Literature DB >> 23054897

Comparison of perioperative outcomes between peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy.

Eric S Hungness1, Ezra N Teitelbaum, Byron F Santos, Fahd O Arafat, John E Pandolfino, Peter J Kahrilas, Nathaniel J Soper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) is a novel endoscopic operation for the treatment of achalasia. Few POEM outcome data exist, and no study has compared POEM with the surgical standard, laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM).
METHODS: Perioperative outcomes were compared between POEM and LHM performed in a nonrandomized fashion. Patients in both groups met the following eligibility criteria: diagnosis of achalasia, age 18-85, and absence of prior achalasia treatment.
RESULTS: Eighteen patients underwent POEM, and 55 patients underwent LHM. Operative times were shorter for POEM (113 vs. 125 min, p < .05), and estimated blood loss was less (≤10 ml in all cases vs. 50 ml, p < .001). Myotomy lengths, complication rates, and length of stay were similar. Pain scores were similar upon post-anesthesia care unit arrival and on postoperative day 1 but were higher at 2 h for POEM patients (3.5 vs. 2, p = .03). Narcotic requirements were similar, although fewer POEM patients received ketorolac. POEM patients' Eckardt scores decreased (median 1 postop vs. 7 preop, p < .001), and 16 (89 %) patients had a treatment success (score ≤3) at median 6-month follow-up. Six weeks after POEM, routine follow-up manometry and esophagram showed normalization of esophagogastric junction pressures and contrast column heights.
CONCLUSIONS: POEM and LHM appear to have similar perioperative outcomes. Further investigation is needed regarding long-term results after POEM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23054897     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-2030-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  22 in total

1.  ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. October 2005.

Authors:  D Rattner; A Kalloo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic Heller myotomy: technical aspects and operative pitfalls.

Authors:  Khashayar Vaziri; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  H Inoue; H Minami; Y Kobayashi; Y Sato; M Kaga; M Suzuki; H Satodate; N Odaka; H Itoh; S Kudo
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 4.  Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; M Fox; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino; W Schwizer; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Pneumatic dilatation or laparoscopic cardiomyotomy in the management of newly diagnosed idiopathic achalasia. Results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Kostic; A Kjellin; M Ruth; H Lönroth; E Johnsson; M Andersson; L Lundell
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  A stepwise approach and early clinical experience in peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia and esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  Lee L Swanström; Erwin Rieder; Christy M Dunst
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic Heller myotomy plus Dor fundoplication versus Nissen fundoplication for achalasia: long-term results.

Authors:  Fabrizio Rebecchi; Claudio Giaccone; Eleonora Farinella; Roberto Campaci; Mario Morino
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Endoscopic and surgical treatments for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guilherme M Campos; Eric Vittinghoff; Charlotte Rabl; Mark Takata; Michael Gadenstätter; Feng Lin; Ruxandra Ciovica
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care.

Authors:  R Jones; O Junghard; J Dent; N Vakil; K Halling; B Wernersson; T Lind
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 8.171

10.  Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Monika A Kwiatek; Thomas Nealis; William Bulsiewicz; Jennifer Post; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  79 in total

Review 1.  Data analyses and perspectives on laparoscopic surgery for esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  Kazuto Tsuboi; Nobuo Omura; Fumiaki Yano; Masato Hoshino; Se-Ryung Yamamoto; Shunsuke Akimoto; Takahiro Masuda; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy: An emerging minimally invasive procedure for achalasia.

Authors:  Yalini Vigneswaran; Michael B Ujiki
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-10-10

3.  Laparoscopic limited Heller myotomy without anti-reflux procedure does not induce significant long-term gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  L C Zurita Macías Valadez; R Pescarus; T Hsieh; L Wasserman; I Apriasz; D Hong; S Gmora; M Cadeddu; M Anvari
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis: Efficacy and safety of POEM for achalasia.

Authors:  Lavinia A Barbieri; Cesare Hassan; Riccardo Rosati; Uberto Fumagalli Romario; Loredana Correale; Alessandro Repici
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  An extended proximal esophageal myotomy is necessary to normalize EGJ distensibility during Heller myotomy for achalasia, but not POEM.

Authors:  Ezra N Teitelbaum; Nathaniel J Soper; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas; Lubomyr Boris; Frédéric Nicodème; Zhiyue Lin; Eric S Hungness
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Cost-effectiveness of per oral endoscopic myotomy relative to laparoscopic Heller myotomy for the treatment of achalasia.

Authors:  Erin K Greenleaf; Joshua S Winder; Christopher S Hollenbeak; Randy S Haluck; Abraham Mathew; Eric M Pauli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Treatment implications of high-resolution manometry findings: options for patients with esophageal dysmotility.

Authors:  Ahmed Bolkhir; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03

8.  Comparison of esophagogastric junction distensibility changes during POEM and Heller myotomy using intraoperative FLIP.

Authors:  Ezra N Teitelbaum; Lubomyr Boris; Fahd O Arafat; Frédéric Nicodème; Zhiyue Lin; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino; Nathaniel J Soper; Eric S Hungness
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: An American perspective.

Authors:  David Friedel; Rani Modayil; Shahzad Iqbal; James H Grendell; Stavros N Stavropoulos
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-09-16

10.  Symptomatic and physiologic outcomes one year after peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) for treatment of achalasia.

Authors:  Ezra N Teitelbaum; Nathaniel J Soper; Byron F Santos; Fahd O Arafat; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas; Ikuo Hirano; Eric S Hungness
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.