OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of oil massage on growth in preterm babies less than 1800 g. METHODS: This randomised controlled trial was conducted in Neonatal intensive care unit of a level II hospital. Neonates with birth weight <; 1800 g, gestation < 35 wk and < 48 h of age at enrolment were included in the studies. Eligible neonates were randomized to one of the two groups (a) Oil massage along with standard care of low birth weight (b) Standard care of low birth weight without massage. Weight, length and head circumference was measured in the two groups at 7 d intervals. Serum triglyceride levels were measured at enrolment and at completion of study. Primary outcome variable was weight gain at 28 d after enrolment. RESULTS:A total of forty-eight neonates were randomisd to either oil massage group (n = 25) or standard care of low birth weight without massage group (n = 23). Mean (SD) weight of babies in the two groups was 1466.4 ± 226.8 g in oil massage group and 1416.6 ± 229.9 g in the control group. At 28 d, weight gain in the oil massage group (476.76 ± 47.9 g) was higher compared to the control group (334.96 ± 46.4 g) (p < 0.05). At 7 d, less weight loss (7.80 ± 9.8 g) was observed in babies in oil massage group compared to control group (21.52 ± 19.4 g) (p = 0.003). However, there was no significant difference in serum triglycerides and other anthropometric parameters. CONCLUSIONS:Oil application has a potential to improve weight gain and cause less weight loss in first 7 d in low birth weight neonates.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of oil massage on growth in preterm babies less than 1800 g. METHODS: This randomised controlled trial was conducted in Neonatal intensive care unit of a level II hospital. Neonates with birth weight < 1800 g, gestation < 35 wk and < 48 h of age at enrolment were included in the studies. Eligible neonates were randomized to one of the two groups (a) Oil massage along with standard care of low birth weight (b) Standard care of low birth weight without massage. Weight, length and head circumference was measured in the two groups at 7 d intervals. Serum triglyceride levels were measured at enrolment and at completion of study. Primary outcome variable was weight gain at 28 d after enrolment. RESULTS: A total of forty-eight neonates were randomisd to either oil massage group (n = 25) or standard care of low birth weight without massage group (n = 23). Mean (SD) weight of babies in the two groups was 1466.4 ± 226.8 g in oil massage group and 1416.6 ± 229.9 g in the control group. At 28 d, weight gain in the oil massage group (476.76 ± 47.9 g) was higher compared to the control group (334.96 ± 46.4 g) (p < 0.05). At 7 d, less weight loss (7.80 ± 9.8 g) was observed in babies in oil massage group compared to control group (21.52 ± 19.4 g) (p = 0.003). However, there was no significant difference in serum triglycerides and other anthropometric parameters. CONCLUSIONS:Oil application has a potential to improve weight gain and cause less weight loss in first 7 d in low birth weight neonates.
Authors: Vishwajeet Kumar; Aarti Kumar; Shambhavi Mishra; Peiyi Kan; Sana Ashraf; Shambhavi Singh; Keona J H Blanks; Michael Baiocchi; Mika Limcaoco; Amit K Ghosh; Alok Kumar; Raghav Krishna; David K Stevenson; Lu Tian; Gary L Darmstadt Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Gary L Darmstadt; Naila Z Khan; Summer Rosenstock; Humaira Muslima; Monowara Parveen; Wajeeha Mahmood; A S M Nawshad Uddin Ahmed; M A K Azad Chowdhury; Scott Zeger; Samir K Saha Journal: J Health Popul Nutr Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Melissa M Lai; Giulia D'Acunto; Andrea Guzzetta; Roslyn N Boyd; Stephen E Rose; Jurgen Fripp; Simon Finnigan; Naoni Ngenda; Penny Love; Koa Whittingham; Kerstin Pannek; Robert S Ware; Paul B Colditz Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2016-08-27 Impact factor: 2.125