Literature DB >> 23054771

Applicability of a modified MCE filter method with Button Inhalable Sampler for monitoring personal bioaerosol inhalation exposure.

Zhenqiang Xu1, Hong Xu, Maosheng Yao.   

Abstract

In this study, a "modified" mixed cellulose ester (MCE) filter culturing method (directly placing filter on agar plate for culturing without extraction) was investigated in enumerating airborne culturable bacterial and fungal aerosol concentration and diversity both in different environments. A Button Inhalable Sampler loaded with a MCE filter was operated at a flow rate of 5 L/min to collect indoor and outdoor air samples using different sampling times: 10, 20, and 30 min in three different time periods of the day. As a comparison, a BioStage impactor, regarded as the gold standard, was operated in parallel at a flow rate of 28.3 L/min for all tests. The air samples collected by the Button Inhalable Sampler were directly placed on agar plates for culturing, and those collected by the BioStage impactor were incubated directly at 26 °C. The colony forming units (CFUs) were manually counted and the culturable concentrations were calculated both for bacterial and fungal aerosols. The bacterial CFUs developed were further washed off and subjected to polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) for diversity analysis. For fungal CFUs, microscopy method was applied to studying the culturable fungal diversity obtained using different methods. Experimental results showed that the performance of two investigated methods varied with sampling environments and microbial types (culturable bacterial and fungal aerosols). For bacterial aerosol sampling, both methods were shown to perform equally well, and in contrast the "modified" MCE filter method was demonstrated to enumerate more culturable fungal aerosols than the BioStage impactor. In general, the microbial species richness (number of gel bands) was observed to increase with increasing collection time. For both methods, the DGGE gel patterns were observed to vary with sampling time and environment despite of similar number of gel bands. In addition, an increase in sampling time from 20 to 30 min was found not to substantially alter the species richness. Regardless of the sampling methods, more species richness was observed in the outdoor environment than the indoor environment. This study described a new personal bioaerosol exposure assessment protocol, and it was demonstrated applicable in monitoring the personal bioaerosol exposure in replace of an Andersen-type impactor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23054771     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-1204-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  30 in total

1.  Assessment of bioaerosols in swine barns by filtration and impaction.

Authors:  Bernardo Z Predicala; James E Urban; Ronaldo G Maghirang; Sheryll B Jerez; Robert D Goodband
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Effect of sampling time on the culturability of airborne fungi and bacteria sampled by filtration.

Authors:  Kate T H Durand; Michael L Muilenberg; Harriet A Burge; Noah S Seixas
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2002-01

Review 3.  Bioaerosol health effects and exposure assessment: progress and prospects.

Authors:  J Douwes; P Thorne; N Pearce; D Heederik
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2003-04

4.  Inactivation of viruses in bubbling processes utilized for personal bioaerosol monitoring.

Authors:  I E Agranovski; A S Safatov; A I Borodulin; O V Pyankov; V A Petrishchenko; A N Sergeev; A P Agafonov; G M Ignatiev; A A Sergeev; V Agranovski
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Analysis of portable impactor performance for enumeration of viable bioaerosols.

Authors:  Maosheng Yao; Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Pneumonia and respiratory failure from swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) in Mexico.

Authors:  Rogelio Perez-Padilla; Daniela de la Rosa-Zamboni; Samuel Ponce de Leon; Mauricio Hernandez; Francisco Quiñones-Falconi; Edgar Bautista; Alejandra Ramirez-Venegas; Jorge Rojas-Serrano; Christopher E Ormsby; Ariel Corrales; Anjarath Higuera; Edgar Mondragon; Jose Angel Cordova-Villalobos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification.

Authors:  I G Wilson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Inactivation of microorganisms using electrostatic fields.

Authors:  Maosheng Yao; Gediminas Mainelis; Hey Reoun An
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Bees Scavenge Airborne Bacteria.

Authors: 
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  The effect of filter material on bioaerosol collection of Bacillus subtilis spores used as a Bacillus anthracis simulant.

Authors:  Nancy Clark Burton; Atin Adhikari; Sergey A Grinshpun; Richard Hornung; Tiina Reponen
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2005-04-14
View more
  1 in total

1.  A high-flow portable biological aerosol trap (HighBioTrap) for rapid microbial detection.

Authors:  Haoxuan Chen; Maosheng Yao
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.433

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.