Literature DB >> 23055085

Trial-by-trial updating of an internal reference in discrimination tasks: evidence from effects of stimulus order and trial sequence.

Oliver Dyjas1, Karin M Bausenhart, Rolf Ulrich.   

Abstract

In psychophysics, participants are often asked to discriminate between a constant standard and a variable comparison. Previous studies have shown that discrimination performance is better when the comparison follows, rather than precedes, the standard. Prominent difference models of psychophysics and decision making cannot easily explain this order effect. However, a simple extension of this model class involving dynamical updating of an internal reference accounts for this order effect. In addition, this Internal Reference Model (IRM) predicts sequential response effects. We examined the predictions of IRM in two duration discrimination experiments. The obtained results are in agreement with the predictions of IRM, suggesting that participants update their internal reference on every trial. Additional simulations show that IRM also accounts for the negative sequential effects observed in single-stimulus paradigms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23055085     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0362-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  21 in total

1.  The expected oddball: effects of implicit and explicit positional expectation on duration perception.

Authors:  Jordan J Wehrman; John Wearden; Paul Sowman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-09-12

2.  Sleep-dependent consolidation benefits fast transfer of time interval training.

Authors:  Lihan Chen; Lu Guo; Ming Bao
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Individual beliefs about temporal continuity explain variation of perceptual biases.

Authors:  Stefan Glasauer; Zhuanghua Shi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Time changes: Timing contexts support event segmentation in associative memory.

Authors:  Vincent van de Ven; Moritz Jäckels; Peter De Weerd
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-10-13

5.  Does time ever fly or slow down? The difficult interpretation of psychophysical data on time perception.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Contradictory behavioral biases result from the influence of past stimuli on perception.

Authors:  Ofri Raviv; Itay Lieder; Yonatan Loewenstein; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Duration Comparisons for Vision and Touch Are Dependent on Presentation Order and Temporal Context.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Kamilla N Miller; Michael E Rudd; Michael A Webster; Fang Jiang
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-23

8.  A common dynamic prior for time in duration discrimination.

Authors:  Joost de Jong; Elkan G Akyürek; Hedderik van Rijn
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-04

9.  Continuous carryover of temporal context dissociates response bias from perceptual influence for duration.

Authors:  Martin Wiener; James C Thompson; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Time perception: the bad news and the good.

Authors:  William J Matthews; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.