Literature DB >> 23055159

Pseudo-dyadic "interaction" on Amazon's Mechanical Turk.

Amy Summerville1, Christopher R Chartier.   

Abstract

Psychological researchers have begun to utilize Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) marketplace as a participant pool. Although past work has established that MTurk is well suited to examining individual behavior, pseudo-dyadic interactions, in which participants falsely believe they are interacting with a partner, are a key element of social and cognitive psychology. The ability to conduct such interdependent research on MTurk would increase the utility of this online population for a broad range of psychologists. The present research therefore attempts to qualitatively replicate well-established pseudo-dyadic tasks on MTurk in order to establish the utility of this platform as a tool for researchers. We find that participants do behave as if a partner is real, even when doing so incurs a financial cost, and that they are sensitive to subtle information about the partner in a minimal-groups paradigm, supporting the use of MTurk for pseudo-dyadic research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23055159     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0250-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  8 in total

1.  Testing Theories about Ethnic Markers: Ingroup Accent Facilitates Coordination, Not Cooperation.

Authors:  Niels Holm Jensen; Michael Bang Petersen; Henrik Høgh-Olesen; Michael Ejstrup
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2015-06

2.  Opportunity costs of reward delays and the discounting of hypothetical money and cigarettes.

Authors:  Patrick S Johnson; Evan S Herrmann; Matthew W Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Online crowdsourcing for efficient rating of speech: a validation study.

Authors:  Tara McAllister Byun; Peter F Halpin; Daniel Szeredi
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 2.288

4.  An online daily diary study of alcohol use using Amazon's Mechanical Turk.

Authors:  Marcella H Boynton; Laura Smart Richman
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2014-06-03

Review 5.  Systems Perspective of Amazon Mechanical Turk for Organizational Research: Review and Recommendations.

Authors:  Melissa G Keith; Louis Tay; Peter D Harms
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-08

6.  Cooperation in Groups of Different Sizes: The Effects of Punishment and Reputation-Based Partner Choice.

Authors:  Junhui Wu; Daniel Balliet; Leonard S Peperkoorn; Angelo Romano; Paul A M Van Lange
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-21

7.  Face threat sensitivity in distributive negotiations: Effects on negotiator self-esteem and demands.

Authors:  Ece Tuncel; Dejun Tony Kong; Judi McLean Parks; Gerben A van Kleef
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  2020-09-17

8.  Self-competence increases the willingness to pay for social influence.

Authors:  Uri Hertz; Evangelia Tyropoulou; Cecilie Traberg; Bahador Bahrami
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.