| Literature DB >> 23056322 |
Hagai Levine1, Ran D Balicer, Salman Zarka, Tamar Sela, Vladislav Rozhavski, Daniel Cohen, Raid Kayouf, Ruhama Ambar, Nurith Porat, Ron Dagan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Outbreaks and sporadic cases of pneumococcal illness occur among young adults in confined settings. Our aim was to characterize pneumococcal acquisition and carriage among healthy young adults in Israel during military training in confined settings.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23056322 PMCID: PMC3466294 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046491
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Flow chart of 742 participants in pneumococcal carriage study, for acquisition and for carriage prevalence analyses.
Figure 2A. Pneumococcal carriage prevalence by cohort and weeks since start of training. B. Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval for pneumococcal carriage prevalence during training compared to first visit, adjusted for season and frequency of sharing drinking glass.
Figure 3Pneumococcal cumulative acquisition rate per 100 participants by cohort and weeks since start of training.
Timing of acquisition of pneumococci during training in confined setting in Israel, identified by multivariable repeated measures analysisa.
| Unbalanced model | Balanced model (only complete follow-up) | |||
| P value | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | P value | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | |
| Time since start of training | . | |||
| 3 weeks | .53 | 1.0 | .11 | 1.0 |
| 6 weeks | .22 | 0.73 (0.40–1.34) | .11 | 0.57 (0.25–1.32) |
| 12 weeks | .25 | 0.68 (0.30–1.52) | .04 | 0.42 (0.15–1.14) |
| 24 weeks | .50 | 0.80 (0.37–1.73) | .07 | 0.52 (0.22–1.23) |
| 6, 12, 24 weeks combined | .16 | 0.73 (0.47–1.14) | 0.015 | 0.50 (0.28–0.87) |
Controlling for sharing drinking glass frequency, company and three seasons.
1003 observations included n unbalanced model, including contribution until loss to follow-up.
593 observations included in balanced model, i.e. including only those who were sampled in all 5 visits.
Observed and expected cluster units of pneumococcal clones in three cohorts of trainees, Israel, 2007.
| Distribution of clonal groups by number of isolates per group | Presence of cluster units | Number of cluster units in the current study | ||||
| Number of isolates per group | Observed number of groups | Minimal number needed for cluster unit |
| Expected | Observed |
|
| 2 | 14 | 2 | .33 | 4.67 | 8 | .058 |
| 3 | 8 | 2 | .33 | 2.67 | 8 | <.001 |
| 4 | 5 | 3 | .11 | 0.56 | 3 | .012 |
| 5 | 1 | 3 | .09 | 0.09 | 1 | .09 |
| 7 | 3 | 4 | .021 | 0.06 | 3 | <.001 |
| 9 | 1 | 5 | .005 | 0.005 | 1 | .005 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
A cluster unit was defined by the presence of >50% of identified clones in one of the 3 cohorts.
Expected number of cluster units in the current study for each cluster unit size was derived by multiplying the observed number of groups with the same clone and the same size by the P-value for being a true cluster unit.
For clonal group of 5, if minimal number needed for cluster unit is defined as ≥4 (as was the observed cluster unit) then P value is .037.