Literature DB >> 23055542

Clinical review: Ethnic differences in bone mass--clinical implications.

William D Leslie1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Differences in bone mineral density (BMD) as assessed with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry are observed between geographic and ethnic groups, with important implications in clinical practice. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed was employed to identify relevant studies. A review of the literature was conducted, and data were summarized and integrated. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The available data highlight the complex ethnic variations in BMD, which only partially account for observed variations in fracture rates. Factors contributing to ethnic differences include genetics, skeletal size, body size and composition, lifestyle, and social determinants. Despite BMD differences, the gradient of risk for fracture from BMD and other clinical risk factors appears to be similar across ethnic groups. Furthermore, BMD variation is greater within an ethnic population than between ethnic populations. New imaging technologies have identified ethnic differences in bone geometry, volumetric density, microarchitecture, and estimated bone strength that may contribute to a better understanding of ethnic differences in fracture risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with ethnicity affect BMD and fracture risk through direct and indirect mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23055542     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2012-2863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  27 in total

1.  Associations between adverse social position and bone mineral density in women aged 50 years or older: data from the Manitoba Bone Density Program.

Authors:  S L Brennan; W D Leslie; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Use of anthropometry for the prediction of regional body tissue distribution in adults: benefits and limitations in clinical practice.

Authors:  Aldo Scafoglieri; Jan Pieter Clarys; Erik Cattrysse; Ivan Bautmans
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 6.745

3.  Reference values of bone mineral density and prevalence of osteoporosis in Chinese adults.

Authors:  Z-Q Zhang; S C Ho; Z-Q Chen; C-X Zhang; Y-M Chen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  High osteoporosis risk among East Africans linked to lactase persistence genotype.

Authors:  Constance B Hilliard
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-06-29

Review 5.  Bone composition: relationship to bone fragility and antiosteoporotic drug effects.

Authors:  Adele L Boskey
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2013-12-04

6.  A descriptive study on selected growth parameters and growth hormone receptor gene in healthy young adults from the American Midwest.

Authors:  Samantha N Hartin; Waheeda A Hossain; Ann M Manzardo; Shaquanna Brown; Paula J Fite; Marco Bortolato; Merlin G Butler
Journal:  Growth Horm IGF Res       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 2.372

Review 7.  Are we taking full advantage of the growing number of pharmacological treatment options for osteoporosis?

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Stephen H Schlecht; Kenneth M Kozloff
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.547

Review 8.  Osteoporosis in South-East Asian Countries.

Authors:  Subashini C Thambiah; Swan Sim Yeap
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2020-02

Review 9.  Impact of the environment on the skeleton: is it modulated by genetic factors?

Authors:  Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell; David Karasik
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Bone mineral density of proximal femur in adult Chinese females.

Authors:  Fanjie Li; Yibin Du
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.