour in Corbicula fluminea which may be important in dispersal of this invasive species. However, there has been no experimental evidence supporting this hypothesis. It was already proven that C. fluminea drift is supported by a mucilaginous drogue line produced by mucocytes present in the ctenidia. Detailed microscopic examination of changes in these cells and quantification of clam flotation following one, two and three weeks of exposure to 22, 25 and 30°C was carried out so that the effects of increasing water temperatures in dispersal patterns could be discussed. Results show that changes in temperature triggered an acceleration of the mucocytes production and stimulated flotation behaviour, especially following one week of exposure. Dilution of these effects occurred following longer exposure periods. It is possible that these bivalves perceive changing temperature as a stress and respond accordingly in the short-term, and then acclimate to the new environmental conditions. The response patterns suggest that increasing water temperatures could stimulate C. fluminea population expansion.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23056377 PMCID: PMC3462768 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046635
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Variation of ctenidial mucocytes in clams exposed for one, two, and three weeks to different temperatures.
(A) Mean mucocyte size; (B) Mean mucocyte number; (C) Product between corresponding mucocyte size and number. Field reference corresponds to untreated clams and is represented by the square grey mark and dashed line. Letters placed next to points denote differences between groups of exposure period at each exposure temperature following the post-hoc Tukey test. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Summary of repeated measures ANOVA applied to address the effect of time and temperature in mean ctenidial mucocytes size and number, as well as corresponding product (mucocyte size x number). Significant effects (α = 0.05) are marked in bold.
| Cell size | Cell number | Product (number*size) | ||||||||||
| df | MS | F | p | df | MS | F | p | df | MS | F | p | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Week | 2 | 25.786 | 29.30 |
| 2 | 0.003 | 5.30 |
| 2 | 0.172 | 0.177 | 0.212 |
| Week*Temperature | 4 | 0.904 | 1.027 | 0.432 | 4 | 0.002 | 4.49 |
| 4 | 0.602 | 6.204 |
|
| Residual | 12 | 0.880 | 12 | 0.001 | 12 | 0.097 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Temperature | 2 | 7.564 | 7.64 |
| 2 | 0.001 | 2.15 | 0.198 | 2 | 0.105 | 0.958 | 0.435 |
| Residual | 6 | 0.990 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||
Summary of (A) repeated measures ANOVA and (B) one-way ANOVA applied to address the main effects of time or temperature, respectively, in mean ctenidial mucocytes size and number, as well as corresponding product (mucocyte size x number).
| (A) | 22°C | 25°C | 30°C | |||||||||
| df | MS | F | p | df | MS | F | p | df | MS | F | p | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Week | 2 | 13.903 | 17.62 |
| 1.1 | 16.04 | 7.00 | 0.104 | 1 | 9.136 | 8.34 | 0.102 |
| Residual | 4 | 0.789 | 2.3 | 2.29 | 2 | 1.095 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Week | 2 | 0.007 | 7.00 |
| 1.4 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 | 1.2 | 0.001 | 1.00 | 0.337 |
| Residual | 12 | 0.001 | 12 | 0.001 | 12 | 0.001 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Week | 2 | 1.115 | 11.49 |
| 1.9 | 0.036 | 0.37 | 0.554 | 1.3 | 0.348 | 3.59 | 0.083 |
| Residual | 12 | 0.097 | 12 | 0.097 | 12 | 0.097 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Temp | 2 | 6.077 | 3.91 | 0.082 | 2 | 0.709 | 3.30 | 0.108 | 2 | 2.587 | 2.64 | 0.151 |
| Residual | 6 | 1.554 | 6 | 0.215 | 6 | 0.981 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Temp | 2 | 0.004 | 2.05 | 0.210 | 2 | 0.001 | 0.65 | 0.555 | 2 | 0.001 | 0.50 | 0.630 |
| Residual | 6 | 0.002 | 6 | 0.002 | 6 | 0.002 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Temp | 2 | 0.771 | 1.77 | 0.250 | 2 | 0.166 | 0.381 | 0.699 | 2 | 0.372 | 0.853 | 0.472 |
| Residual | 6 | 0.436 | 6 | 0.436 | 6 | 0.436 | ||||||
Significant effects (α = 0.017) are marked in bold.
Repeated-measures ANOVA referring to mean clam flotation following one, two and three weeks of exposure to different temperatures.
| Source of variation | df | MS | F | P |
| Within-subjects | ||||
| Week | 2 | 0.379 | 51.757 |
|
| Week*Temperature | 4 | 0.045 | 6.146 |
|
| Error | 12 | 0.007 | ||
| Between-subjects | ||||
| Temperature | 2 | 0.31 | 2.635 | 0.151 |
| Error | 6 | 0.12 |
Significant effects (α = 0.05) are marked in bold.
Figure 2Mean clam flotation following exposure to different temperatures for one, two and three weeks.
Letters placed next to points denote differences between groups of exposure period at each exposure temperature following the post-hoc Tukey test. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Summary of (A) repeated measures and (B) one-way and ANOVA applied to address the main effects of time and temperature, respectively, in mean clam flotation.
| (A) | 22°C | 25°C | 30°C | |||||||||
| df | MS | F | p | df | MS | F | p | df | MS | F | p | |
| Week | 2 | 0.037 | 5.28 | 0.023 | 1.1 | 0.623 | 89 |
| 1 | 0.173 | 24.71 |
|
| Error | 12 | 0.007 | 12 | 0.007 | 12 | 0.007 | ||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Temperature | 2 | 0.117 | 0.88 | 0.462 | 2 | 0.004 | 0.03 | 0.970 | ||||
| Error | 6 | 0.133 | 6 | 0.133 | ||||||||
Significant effects (α = 0.017) are marked in bold.